Upon a recent appeal to an Appeal which I have filed, a comment was made by Caprilla in response to the said appeal, excerpt below which has been edited to highlight my points. The full thread here: Subject: Warning Issued on 17th June
Firstly, the accusation that I should have received more warnings than I actually have received. I would really like to know what these are. I genuinely, cannot recall any verbal warnings or PMs which have resulted in anything but full obedience and co-operation from myself.Caprilla wrote:The discussion (detailed in the next paragraph), brought up several other incidents which you could/should have been warned for, but weren't, largely due to you making a fuss. Is it something the forum staff can be proud of? Not particularly, but it does cast a different light on your ' perfect and spotless ' record.
I discussed the situation with relevant section head. I was informed that given your previous behavior/history on the forums, to cease replying to your messages, and wait for you to follow Protocol and speak to the SH themselves.
Secondly, I would like to express my disappointment in the administration and support staff for failing firstly myself and secondly the community. If I have failed the rules in the past, for what reason have I been given slack where others have been branded with the full punishment? Like Caprilla rightly suggests, it is not something that you should be proud of.
Thus I guess my question is, why do you hold a prejudice on those people who are maybe less literate and perhaps less familiar with protocol and policy? Just because I received a high level of education and I am able to speak English as my first language do I receive more leniency than other end users? I hate to user the word so flippantly given my "history" but do you think some mods do actually omit some bias and others lacking the cojones to implement adequate punishments?