I'm withdrawing. I'm already a moderator and that's enough for now.Gregor Clegane wrote:I volunteer.
Hippy and Goo sounds like a killer combo.
I'm withdrawing. I'm already a moderator and that's enough for now.Gregor Clegane wrote:I volunteer.
ElgCaress wrote:I do not put much value in the 'Legends' or old Q Players and I have my doubts about how they came to win eras repeatedly before the Global Attack Logs were available. I am not saying all of them were 'helped' but I have heard some stories of the 'good ol' days' and would therefor only look at those players that's been around since we have had the GAL made available to us and have proven themselves to be trustworthy and honest.
Neimenljivi wrote:To some extent I agree that things come out. However sometimes the abuse of game mechanics is so precise that people, instead of accuse this kind of behavior, actually condone and applaud it because it's so innovative - even though they don't realize it that more players have thought of it and that they simply chose to play by the book and play fairly - or something like that, especially when a well known player does it. In my opinion the abuse of game mechanics at any point warrants a ban and if an abuser actually wins the era - a removal from Legends page.
I don't think I'd nominate Hippy if I thought he wasn't honorable We've had some differences a long long time ago, but he is one of very few that hold my utmost respect for their honorable play and behavior.
~Jack
sarparto wrote:Will the game cop be able to make the ban match the severity of the crime committed? If someone severly breaks a rule on a first offense, and only loses a day, then that's not much of a deterrent.