Page 2 of 3

Re: Roket

Posted: Wed May 02, 2012 11:52 am
by HellSinG
~Wolverine~ wrote:id still trade with you... :)


+1

Re: Roket

Posted: Thu May 03, 2012 12:29 pm
by Massacre
"The Worst Things In History, Were Done With the Best of Intentions"

On that note, nothing ever happends to these scammers, oh they got banned? They got deleted? Like once in a blue moon that happends, but only after ripping people off for tons. Roket was most likely an individual that realized that and decided to take the law into his own hands, though not right, and though the final actions are frowned upon...may I point simply that he was trying to do the best he could to make this server better, the scammers drag this server down. Whether his methods were right or wrong, the idea behind it was good, just and right...however the execution of it got him "Blacklisted". Scammers will remain rampant and they will flourish in this society, and the players that try to do something about it will be punished.

Its all about perspective, and Jason, clark i agree with both u guys...but I am taking an unbiased approach to it. Like I said before, I think Roket should be un-blacklisted as a trader, and give the account details to say, Clark who can then decide if giving the account back to a scammer who probably bought it with the money and funds he had scammed from other people....is truely right. You will be doing exactly what he never did for anyone he ever scammed. Now if you can accept that, then by all means you carry out the law no matter what...which is good.

Picture yourself doing a deal with someone, you have 50 bucks to your name ( your a kid ) and you want to buy something, next thing you know, this guy says thanks screw off and the kid is left there pennyless with nothing. Well that's who ur going to give ur account back to. Maybe I exaggerated a tiny bit, but someone that doesn't care who he hurts, why, or when and doesnt give a damn about a person other than himself.

P.S i dont mean to put ur name in there Clark, just somewhat using it as an example and you seem to have been the devils advocate on this topic.

Re: Roket

Posted: Thu May 03, 2012 12:41 pm
by Jim
I would still trade with this guy.

Re: Roket

Posted: Thu May 03, 2012 8:16 pm
by ramen07
I'll go for trades with RoKeT :D

Re: Roket

Posted: Tue May 08, 2012 8:44 am
by judochop
Jim wrote:I would still trade with this guy.

+5

Re: Roket

Posted: Tue May 08, 2012 8:44 am
by judochop
The ineptitude of the administration created a situation in which the appropriate action is self regulation.

Re: Roket

Posted: Tue May 08, 2012 8:51 am
by [BoT] Jason
judochop wrote:The ineptitude of the administration created a situation in which the appropriate action is self regulation.
The often grey and external proof needed to apprehend a scammer is the main cause to the administration not being able to do anything.

Re: Roket

Posted: Tue May 08, 2012 9:38 am
by ramen07
[BoT] Jason wrote:
judochop wrote:The ineptitude of the administration created a situation in which the appropriate action is self regulation.
The often grey and external proof needed to apprehend a scammer is the main cause to the administration not being able to do anything.


But in this case, a scammer cannot 'sue' for damages against their name, nor services unrendered. Not to mention some provide the proof against themselves intentionally...

Re: Roket

Posted: Tue May 08, 2012 9:48 am
by harchester
id trade with him :-D

Re: Roket

Posted: Wed May 09, 2012 5:13 am
by RoKeT
Thanks guys, now it gets tricky... so what if I bought this account off him later :smt047 :smt047 :smt047 would I still be a scammer?

Eric, you have sent $70.00 USD to Bardur arnaldsson.

Thanks for the new account legit now though Fenrir lol

Re: Roket

Posted: Wed May 09, 2012 5:32 am
by Fenrir~
Cant believe i am saying this but i would trade with him again :smt043

Re: Roket

Posted: Sat May 12, 2012 10:02 am
by RoKeT
Can I ask how am I a scammer if the guy I supposidly scammed just posted he'd still trade with me?

Re: Roket

Posted: Sat May 12, 2012 10:05 am
by Clarkey
RoKeT wrote:Can I ask how am I a scammer if the guy I supposidly scammed just posted he'd still trade with me?

Can I ask how you have called Fenrir a scammer when you have traded with him?

What you did was technically a scam, you can't deny that. The difference being is you didn't do it for personal gain and you don't have the intention of scamming innocent people.

But, you will never clear "scammer" from your name if you keep dragging this up again and again. Let it die, best thing to do.

Re: Roket

Posted: Thu May 17, 2012 3:18 pm
by Dmonix
Slightly off topic but doesn't the death penalty affect mass murderers whereas a single murder is not enough to get you the death penalty? Or has the justice system gone full retard?

Image

Also: I've never fully seen eye to eye with RoKeT's opinions, that's probably down to different personalities. I also don't agree with what he did, intentions or not it's just not something a person should do (But that's me talking from an old school sense of self-pride above anything else).

That being said I think this topic is a petty stab at a more personal level than anything else. Fenrir being the person scammed should be the one to start any topic regarding RoKeT as a blacklisted trader but he's nowhere to be seen in this thread.

Re: Roket

Posted: Thu May 17, 2012 3:58 pm
by RoKeT
actually he says he'd still trade with me...

Fenrir~ wrote:Cant believe i am saying this but i would trade with him again :smt043


also didn't he scam multiple times, woudlnt' that make him a "mass scammer" there for recieving the death penalty or in this case scam?