GeneralChaos wrote:Is this not a simple case,
FF posted a URL which lead to a site that had filtered content on it, and got a warning
Mordack posted a URL which lead to a site that had filtered content on it, and didnt get a warning,
Real simple solution no, either remove the warning from FF, or give Mordack one too,
Why do mods always make things far harder than they are, and try and justify why they should not get warnings etc, or are we still stuck in the old times around here, of the, 1 rule for the community, 1 rule for the mods.
the problem therein, is that the filtered content in one link, is in a state of constant flux, due to the presence of a userbase providing the filtered content. whereas the filtered in the other, is in the main media meant to be displayed, thus, much more obvious.
what this means, is unless we ban links altogether, we'd be forced to check up on every link every day, several times a day to make sure the filtered content in the "comments" of the userbase are not filtered, in order to do our "jobs". and of course, giving a warning point for every infraction we find in said user content.
of course, if we did that, there'd be alot more permabanned people.
i personally, am of the opinion that users need to take at least some responsibility for what they post, but they can't see into the future to see when anyone person is going to post filtered content on a link they posted. now, if the filtered content is in the main media of the link, then they need to take responsibility, and thus deserve a warning.