StarGateWars Forums

Julietta Putina wrote:

Duderanch wrote:BAD thing. Can't vote because of my forum skin but cba changing it.

Bad, bad, bad,

And why, pray tell?

It'll be just as skewed as main.

With no trading in ascended people's accounts speak for the selves. I have sold 100Q DMU in the last few days, with people doing that 'farming' records will be way off and with ME ranks inspiring people to take out the big stats my farms will get screwed.

Duderanch wrote:

Julietta Putina wrote:

Duderanch wrote:BAD thing. Can't vote because of my forum skin but cba changing it.

Bad, bad, bad,

And why, pray tell?

It'll be just as skewed as main.

With no trading in ascended people's accounts speak for the selves. I have sold 100Q DMU in the last few days, with people doing that 'farming' records will be way off and with ME ranks inspiring people to take out the big stats my farms will get screwed.

People destroy stats for fun anyway. At the very least, i for one, would love to see how i go with farming with respect to the turns i use. Let alone see how well i do in war. Having ME is a good measuring stick for alliances.

Sol wrote:

Duderanch wrote:

Julietta Putina wrote:

Duderanch wrote:BAD thing. Can't vote because of my forum skin but cba changing it.

Bad, bad, bad,

And why, pray tell?

It'll be just as skewed as main.

With no trading in ascended people's accounts speak for the selves. I have sold 100Q DMU in the last few days, with people doing that 'farming' records will be way off and with ME ranks inspiring people to take out the big stats my farms will get screwed.

People destroy stats for fun anyway. At the very least, i for one, would love to see how i go with farming with respect to the turns i use. Let alone see how well i do in war. Having ME is a good measuring stick for alliances.

Its good for alliances...in main. Ascended doesnt have alliances.

Rudy Pena wrote:

Sol wrote:

Duderanch wrote:

Julietta Putina wrote:

Duderanch wrote:BAD thing. Can't vote because of my forum skin but cba changing it.

Bad, bad, bad,

And why, pray tell?

It'll be just as skewed as main.

With no trading in ascended people's accounts speak for the selves. I have sold 100Q DMU in the last few days, with people doing that 'farming' records will be way off and with ME ranks inspiring people to take out the big stats my farms will get screwed.

People destroy stats for fun anyway. At the very least, i for one, would love to see how i go with farming with respect to the turns i use. Let alone see how well i do in war. Having ME is a good measuring stick for alliances.

Its good for alliances...in main. Ascended doesnt have alliances.

So every player that has ascended account isnt apart of an alliance?

Sol wrote:

Rudy Pena wrote:

Sol wrote:

Duderanch wrote:

Julietta Putina wrote:

Duderanch wrote:BAD thing. Can't vote because of my forum skin but cba changing it.

Bad, bad, bad,

And why, pray tell?

It'll be just as skewed as main.

With no trading in ascended people's accounts speak for the selves. I have sold 100Q DMU in the last few days, with people doing that 'farming' records will be way off and with ME ranks inspiring people to take out the big stats my farms will get screwed.

People destroy stats for fun anyway. At the very least, i for one, would love to see how i go with farming with respect to the turns i use. Let alone see how well i do in war. Having ME is a good measuring stick for alliances.

Its good for alliances...in main. Ascended doesnt have alliances.

So every player that has ascended account isnt apart of an alliance?

Not in the ascended server no, but in main yes.

Rudy Pena wrote:

Sol wrote:

Rudy Pena wrote:

Sol wrote:

Duderanch wrote:

Julietta Putina wrote:

Duderanch wrote:BAD thing. Can't vote because of my forum skin but cba changing it.

Bad, bad, bad,

And why, pray tell?

It'll be just as skewed as main.

With no trading in ascended people's accounts speak for the selves. I have sold 100Q DMU in the last few days, with people doing that 'farming' records will be way off and with ME ranks inspiring people to take out the big stats my farms will get screwed.

People destroy stats for fun anyway. At the very least, i for one, would love to see how i go with farming with respect to the turns i use. Let alone see how well i do in war. Having ME is a good measuring stick for alliances.

Its good for alliances...in main. Ascended doesnt have alliances.

So every player that has ascended account isnt apart of an alliance?

Not in the ascended server no, but in main yes.

Exactly, so even the ascended accounts are still apart of an alliance, it's a whole package really. Nonetheless alliances can utilize the ME as a measuring stick for their members ascended accounts.

To issues about people buying DMU via market. People buy UU from others, then raid it off other people when they're over the raid limit. Happens in main all the time, I'm sure we can get past it in Asc ^.^

Hope wrote:To issues about people buying DMU via market. People buy UU from others, then raid it off other people when they're over the raid limit. Happens in main all the time, I'm sure we can get past it in Asc ^.^

Another reason why ME should be removed from main IMO.

Hope wrote:To issues about people buying DMU via market. People buy UU from others, then raid it off other people when they're over the raid limit. Happens in main all the time, I'm sure we can get past it in Asc ^.^

That hardly matters if you want to gauge your own efforts, it doesn't have to be ranked.

Agreed that it shouldn't be ranked. Leave it anonymous, that's fine. I only want it personally for 2 reasons. 1)To see how much DMU i get. 2)To see my efforts during war. Which it'll work perfectly for, ranking or not.

ok so here is what im thinking, un-ranked (therefore the experience part is not needed), destroyed/lost/used/used against, permanent and temporary records of:

DMU
Turns
attack
super attack
defence
super defence
intel
assass
command star attack weps
command star defence weps

Sol wrote:ok so here is what im thinking, un-ranked (therefore the experience part is not needed), destroyed/lost/used/used against, permanent and temporary records of:

DMU
Turns
attack
super attack
defence
super defence
intel
assass
command star attack weps
command star defence weps

I think the command stars shouldnt be on there. No one really cares for it and its not a big thing on ascended.

so scrap the command star def/atk weps
I might add a 'total planets ' destroyed as well

Sol wrote:so scrap the command star def/atk weps
I might add a 'total planets ' destroyed as well

Yes, in place of those 2. You can put life force instead, so it would be how much life force you used and how much life force you lost. I think it would be good.

The total planets killed is a good idea.

Rudy Pena wrote:

Sol wrote:so scrap the command star def/atk weps
I might add a 'total planets ' destroyed as well

Yes, in place of those 2. You can put life force instead, so it would be how much life force you used and how much life force you lost. I think it would be good.

The total planets killed is a good idea.

life force lost/destroyed...nice i like it.