Page 1 of 2

zirtux vs Replimagni (Fail war)

Posted: Tue Jan 03, 2012 7:31 pm
by I <3 You
The army of zirtux stormed the realm of Replimagni!

zirtux arrived in 50 Mothership.
They were not matched by any defender fleet, thereby being free to rain death from above, out of range of retaliation.
Meanwhile, they landed 300,000 Attack Unit armed as follows:

300,000 Attack Unit have Nanite Disintegrator Satellite **


Opposite this, stood the forces of Replimagni

Replimagni resisted the aggressors with:
125,000 Piper carrying the following arsenal:

125,000 Piper have De-evolutionary Field Generator


In a fury, the two opposing forces clash!


The forces of zirtux rush in full force, and inflict 309,101,055,000 damage on Replimagni's forces!
It was confirmed that 12,500 of Replimagni's forces fell at the hands of zirtux's assult.


The forces of Replimagni fought back with all they could, and managed to inflict 128,010,000,000 damage on zirtux's forces!
They managed to eradicate 150,000 of zirtux's troops.


LOL Is this intended? cause the ratio means that newground reinforces "turtles"

Re: LOL

Posted: Tue Jan 03, 2012 7:34 pm
by Borek
yeah you seem to lose 50% of your strike no matter what, such a joke lol

Re: LOL

Posted: Wed Jan 04, 2012 1:15 am
by RepliMagni
And def weps still weren't damaged :P

Oh well, pretty much evidence this game isn't ever going to take off...

What is even more lol-worthy are these attacks I just did on you:

Attacks on Others (last 10 days)
Time Enemy Result Attacks Enemy Losses Your Losses Damage by You Damage to You Report
03:31 zirtux Attack defended 15 2,326 0 593,320,131 A Huge Amount details
03:31 zirtux Attack defended 15 2,585 0 612,462,427 A Huge Amount details
03:31 zirtux Attack defended 15 2,872 1 574,628,067 A Huge Amount details
03:30 zirtux Attack defended 15 3,191 2 613,893,773 A Huge Amount details
03:30 zirtux Attack defended 15 3,546 4 596,566,951 A Huge Amount details
03:30 zirtux Attack defended 15 3,940 8 626,183,345 A Huge Amount details
03:30 zirtux Attack defended 15 4,378 16 588,438,000 A Huge Amount details
03:30 zirtux Attack defended 15 4,864 31 682,039,422 A Huge Amount details
03:30 zirtux Attack defended 15 5,405 62 636,832,219 A Huge Amount details
03:30 zirtux Attack defended 15 6,005 125 702,568,350 A Huge Amount details
03:30 zirtux Attack defended 15 6,672 250 873,900,300 A Huge Amount details
03:29 zirtux Attack defended 5 1,150 500 95,880,000 A Huge Amount details
03:29 zirtux Attack defended 8 1,020 1,000 102,000,000 A Huge Amount details
03:28 zirtux Attack defended 5 4,602 2,000 383,520,000 A Huge Amount details
03:28 zirtux Attack defended 8 4,161 4,000 416,160,000 A Huge Amount details
03:26 zirtux Attack defended 5 10,590 5,000 979,200,000 A Huge Amount details
03:26 zirtux Attack defended 5 11,750 5,000 979,200,000 A Huge Amount details


So basically you lose half your attacking units no matter what the enemy's def is, whilst they seem to take a standard percentage loss (is it 10%) - but the defender takes the losses NO MATTER WHAT THE ATTACK IS?! Even when I have 0 attackers, you still take the % loss in def troops?!

You can basically mass any def in the game with 1 strike weapon 8-[ (Except def weps don't take damage)

Man this game is fubar....

Re: LOL

Posted: Wed Jan 04, 2012 4:02 am
by I <3 You
Time Enemy Result Attacks Enemy Losses Your Losses Damage by You Damage to You Report
03:33 Replimagni Attack defended 5 0 1 42,310,656,000 100,980 details
03:31 Replimagni Attack defended 15 0 2,326 47,009,820,000 593,320,131 details
03:31 Replimagni Attack defended 15 0 2,585 52,232,164,000 612,462,427 details
03:31 Replimagni Attack defended 15 1 2,872 58,034,248,000 574,628,067 details
03:30 Replimagni Attack defended 15 2 3,191 64,480,712,000 613,893,773 details
03:30 Replimagni Attack defended 15 4 3,546 71,644,276,000 596,566,951 details
03:30 Replimagni Attack defended 15 8 3,940 79,603,720,000 626,183,345 details
03:30 Replimagni Attack defended 15 16 4,378 88,448,568,000 588,438,000 details
03:30 Replimagni Attack defended 15 31 4,864 98,275,136,000 682,039,422 details
03:30 Replimagni Attack defended 15 62 5,405 109,194,524,000 636,832,219 details
03:30 Replimagni Attack defended 15 125 6,005 121,325,912,000 702,568,350 details
03:30 Replimagni Attack defended 15 250 6,672 134,804,640,000 873,900,300 details
03:29 Replimagni Attack defended 5 500 1,150 137,127,640,000 95,880,000 details
03:29 Replimagni Attack defended 8 1,000 1,020 139,188,040,000 102,000,000 details
03:28 Replimagni Attack defended 5 2,000 4,602 148,484,080,000 383,520,000 details
03:28 Replimagni Attack defended 8 4,000 4,161 156,889,300,000 416,160,000 details
03:26 Replimagni Attack defended 5 5,000 10,590 178,281,100,000 979,200,000 details
03:26 Replimagni Attack defended 5 5,000 11,750 202,016,100,000 979,200,000 details

Re: zirtux vs Replimagni (Fail war)

Posted: Wed Jan 04, 2012 4:05 am
by I <3 You
I think I should just buy defence weapons and have them unarmed LOL...

Re: LOL

Posted: Wed Jan 04, 2012 4:10 am
by Juliette
The word you are looking for instead is 'alpha release'.



At least the trains run on time. ;)

[spoiler]
RepliMagni wrote:And def weps still weren't damaged :P

Oh well, pretty much evidence this game isn't ever going to take off...

What is even more lol-worthy are these attacks I just did on you:

Attacks on Others (last 10 days)
Time Enemy Result Attacks Enemy Losses Your Losses Damage by You Damage to You Report
03:31 zirtux Attack defended 15 2,326 0 593,320,131 A Huge Amount details
03:31 zirtux Attack defended 15 2,585 0 612,462,427 A Huge Amount details
03:31 zirtux Attack defended 15 2,872 1 574,628,067 A Huge Amount details
03:30 zirtux Attack defended 15 3,191 2 613,893,773 A Huge Amount details
03:30 zirtux Attack defended 15 3,546 4 596,566,951 A Huge Amount details
03:30 zirtux Attack defended 15 3,940 8 626,183,345 A Huge Amount details
03:30 zirtux Attack defended 15 4,378 16 588,438,000 A Huge Amount details
03:30 zirtux Attack defended 15 4,864 31 682,039,422 A Huge Amount details
03:30 zirtux Attack defended 15 5,405 62 636,832,219 A Huge Amount details
03:30 zirtux Attack defended 15 6,005 125 702,568,350 A Huge Amount details
03:30 zirtux Attack defended 15 6,672 250 873,900,300 A Huge Amount details
03:29 zirtux Attack defended 5 1,150 500 95,880,000 A Huge Amount details
03:29 zirtux Attack defended 8 1,020 1,000 102,000,000 A Huge Amount details
03:28 zirtux Attack defended 5 4,602 2,000 383,520,000 A Huge Amount details
03:28 zirtux Attack defended 8 4,161 4,000 416,160,000 A Huge Amount details
03:26 zirtux Attack defended 5 10,590 5,000 979,200,000 A Huge Amount details
03:26 zirtux Attack defended 5 11,750 5,000 979,200,000 A Huge Amount details


So basically you lose half your attacking units no matter what the enemy's def is, whilst they seem to take a standard percentage loss (is it 10%) - but the defender takes the losses NO MATTER WHAT THE ATTACK IS?! Even when I have 0 attackers, you still take the % loss in def troops?!

You can basically mass any def in the game with 1 strike weapon 8-[ (Except def weps don't take damage)

Man this game is fubar....
[/spoiler]

Re: zirtux vs Replimagni (Fail war)

Posted: Wed Jan 04, 2012 4:33 am
by RepliMagni
Trouble is, I remember universequest which Jason set up as a side project - it had a similar bug as this, but reset every month so everyone just built up on the last turn and spent the rest of the time sniping. Ultimately J gave up on the game without telling anyone....

Kinda think the same thing is/will happen here....

Re: zirtux vs Replimagni (Fail war)

Posted: Wed Jan 04, 2012 6:21 am
by I <3 You
:/ doesnt look/sound good

Re: zirtux vs Replimagni (Fail war)

Posted: Wed Jan 04, 2012 6:23 am
by Juliette
I <3 You wrote::/ doesnt look/sound good
Just Magni being a fool. ;) He has no ground to base his doomsaying on. Commitment to this game is much better compared to UQ.

Re: zirtux vs Replimagni (Fail war)

Posted: Wed Jan 04, 2012 6:26 am
by RepliMagni
Julietta Putina wrote:
I <3 You wrote::/ doesnt look/sound good
Just Magni being a fool. ;) He has no ground to base his doomsaying on. Commitment to this game is much better compared to UQ.


Most of UQ membership went over from here, with Goo as forum admin if I remember correctly. Not to mention Chaos, or the German server, or Battlecorps, or Origins or any number of half-arsed side projects. J does have previous in that respect :P

Anyways, yes. I'm being overly negative. But just a single POST from an admin to let us know they appreciate the beta testing, have looked at the problem, and will be fixing it imminently, would be quite nice.

Otherwise, what's the point in beta testing?

Re: zirtux vs Replimagni (Fail war)

Posted: Wed Jan 04, 2012 6:54 am
by Juliette
RepliMagni wrote:
Julietta Putina wrote:
I <3 You wrote::/ doesnt look/sound good
Just Magni being a fool. ;) He has no ground to base his doomsaying on. Commitment to this game is much better compared to UQ.


Most of UQ membership went over from here, with Goo as forum admin if I remember correctly. Not to mention Chaos, or the German server, or Battlecorps, or Origins or any number of half-arsed side projects. J does have previous in that respect :P

Anyways, yes. I'm being overly negative. But just a single POST from an admin to let us know they appreciate the beta testing, have looked at the problem, and will be fixing it imminently, would be quite nice.

Otherwise, what's the point in beta testing?
True enough. I agree with the last bit. ±P

Re: zirtux vs Replimagni (Fail war)

Posted: Wed Jan 04, 2012 7:54 am
by Borek
Yeah i already consider this as over, i'd delete my account but, oh yeah, i can't, due to a bug that is still unfixed :P

Re: zirtux vs Replimagni (Fail war)

Posted: Wed Jan 04, 2012 8:31 am
by Lithium
actually when it goes live we wont play it as our main acc wont benefit from it, and since theres no feedback then why testing ;)

Re: zirtux vs Replimagni (Fail war)

Posted: Wed Jan 04, 2012 8:52 am
by Juliette
For the children. The next generation. Think of them. Stop being such profit-hunters. ;)

Re: zirtux vs Replimagni (Fail war)

Posted: Wed Jan 04, 2012 9:10 am
by Borek
Pretty obvious how much Jason cares about the "next generation" :smt087