Dubby_CompGamerGeek2 wrote:Nimras wrote:The alliance leader should not be replaced at any chance.
Because that means we can see hostile take overs if they are able to even if you count on the be gone.
Lets say the leader loose his internet that has happen to me.
I had no chance for 6 weeks to get online AT all.
Now with this update that means someone else could take my spot and disband the alliance.
So I've reconsidered my thoughts on voting... and I'm now against it...
and I've editted my posts to reflect this.
However, I get the impression that you saying that you don't trust the 2iC to do what's best for the alliance?
because the 2iC can set war on TDD and Omega Allegiance at the same time, and I'm pretty sure that isn't much better than having the power to disband the alliance... indeed, it could be much worse.
also... there are usually legitimate options to use computers that belong to internet cafes, libraries, schools, etc. to get online... and go to gatewars.
No what i am saying is 2ic and 3ic is the 2 people that can be replaced if they go awhall.
I see no problem in if they go awhall including the leader that one of those 2 spots get changed by vote.
I trust my 2ic and 3ic 100%.
But i just do not wanna see a hostile take over of the alliance which end in disbantion.