[KMA]Avenger wrote:Why?
Is it that difficult to figure out why? It seems logical enough as to why it would go this way and not yours (too much like doom-movies rebuild positive scenario)
[KMA]Avenger wrote:Why?
[KMA]Avenger wrote:numerous civilisations, even to this day...have existed without any form of Govt. so again i ask, why would there be anarchy if all Govt vanished from the face of the earth?
And away with suffrage for people who have achieved nothing in their life. Morons should not be allowed to vote. Only then can a government become a true representation of the people.
Up until recently, I felt that a line should be drawn by intelligence, but I am being flexible and appreciate that certain intellectuals are just that.. lazy beans who sit in their own **Filtered** doing nothing. Those people should not be allowed to vote, and neither should the rest of the population. Only a shepherd needs to vote, not the sheep.Legendary Apophis wrote:Explain this bit?And away with suffrage for people who have achieved nothing in their life. Morons should not be allowed to vote. Only then can a government become a true representation of the people.
Yeah, no, not exactly. Strong people are natural charismatics etcetera, they have a quality which makes them 'strong'. If these 'strong people' are non-conscientious, they are technically 'evil'. No, the 'population' is basically a load of morons. See the above.Legendary Apophis wrote:Also if I understood well, "strong people"="evil people" and "non evil"="morons"?
T-X wrote:Up until recently, I felt that a line should be drawn by intelligence, but I am being flexible and appreciate that certain intellectuals are just that.. lazy beans who sit in their own **Filtered** doing nothing. Those people should not be allowed to vote, and neither should the rest of the population. Only a shepherd needs to vote, not the sheep.Legendary Apophis wrote:Explain this bit?And away with suffrage for people who have achieved nothing in their life. Morons should not be allowed to vote. Only then can a government become a true representation of the people.
MEZZANINE wrote:@ LA, as a pro-EU what do you think of convicted prisoners getting a vote while still server their sentences ? They are NOT decent people by any definition and this is exactly the kind of thing that makes people hate the EU
MEZZANINE wrote:@ LA, as a pro-EU what do you think of convicted prisoners getting a vote while still server their sentences ? They are NOT decent people by any definition and this is exactly the kind of thing that makes people hate the EU
Malx wrote:Make kids not cancer!
Dovahkiin wrote:MEZZANINE wrote:@ LA, as a pro-EU what do you think of convicted prisoners getting a vote while still server their sentences ? They are NOT decent people by any definition and this is exactly the kind of thing that makes people hate the EU
They are still people, and unless they're in prison for treason, I do not see why they should be disallowed voting rights.
MEZZANINE wrote:common sense
MEZZANINE wrote:If you ignore the rights of others, the right not to be robbed, beaten, raped, killed, then you lose your own rights. Thats British law, it's common sense since you dont want prisoners voting for whoever is most lenient on crime & punishment, and if the EU want to interfere and think democracy so important they should step up and have their own leadership elected, and let the people of every EU country vote on joining or leaving them. EU leaders are hypocrites.
Malx wrote:Make kids not cancer!