Page 7 of 11
Re: Haz - Feedback
Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2012 7:42 pm
by Dexter Morgan™
Thanks emp. Btw, if you could, please make sure my warning level is correct. I was told I would be losing points and I have somehow now gotten to level 8.
I recently got a haz warning for saying a slang word quoted from a tv show in a playful way which was not an insult, yet he told me that he was looking and two points should have been verbals and would be changed about 2 months ago, now i am still level 8?
Re: Haz - Feedback
Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2012 8:10 pm
by The Doctor
~Dexter Morgan~™ wrote:Thanks emp. Btw, if you could, please make sure my warning level is correct. I was told I would be losing points and I have somehow now gotten to level 8.
I recently got a haz warning for saying a slang word quoted from a tv show in a playful way which was not an insult, yet he told me that he was looking and two points should have been verbals and would be changed about 2 months ago, now i am still level 8?
Empy has no "jurisdiction" here
Ombudsmans Corner is his area
Where did I say that? I'm looking through my PMs and cant find anything.
EDIT: I just went through your warning history, and I've yet to find any "slang word" warning.
I've gone through and checked each warning, and of the 8 warnings, 4 were from me, 2 from Psyko and 2 from Empy. All seem correct. If you would like specific reasons for each warning, let me know and I will post them.
Re: Haz - Feedback
Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2012 8:30 pm
by Empy
~Dexter Morgan~™ wrote:Thanks emp. Btw, if you could, please make sure my warning level is correct. I was told I would be losing points and I have somehow now gotten to level 8.
I recently got a haz warning for saying a slang word quoted from a tv show in a playful way which was not an insult, yet he told me that he was looking and two points should have been verbals and would be changed about 2 months ago, now i am still level 8?
Personally I don't think you should have been given a verbal warning for the post you did,
and also you do have 2 Board Warnings on your account which should be Verbal Warnings. If that's what you're referring to.*EDIT*
Never mind, all is fine.
Re: Haz - Feedback
Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2012 8:31 pm
by The Doctor
Empy wrote:~Dexter Morgan~™ wrote:Thanks emp. Btw, if you could, please make sure my warning level is correct. I was told I would be losing points and I have somehow now gotten to level 8.
I recently got a haz warning for saying a slang word quoted from a tv show in a playful way which was not an insult, yet he told me that he was looking and two points should have been verbals and would be changed about 2 months ago, now i am still level 8?
Personally I don't think you should have been given a verbal warning for the post you did,
and also you do have 2 Board Warnings on your account which should be Verbal Warnings. If that's what you're referring to.
Which ones?Never mind
Re: Haz - Feedback
Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2012 5:27 pm
by The Doctor
Haz wrote:~Dexter Morgan~™ wrote:Thanks emp. Btw, if you could, please make sure my warning level is correct. I was told I would be losing points and I have somehow now gotten to level 8.
I recently got a haz warning for saying a slang word quoted from a tv show in a playful way which was not an insult, yet he told me that he was looking and two points should have been verbals and would be changed about 2 months ago, now i am still level 8?
Empy has no "jurisdiction" here
Ombudsmans Corner is his area
Where did I say that? I'm looking through my PMs and cant find anything.
EDIT: I just went through your warning history, and I've yet to find any "slang word" warning.
I've gone through and checked each warning, and of the 8 warnings, 4 were from me, 2 from Psyko and 2 from Empy. All seem correct. If you would like specific reasons for each warning, let me know and I will post them.
Bump
Re: Haz - Feedback
Posted: Sat Dec 15, 2012 1:40 pm
by Guild
feedback:
haz is not a good moderator, since ha acquired new power in the structure , he is going through the forum giving warnings out left right and center, verbal warnings included. as they upset the users and put them on edge unnecessarily. making for a less than friendly forum for the players of gateways to use.
he should be removed before you goes power mad
Re: Haz - Feedback
Posted: Sat Dec 15, 2012 1:44 pm
by The Doctor
Guild wrote:feedback:
haz is not a good moderator, since ha acquired new power in the structure , he is going through the forum giving warnings out left right and center, verbal warnings included. as they upset the users and put them on edge unnecessarily. making for a less than friendly forum for the players of gateways to use.
he should be removed before you goes power mad
For one, this would be the first warning of any kind given to any user since the new structure came in. It will most likely be one of the only warnings as I'm technically only responsible for mod administration. I fixed the record with your verbal warning, it shouldn't have been given by me, but should have been given by Andy.
My intention is to not upset users or put them on edge. My intention is to inform them of their rule breaking, so they are informed, and have a chance to fix the problem with the rule being broken.
Re: Haz - Feedback
Posted: Sat Dec 15, 2012 1:47 pm
by Guild
haz you are single handidly ruining people experiances on these forums, sticking to the rules with an iron fist is not the way to go. though some other mods are not exactly great , at least they dont roam the forums wanting to upset people and make the forums a place they dont want to visit
Re: Haz - Feedback
Posted: Sat Dec 15, 2012 1:53 pm
by The Doctor
Guild wrote:haz you are single handidly ruining people experiances on these forums, sticking to the rules with an iron fist is not the way to go. though some other mods are not exactly great , at least they dont roam the forums wanting to upset people and make the forums a place they dont want to visit
The sig violation rule is clear.
And did you not read my last post? I just said I most likely won't be warning users, since I am technically only responsibly for mod administration. I only fixed the record and informed you of it. I was not reprimanding you, only notifying you of what should have been done.
Re: Haz - Feedback
Posted: Sat Dec 15, 2012 1:54 pm
by Guild
if your responsible for mod administration , who is responsible for you ?
Re: Haz - Feedback
Posted: Sat Dec 15, 2012 1:56 pm
by EbilCC
his alliance since they are going to be massed
haz is OTT and a bad mod
Re: Haz - Feedback
Posted: Sat Dec 15, 2012 2:00 pm
by The Doctor
Guild wrote:if your responsible for mod administration , who is responsible for you ?
AdminJ or maybe even Deni (I'm unsure of the latter). Not my alliance.
I don't know how many times I need to repeat this. No longer modding. All I did was fix the record (right now I sound like a broken record!!!).
Re: Haz - Feedback
Posted: Sat Dec 15, 2012 2:02 pm
by Guild
Haz wrote:Guild wrote:if your responsible for mod administration , who is responsible for you ?
AdminJ or maybe even Deni (I'm unsure of the latter). Not my alliance.
I don't know how many times I need to repeat this. No longer modding. All I did was fix the record (right now I sound like a broken record!!!).
sucks to be you
... or cloud
Re: Haz - Feedback
Posted: Sat Dec 15, 2012 2:10 pm
by ~wolverine~
its a **Filtered** sig for petes sake
who gives a **Filtered**
Re: Haz - Feedback
Posted: Sat Dec 15, 2012 2:11 pm
by The Doctor
~Wolverine~ wrote:its a **Filtered** sig for petes sake
who gives a **Filtered**
The sig is no longer a problem. So no one.