Ophidiophobia
-
- Fledgling Forumer
- Posts: 137
- Joined: Mon Aug 08, 2011 10:30 pm
- ID: 0
Re: Ophidiophobia
wheres the photo?
Prior - Prophet - Messiah - Incarnate - LG - LG1 - LG2 - LG3 - LG4- AG - EAG
- AGL - IAG - TAG - PTAG - LTAG - QTAG - KTAG - GAG - TOE - TUS - TUN - TUK
http://stargatewars.herebegames.com/vie ... 8&t=186568
trade feedback ^^^ post it up
- Legendary Apophis
- Forum History
- Posts: 13681
- Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2005 12:54 pm
- Alliance: Generations
- Race: System Lord
- ID: 7889
- Alternate name(s): Apophis the Great
- Location: Ha'TaK
Re: Ophidiophobia
Nigatsu_Aka wrote:Legendary Apophis wrote:As I said in my reply to thread before it was moved, it appeared to me as an obvious poor editing from a porn image, where the woman seem to be abused (look at her face..).
It was a girl who is crying and some persons are trying to indulge her. The edit is made in such a way that only pervs could think of that as a porno image. =)
Post the original then (non edited version), if it's not porn at all and is as you say, you shouldn't have issues with posting it eh?
Last edited by Legendary Apophis on Wed Aug 24, 2011 3:06 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Spoiler
Incarnate - LG - LG1 - LG2 - LG3 - LG4 - AG - EAG ~ AGoL - Completed
Spoiler
<Dmonix> Damnit Jim how come every conversation with you always ends up discussing something deep and meaningful?
<Dmonix> We always end up discussing male/female differences or politics or football
<Dmonix> All the really important issues in life
<Dmonix> We always end up discussing male/female differences or politics or football
<Dmonix> All the really important issues in life
-
- Forum Addict
- Posts: 2760
- Joined: Sat Apr 12, 2008 6:27 am
- ID: 0
Re: Ophidiophobia
Legendary Apophis wrote:Nigatsu_Aka wrote:Legendary Apophis wrote:As I said in my reply to thread before it was moved, it appeared to me as an obvious poor editing from a porn image, where the woman seem to be abused (look at her face..).
It was a girl who is crying and some persons are trying to indulge her. The edit is made in such a way that only pervs could think of that as a porno image. =)
Post the original then, if it's not porn at all and is as you say, you shouldn't have issues with posting it eh?
he did however it got removed
duhh
- Legendary Apophis
- Forum History
- Posts: 13681
- Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2005 12:54 pm
- Alliance: Generations
- Race: System Lord
- ID: 7889
- Alternate name(s): Apophis the Great
- Location: Ha'TaK
Re: Ophidiophobia
~Wolverine~ wrote:Legendary Apophis wrote:Nigatsu_Aka wrote:Legendary Apophis wrote:As I said in my reply to thread before it was moved, it appeared to me as an obvious poor editing from a porn image, where the woman seem to be abused (look at her face..).
It was a girl who is crying and some persons are trying to indulge her. The edit is made in such a way that only pervs could think of that as a porno image. =)
Post the original then, if it's not porn at all and is as you say, you shouldn't have issues with posting it eh?
he did however it got removed
duhh
I meant the original NON edited version...
I didn't see it being posted. I only saw the edited version with "snakes". If the non edited original is not porn at all, I would like to see it, to admit I was wrong...if I am..
Spoiler
Incarnate - LG - LG1 - LG2 - LG3 - LG4 - AG - EAG ~ AGoL - Completed
Spoiler
<Dmonix> Damnit Jim how come every conversation with you always ends up discussing something deep and meaningful?
<Dmonix> We always end up discussing male/female differences or politics or football
<Dmonix> All the really important issues in life
<Dmonix> We always end up discussing male/female differences or politics or football
<Dmonix> All the really important issues in life
-
- Forum Addict
- Posts: 2760
- Joined: Sat Apr 12, 2008 6:27 am
- ID: 0
Re: Ophidiophobia
Tetrismonkey wrote:Why try and post anything explicit? Are you that hungry for an organism you must do so by posting such material for the rest of us to see. Go to a porn site and have some fun there, not here.
dude what you on about. It was about snakes
- Nigatsu_Aka
- Forum Elder
- Posts: 2296
- Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 10:33 pm
Re: Ophidiophobia
Tetrismonkey wrote:Why try and post anything explicit? Are you that hungry for an organism you must do so by posting such material for the rest of us to see. Go to a porn site and have some fun there, not here.
Explicit?!
Actually that pic was supposed to be funny, not explicit.
- Nigatsu_Aka
- Forum Elder
- Posts: 2296
- Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 10:33 pm
Re: Ophidiophobia
There's a topic on this forum (in the debate central?!) somehow related to the pic I posted:
viewtopic.php?f=167&t=184430&hilit=nude
There was possibly nudity included in that picture. I don't see you or anyone having a problem with talking about nudity and/or porn related stuff on this forum.
viewtopic.php?f=167&t=184430&hilit=nude
There was possibly nudity included in that picture. I don't see you or anyone having a problem with talking about nudity and/or porn related stuff on this forum.
- Mordack
- The Spider
- Posts: 4814
- Joined: Sun Nov 13, 2005 4:37 pm
- ID: 8500
- Location: Underneath the spreading chestnut tree
-
Honours and Awards
Re: Ophidiophobia
If anybody who looked at that image, and didn't get what the 'snakes' were, please raise your hand now.
"I bet you thought you'd seen the last of me.."
(TB)
(TB)
- Legendary Apophis
- Forum History
- Posts: 13681
- Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2005 12:54 pm
- Alliance: Generations
- Race: System Lord
- ID: 7889
- Alternate name(s): Apophis the Great
- Location: Ha'TaK
Re: Ophidiophobia
Nigatsu_Aka wrote:There's a topic on this forum (in the debate central?!) somehow related to the pic I posted:
viewtopic.php?f=167&t=184430&hilit=nude
There was possibly nudity included in that picture. I don't see you or anyone having a problem with talking about nudity and/or porn related stuff on this forum.
Oh nice, a thread of mine.
You also noticed the below underlined/bolded/colored part I guess?
It might be a stereotype, I am sorry if that's the case, but still, I want to see what's everyone opinion on the matter.
Why, in the US (well, I don't really know how it is in Canada, so maybe it's same, maybe not), nudity/erotism content (*not* talking about 'pornography') is considered more as a "negative" thing generally, such as being more importantly restricted/censored, than violence and anything surrounding it?
Spoiler
Incarnate - LG - LG1 - LG2 - LG3 - LG4 - AG - EAG ~ AGoL - Completed
Spoiler
<Dmonix> Damnit Jim how come every conversation with you always ends up discussing something deep and meaningful?
<Dmonix> We always end up discussing male/female differences or politics or football
<Dmonix> All the really important issues in life
<Dmonix> We always end up discussing male/female differences or politics or football
<Dmonix> All the really important issues in life
-
- Forum Addict
- Posts: 2760
- Joined: Sat Apr 12, 2008 6:27 am
- ID: 0
Re: Ophidiophobia
Mordack wrote:If anybody who looked at that image, and didn't get what the 'snakes' were, please raise your hand now.
*raises hand* oh wait
- Nigatsu_Aka
- Forum Elder
- Posts: 2296
- Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 10:33 pm
Re: Ophidiophobia
I did see that remark.
Well, imo the pic I posted does not fall in the "pornography" content type. It can be included in the "fun/education" cathegory.
Well, imo the pic I posted does not fall in the "pornography" content type. It can be included in the "fun/education" cathegory.
Legendary Apophis wrote:Nigatsu_Aka wrote:There's a topic on this forum (in the debate central?!) somehow related to the pic I posted:
viewtopic.php?f=167&t=184430&hilit=nude
There was possibly nudity included in that picture. I don't see you or anyone having a problem with talking about nudity and/or porn related stuff on this forum.
Oh nice, a thread of mine.
You also noticed the below underlined/bolded/colored part I guess?It might be a stereotype, I am sorry if that's the case, but still, I want to see what's everyone opinion on the matter.
Why, in the US (well, I don't really know how it is in Canada, so maybe it's same, maybe not), nudity/erotism content (*not* talking about 'pornography') is considered more as a "negative" thing generally, such as being more importantly restricted/censored, than violence and anything surrounding it?
- Mordack
- The Spider
- Posts: 4814
- Joined: Sun Nov 13, 2005 4:37 pm
- ID: 8500
- Location: Underneath the spreading chestnut tree
-
Honours and Awards
Re: Ophidiophobia
Thumbs up to the eunuchs amongst us.
And obviously you know what that image 'looks like' or else you wouldn't have posted it. What point you're trying to prove is beyond me. I can only assume that you have a collection of erotically shaped root vegetables that you're simply dying to début. I dunno, let's see what the ombudsmmanmen think. Lords knows they need something to do.
And obviously you know what that image 'looks like' or else you wouldn't have posted it. What point you're trying to prove is beyond me. I can only assume that you have a collection of erotically shaped root vegetables that you're simply dying to début. I dunno, let's see what the ombudsmmanmen think. Lords knows they need something to do.
"I bet you thought you'd seen the last of me.."
(TB)
(TB)
- Legendary Apophis
- Forum History
- Posts: 13681
- Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2005 12:54 pm
- Alliance: Generations
- Race: System Lord
- ID: 7889
- Alternate name(s): Apophis the Great
- Location: Ha'TaK
Re: Ophidiophobia
Nigatsu_Aka wrote:Also, is this offensive? It's just a tree. If you the pervs see something else, it's not my fault that you watch too much "explicit content".
[spoiler][/spoiler]
The basis (at least for me) is not same. Possible abuse of a woman edited into something else versus a funny tree with people looking at it...not the same.
I am curious to see the non-edited version of the "snakes" picture, if it's really nothing porn at all, you should post it here...
Spoiler
Incarnate - LG - LG1 - LG2 - LG3 - LG4 - AG - EAG ~ AGoL - Completed
Spoiler
<Dmonix> Damnit Jim how come every conversation with you always ends up discussing something deep and meaningful?
<Dmonix> We always end up discussing male/female differences or politics or football
<Dmonix> All the really important issues in life
<Dmonix> We always end up discussing male/female differences or politics or football
<Dmonix> All the really important issues in life
- Nigatsu_Aka
- Forum Elder
- Posts: 2296
- Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 10:33 pm
Re: Ophidiophobia
I don't have to post the original pic to demonstrate that the pic I posted is not "pornographic".
But I will post a pic with a girl showing the same type of grim. I think they're pretty much the same, one is edited (invented), the other is real.
[spoiler][/spoiler]
But I will post a pic with a girl showing the same type of grim. I think they're pretty much the same, one is edited (invented), the other is real.
[spoiler][/spoiler]
Legendary Apophis wrote:Nigatsu_Aka wrote:Also, is this offensive? It's just a tree. If you the pervs see something else, it's not my fault that you watch too much "explicit content".
[spoiler][/spoiler]
The basis (at least for me) is not same. Possible abuse of a woman edited into something else versus a funny tree with people looking at it...not the same.
I am curious to see the non-edited version of the "snakes" picture, if it's really nothing porn at all, you should post it here...
Last edited by Nigatsu_Aka on Wed Aug 24, 2011 3:40 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Drahazar
- Forum Elite
- Posts: 1626
- Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2010 6:04 pm
- Alliance: Judgement
- Race: Divine
- ID: 1957053
- Alternate name(s): Drahazar - Eternal FS Leader
Drahazar - Leader of "The Original Collective" - Location: Creepin', Peepin', Waitin'...
- Contact:
Re: Ophidiophobia
anyone that can understand what the snakes are, is undoubtedly old enough to understand that that picture is not in any way pornographic, where it originates is of no real concern to anyone, if you were to take the mona lisa and paint over her face, it would stop being the mona lisa. If this picture was pornographic, it certainly isn't now.
Arguing this course will never be resolved as people will have different opinions and neither argument will ever bear fruit.
There is nothing in the picture that is pornographic, there are some badly drawn snakes and a woman cowering, none of these things are in any way pornographic, what the artist has done is take something crude, and transformed it into a piece of humor that most i assume, will find tickles them somewhat.
I realize that my 3rd paragraph conflicts with my second, however i too have an opinion.
Arguing this course will never be resolved as people will have different opinions and neither argument will ever bear fruit.
There is nothing in the picture that is pornographic, there are some badly drawn snakes and a woman cowering, none of these things are in any way pornographic, what the artist has done is take something crude, and transformed it into a piece of humor that most i assume, will find tickles them somewhat.
I realize that my 3rd paragraph conflicts with my second, however i too have an opinion.