Sol wrote:Calibretto wrote:SoL, if you have the time, please create a top 10 of tournamentplayers as well, its fun.
top 10 of what mate? most kills?
for example and of previous tournamentwinners. Maybe other suggestions?
Sol wrote:Calibretto wrote:SoL, if you have the time, please create a top 10 of tournamentplayers as well, its fun.
top 10 of what mate? most kills?
Cersei Lannister wrote:Seeing how the 'Top Ten' is basically a free-recon-fest, I do not believe there is much to be gained from watching this specific to Arenas.
Of course, I am completely in favour of extremely detailed Arena historical statistics.
Field Marshall wrote:Really?Sol wrote:It's not going to destroy your life
I think this is sig worthy in fact.
Cersei Lannister wrote:Seeing how the 'Top Ten' is basically a free-recon-fest, I do not believe there is much to be gained from watching this specific to Arenas.
Of course, I am completely in favour of extremely detailed Arena historical statistics.
Calibretto wrote:We dont want to make you even more intelligent then you already are
GhostyGoo wrote:Yesno.
the3rdlibra wrote:if it's a silly turnip head competition you want, i'm going to decline as i think i may have met my match in you vegetable brains.
Cersei Lannister wrote:Debasing? I am not the one drawing crazy pictures of force fielded stick figures.
GhostyGoo wrote:Calibretto wrote:We dont want to make you even more intelligent then you already are
HA! Hilarious! *sits back watching Sol's head grow bigger and wonders how he's gonna get through the door*
Calibretto wrote:Cersei Lannister wrote:Seeing how the 'Top Ten' is basically a free-recon-fest, I do not believe there is much to be gained from watching this specific to Arenas.
Of course, I am completely in favour of extremely detailed Arena historical statistics.
Well, I cant explain it in details very well, but I mean indeed statistics where the previous winners are listed; previous top3 or top10. Maybe a little less then extremely detailed, but detailed is ok
Field Marshall wrote:Really?Sol wrote:It's not going to destroy your life
I think this is sig worthy in fact.
Something like Quantum's Legends could work? http://quantumgate.gatewars.com/legends ... ntumVersesSol wrote:I could do that, but not now, no point really, we have only had a handful of tournaments...Calibretto wrote:Well, I cant explain it in details very well, but I mean indeed statistics where the previous winners are listed; previous top3 or top10. Maybe a little less then extremely detailed, but detailed is okCersei Lannister wrote:Seeing how the 'Top Ten' is basically a free-recon-fest, I do not believe there is much to be gained from watching this specific to Arenas.
Of course, I am completely in favour of extremely detailed Arena historical statistics.
Cersei Lannister wrote:Something like Quantum's Legends could work? http://quantumgate.gatewars.com/legends ... ntumVersesSol wrote:I could do that, but not now, no point really, we have only had a handful of tournaments...Calibretto wrote:Well, I cant explain it in details very well, but I mean indeed statistics where the previous winners are listed; previous top3 or top10. Maybe a little less then extremely detailed, but detailed is okCersei Lannister wrote:Seeing how the 'Top Ten' is basically a free-recon-fest, I do not believe there is much to be gained from watching this specific to Arenas.
Of course, I am completely in favour of extremely detailed Arena historical statistics.
No need to reinvent a wheel.
Field Marshall wrote:Really?Sol wrote:It's not going to destroy your life
I think this is sig worthy in fact.
True. But list the 'highest' stats people build instead?Sol wrote:hmm...the problem is we anticipate that people will be demolished, and so there will be always little to no stats on anyone .Cersei Lannister wrote:Something like Quantum's Legends could work? http://quantumgate.gatewars.com/legends ... ntumVersesSol wrote:I could do that, but not now, no point really, we have only had a handful of tournaments...Calibretto wrote:Well, I cant explain it in details very well, but I mean indeed statistics where the previous winners are listed; previous top3 or top10. Maybe a little less then extremely detailed, but detailed is okCersei Lannister wrote:Seeing how the 'Top Ten' is basically a free-recon-fest, I do not believe there is much to be gained from watching this specific to Arenas.
Of course, I am completely in favour of extremely detailed Arena historical statistics.
No need to reinvent a wheel.
My word. That sounds exquisite. I understood exactly 93% of that, and the idea I got out of that, is good.Sol wrote:I just thought of something, like a sort of average tournament rank, pretty much adds your tournament ranks together, divides by how many tournaments you entered and sorts accordingly (including how many you actually entered, so it stops someone from just entering 1 tournament, getting rank 1 and just not entering any others).
So in essence it will display what you roughly get per each tournament, perhaps i could use the trapezoidal approximation instead...
Sol wrote:Cersei Lannister wrote:Something like Quantum's Legends could work? http://quantumgate.gatewars.com/legends ... ntumVersesSol wrote:I could do that, but not now, no point really, we have only had a handful of tournaments...Calibretto wrote:Well, I cant explain it in details very well, but I mean indeed statistics where the previous winners are listed; previous top3 or top10. Maybe a little less then extremely detailed, but detailed is okCersei Lannister wrote:Seeing how the 'Top Ten' is basically a free-recon-fest, I do not believe there is much to be gained from watching this specific to Arenas.
Of course, I am completely in favour of extremely detailed Arena historical statistics.
No need to reinvent a wheel.
hmm...the problem is we anticipate that people will be demolished, and so there will be always little to no stats on anyone .
I just thought of something, like a sort of average tournament rank, pretty much adds your tournament ranks together, divides by how many tournaments you entered and sorts accordingly (including how many you actually entered, so it stops someone from just entering 1 tournament, getting rank 1 and just not entering any others).
So in essence it will display what you roughly get per each tournament, perhaps i could use the trapezoidal approximation instead...
We do already have an overall rank for the past games in kill history.
div-null error risk!Calibretto wrote:...love it...on the other hand...I never was in the other tounamentsSol wrote:Cersei Lannister wrote:Something like Quantum's Legends could work? http://quantumgate.gatewars.com/legends ... ntumVersesSol wrote:I could do that, but not now, no point really, we have only had a handful of tournaments...Calibretto wrote:Well, I cant explain it in details very well, but I mean indeed statistics where the previous winners are listed; previous top3 or top10. Maybe a little less then extremely detailed, but detailed is okCersei Lannister wrote:Seeing how the 'Top Ten' is basically a free-recon-fest, I do not believe there is much to be gained from watching this specific to Arenas.
Of course, I am completely in favour of extremely detailed Arena historical statistics.
No need to reinvent a wheel.
hmm...the problem is we anticipate that people will be demolished, and so there will be always little to no stats on anyone .
I just thought of something, like a sort of average tournament rank, pretty much adds your tournament ranks together, divides by how many tournaments you entered and sorts accordingly (including how many you actually entered, so it stops someone from just entering 1 tournament, getting rank 1 and just not entering any others).
So in essence it will display what you roughly get per each tournament, perhaps i could use the trapezoidal approximation instead...
We do already have an overall rank for the past games in kill history.
Cersei Lannister wrote:True. But list the 'highest' stats people build instead?Sol wrote:hmm...the problem is we anticipate that people will be demolished, and so there will be always little to no stats on anyone .
Cersei Lannister wrote:Sol wrote:I just thought of something, like a sort of average tournament rank, pretty much adds your tournament ranks together, divides by how many tournaments you entered and sorts accordingly (including how many you actually entered, so it stops someone from just entering 1 tournament, getting rank 1 and just not entering any others).
So in essence it will display what you roughly get per each tournament, perhaps i could use the trapezoidal approximation instead...
My word. That sounds exquisite. I understood exactly 93% of that, and the idea I got out of that, is good.
Field Marshall wrote:Really?Sol wrote:It's not going to destroy your life
I think this is sig worthy in fact.
Cersei Lannister wrote:div-null error risk!Calibretto wrote:...love it...on the other hand...I never was in the other tounamentsSol wrote:Cersei Lannister wrote:Something like Quantum's Legends could work? http://quantumgate.gatewars.com/legends ... ntumVersesSol wrote:I could do that, but not now, no point really, we have only had a handful of tournaments...Calibretto wrote:Well, I cant explain it in details very well, but I mean indeed statistics where the previous winners are listed; previous top3 or top10. Maybe a little less then extremely detailed, but detailed is okCersei Lannister wrote:Seeing how the 'Top Ten' is basically a free-recon-fest, I do not believe there is much to be gained from watching this specific to Arenas.
Of course, I am completely in favour of extremely detailed Arena historical statistics.
No need to reinvent a wheel.
hmm...the problem is we anticipate that people will be demolished, and so there will be always little to no stats on anyone .
I just thought of something, like a sort of average tournament rank, pretty much adds your tournament ranks together, divides by how many tournaments you entered and sorts accordingly (including how many you actually entered, so it stops someone from just entering 1 tournament, getting rank 1 and just not entering any others).
So in essence it will display what you roughly get per each tournament, perhaps i could use the trapezoidal approximation instead...
We do already have an overall rank for the past games in kill history.
Field Marshall wrote:Really?Sol wrote:It's not going to destroy your life
I think this is sig worthy in fact.
Boom, snap! I got mathed. You are so evil. Keep it up, it leads to good things.Sol wrote:(Inverse rank 0 ) +1, ultimate div-null turn aroundCersei Lannister wrote:div-null error risk!Calibretto wrote:...love it...on the other hand...I never was in the other tounamentsSol wrote:hmm...the problem is we anticipate that people will be demolished, and so there will be always little to no stats on anyone .Cersei Lannister wrote:Something like Quantum's Legends could work? http://quantumgate.gatewars.com/legends ... ntumVersesSol wrote:I could do that, but not now, no point really, we have only had a handful of tournaments...Calibretto wrote:Well, I cant explain it in details very well, but I mean indeed statistics where the previous winners are listed; previous top3 or top10. Maybe a little less then extremely detailed, but detailed is okCersei Lannister wrote:Seeing how the 'Top Ten' is basically a free-recon-fest, I do not believe there is much to be gained from watching this specific to Arenas.
Of course, I am completely in favour of extremely detailed Arena historical statistics.
No need to reinvent a wheel.
I just thought of something, like a sort of average tournament rank, pretty much adds your tournament ranks together, divides by how many tournaments you entered and sorts accordingly (including how many you actually entered, so it stops someone from just entering 1 tournament, getting rank 1 and just not entering any others).
So in essence it will display what you roughly get per each tournament, perhaps i could use the trapezoidal approximation instead...
We do already have an overall rank for the past games in kill history.