Page 1 of 1
(suggestion) Era Alliance Winner..
Posted: Tue Mar 16, 2010 1:21 am
by HippyFool
The winning alliance should go on AVERAGE power rather than TOTAL power. This would bring back some strategy to alliance ranking rather than just hording every player possible and making them get half decent AC lvls.
That is all.
Re: (suggestion) Era Alliance Winner..
Posted: Tue Mar 16, 2010 2:24 am
by Apogryph
HippyFool wrote:The winning alliance should go on AVERAGE power rather than TOTAL power. This would bring back some strategy to alliance ranking rather than just hording every player possible and making them get half decent AC lvls.
That is all.
2nded
Re: (suggestion) Era Alliance Winner..
Posted: Tue Mar 16, 2010 2:28 am
by martin the great
i agree
as does my army of slaves
Re: (suggestion) Era Alliance Winner..
Posted: Tue Mar 16, 2010 2:33 am
by renegadze
Would this not be massively one sided for really small alliance though? say 1-2 players? as they could have really good stats, making their average high.
Before I was massed earlier I would have probably been rank 1 "alliance" if I was on my own.
or base it on player rank
currently 2000 or so people registered?
rank 1 gives 2000 points at the end
rank 2 gives 1999 points and so on
that way you could have less members, but could have better ranks
and maybe have it that only your best 10 alliance members scores count.
Re: (suggestion) Era Alliance Winner..
Posted: Tue Mar 16, 2010 3:48 am
by martin the great
then anyone with less would have a lower rank
crazy chickens only had 4 members last round
why not base it on average power and total power
Re: (suggestion) Era Alliance Winner..
Posted: Tue Mar 16, 2010 4:28 am
by [BoT] Jason
screw the power. anyone can AC snipe the end
base it on average rank.....
Re: (suggestion) Era Alliance Winner..
Posted: Tue Mar 16, 2010 5:23 am
by HippyFool
renegadze wrote:Would this not be massively one sided for really small alliance though? say 1-2 players? as they could have really good stats, making their average high.
Before I was massed earlier I would have probably been rank 1 "alliance" if I was on my own.
or base it on player rank
currently 2000 or so people registered?
rank 1 gives 2000 points at the end
rank 2 gives 1999 points and so on
that way you could have less members, but could have better ranks
and maybe have it that only your best 10 alliance members scores count.
Ah yes you have certainly found a flaw in my idea... If the person with the highest power at the end makes an alliance with themselves in it, they will win....that would be a bit silly lol.
How about top average power... but with a minimum of 5 players? that way you need all of your players to be good, and the alliances with like 30 people might reconsider having inactive players in them...
Re: (suggestion) Era Alliance Winner..
Posted: Tue Mar 16, 2010 10:51 am
by jabujabu
HippyFool wrote:How about top average power... but with a minimum of 5 players? that way you need all of your players to be good, and the alliances with like 30 people might reconsider having inactive players in them...
like how it was supposed to be, but alliances with 3 people still register power