StarGateWars Forums

@3 above, that is why they are anonymous, cant kill what you cant see. But if people want to be the biggest and best they at least know what to aim for. Any better reason?

@legendary A: It updates as soon as you click on the button so its live 365/52/7/24/60/60, as for the actual logs removing two week old attacks, yeah that will affect it, but not much, old ones die as the new ones come in all the time.

i like it a lot. Gives people something to aim for

I find the angriest player ranking a bit flawed as its based on the number of out going hostilities rather than damage done or turns used


Meaning I can can beat the rank 5 fold by just hitting an inactive with 1 turn attacks

[BoT] Jason wrote:I find the angriest player ranking a bit flawed as its based on the number of out going hostilities rather than damage done or turns used


Meaning I can can beat the rank 5 fold by just hitting an inactive with 1 turn attacks

shush im in the top 10
don't ruin it for me

[BoT] Jason wrote:I find the angriest player ranking a bit flawed as its based on the number of out going hostilities rather than damage done or turns used


Meaning I can can beat the rank 5 fold by just hitting an inactive with 1 turn attacks

oh I thought it was based on number of war settings you had..

<< currently number 22

10 Prudent AJNA 510


504 attacks total | page 1 of 17
6 files total | page 1 of 1

i'll make a new calculation for the angriest, i just had to think of something.

Sol wrote:i'll make a new calculation for the angriest, i just had to think of something.

Hmmm, how about calculating the people that get attacked the most....

I'm sure they'd most likely be quite angry about it, afterall.

~Solrayne~ wrote:

Sol wrote:i'll make a new calculation for the angriest, i just had to think of something.

Hmmm, how about calculating the people that get attacked the most....

I'm sure they'd most likely be quite angry about it, afterall.

if they were angry then they would retaliate making them attack the most

Sol wrote:if they were angry then they would retaliate making them attack the most

then this cals for a 'most frustrated player' list.

Logged in daily, is attacked the most, lost most more DMU then gained, and does not attack back.

Duck Dodgers wrote:

Sol wrote:if they were angry then they would retaliate making them attack the most

then this cals for a 'most frustrated player' list.

Logged in daily, is attacked the most, lost most more DMU then gained, and does not attack back.

too pointless and hard to make, actually you wouldnt be able to. Dont have enough details to make a query.

Sol wrote:

Duck Dodgers wrote:

Sol wrote:if they were angry then they would retaliate making them attack the most

then this cals for a 'most frustrated player' list.

Logged in daily, is attacked the most, lost most more DMU then gained, and does not attack back.

too pointless and hard to make, actually you wouldnt be able to. Dont have enough details to make a query.

thanks for taking it serious, i realy was not xD

I'm just wondering do you loose points u collect or do they stay there forever (for the most angriest player).. Because I lost 2000 points over night...just wondering why

obluette wrote:I'm just wondering do you loose points u collect or do they stay there forever (for the most angriest player).. Because I lost 2000 points over night...just wondering why

I would say thats because you lost some attack pages ...

I noticed there was a big change up with :The 10 Most Prolific Decenders
Before it took 84 kills to be ranked.....what happened ?

pc wrote:

obluette wrote:I'm just wondering do you loose points u collect or do they stay there forever (for the most angriest player).. Because I lost 2000 points over night...just wondering why

I would say thats because you lost some attack pages ...

I noticed there was a big change up with :The 10 Most Prolific Decenders
Before it took 84 kills to be ranked.....what happened ?

1. Thats pretty much it.

2. prolific descenders only includes active users now (it was using an all time figure including vac'ed accounts etc) seems a bit more fair.