Tetrismonkey wrote:Psyko wrote:Tetrismonkey wrote:I would like to ask a question or 2 here. When I posted a Pardon for AGA, it was some parts from him, explaining why he deserved to be unbanned and such. Also, if this is being handled in PMs, I disagree with this 100%. When someone is permabanned, they had 9 chances to get it right. To hide his reasons for being unbanned from the general public is not only wrong, but can be misleading and create a distrust between the Admins and the Ombudsman with the general public.
With that said, may we, the general public please see his reasons for being unbanned?
Nothing has been done via PM in direct regard to DaVinci and this Ombudsman team. So you can go ahead and stop disagreeing with something which is not occurring.
Also, DaVinci is not unbanned. That is still up for discussion between us and the Administration. A public statement will likely be posted as soon as a decision has come to pass.
Again, DaVinci is still banned. He merely has an account which we have asked the Admins to leave open so that he can view/post in this thread, and this thread alone. If he strays outside of that boundary, he can kiss his pardon goodbye.
Make sense?
I never said it didn't...
I merely asked that perhaps he should post reasons for why he SHOULD be unbanned.
Make sense?
Now it does. Your previous post implied DaVinci had already been unbanned and that you were upset with not being told why.
Also, I read your final question (though no other questions seem to exist in your post) as if you wanted to know our reasons for unbanning DaVinci, not DaVinci's reasons for wanting to be unbanned. This could have easily been an issue with me multi-tasking at work.
Thank you for clearing that up. It is up to DaVinci as to whether or not he would like to post about his current reasons for wanting to be pardoned.