So I thought by having a co you would lose your bonus up but gain extra income?
It appears I have lost both & I don't have any officers either
Co has 7 other officers, but that shouldnt take my income tho should it?
is this supposed to happen?
-
- Forum Grunt
- Posts: 56
- Joined: Sun Jul 19, 2009 5:07 pm
-
- The Ablest Man
- Posts: 1758
- Joined: Thu Jun 18, 2009 1:07 pm
- Alliance: Multiverse
- Race: Clockwork Admin
- ID: 1940718
Re: is this supposed to happen?
Well, you probably had yourself as your commander prio to joining this new guy. So you would have had a small income bonus from yourself.
You have now joined a commander with 7 officers, so however much of your commanders income he has set to give to his officers (10 - 30%) will split equaly between all 7 of you. So it is entirely possible that you will be getting less NAQ per turn now that your his/her officer, than you would have been getting being your own commander.
Just to clarify though, the commander does not get any of your NAQ, he/she only gets a bonus to their UP generation.
You have now joined a commander with 7 officers, so however much of your commanders income he has set to give to his officers (10 - 30%) will split equaly between all 7 of you. So it is entirely possible that you will be getting less NAQ per turn now that your his/her officer, than you would have been getting being your own commander.
Just to clarify though, the commander does not get any of your NAQ, he/she only gets a bonus to their UP generation.
-
- Forum Grunt
- Posts: 56
- Joined: Sun Jul 19, 2009 5:07 pm
Re: is this supposed to happen?
Nah never had myself as my co, had no co until I joined my current one
-
- Semper Ubi Sub Ubi
- Posts: 2607
- Joined: Thu Mar 31, 2005 4:34 am
- ID: 0
-
Honours and Awards
Re: is this supposed to happen?
No commander: +10% income and +10% UP
Yourself as commander: +20% UP
Another commander: minimum wage
Yourself as commander: +20% UP
Another commander: minimum wage
Agapooka wrote:The argument that because a premise cannot be proven false, it must be true, is known as a Negative Proof Fallacy in logic.
Pooka's UU Market Loyalty Card:Mister Sandman wrote:Nothing at all near the negative proof fallacy in logic. If it cannot be proven false, it has to be true.
Rudy Pena: 1 stamp!
A Spider: 1 stamp!
-
- Forum Grunt
- Posts: 56
- Joined: Sun Jul 19, 2009 5:07 pm
Re: is this supposed to happen?
ahh aids