Page 1 of 1
HAZ abuse
Posted: Thu Sep 06, 2012 9:48 pm
by R0B3RT
warning without posting this is the last mods abuse ?
mods can decide when 1 war is over ?
mods can ban because someone post a song?
i ask to close the topic openned by haz in galactic colosseum
why when i report nobody look on??
i don.t ask remove my ban because i don.t care
can i have haz id in game
pm me in game
Re: HAZ abuse
Posted: Thu Sep 06, 2012 9:55 pm
by Rudy Peña
No is haz ID.....mass him hard.
I'd rather we kept this thread civil. Thank you. ~Psyko
Re: HAZ abuse
Posted: Thu Sep 06, 2012 9:58 pm
by Duderanch
[*] Both sides must agree a war is over before the thread can be closed. One side cannot request a thread be locked when the other side wishes it to remain open.
From the guidelines posted in the GC by Empy originally written by deni.
Re: HAZ abuse
Posted: Thu Sep 06, 2012 10:02 pm
by R0B3RT
Rudy Pena wrote:No is haz ID.....mass him hard.
you want join the club? for spam
Re: HAZ abuse
Posted: Thu Sep 06, 2012 10:14 pm
by The Doctor
Another one? You were warned for responding to a moderator action.
Re: HAZ abuse
Posted: Thu Sep 06, 2012 10:31 pm
by kaboom
Re: HAZ abuse
Posted: Thu Sep 06, 2012 11:27 pm
by Psyko
This is not an issue within the Ombudsman's power to resolve. However, considering you are banned, I will allow this post to be seen by Haz's GM and the Admins. If they feel further action is necessary, they will contact you.
~Psyko
Re: HAZ abuse
Posted: Fri Sep 07, 2012 12:00 pm
by R0B3RT
1 post 2 warning new rules ??
who find all this bastards on forum ??
who vote them ?
can.t have the lead in real life and show the muscle on internet
Re: HAZ abuse
Posted: Fri Sep 07, 2012 1:11 pm
by The Doctor
R0B3RT wrote:1 post 2 warning new rules ??
who find all this bastards on forum ??
who vote them ?
can.t have the lead in real life and show the muscle on internet
Yes you were warned twice for the same rule, 3 days apart, for different posts.
b. Replies
Replies will be considered spam if they do not contribute to the discussion of the topic, or derail the topic from the intended purpose as defined in the opening post. This may include multiple replies that contain nothing more than emoticons or small words such as ‘lol’. While it is appropriate to indicate something is amusing, drowning out a whole thread with such posts makes it hard to follow for all users.
Note:
Replying to the official post of a Moderator in a topic is spam. Discussing the action that the Moderator has taken belongs in the correct sections of the forum, or in private messages.
Re: HAZ abuse
Posted: Fri Sep 07, 2012 1:32 pm
by R0B3RT
Close it i don.t want see another post from him
i have enought
Re: HAZ abuse
Posted: Fri Sep 07, 2012 1:38 pm
by The Doctor
Did you even wish to appeal the warnings? Or were you just after my ID?
Re: HAZ abuse
Posted: Fri Sep 07, 2012 2:07 pm
by Lithium
is a mod smarter then a half can of a bear
time to ask the other half
Re: HAZ abuse
Posted: Fri Sep 07, 2012 2:09 pm
by lone dragon
not sure about bear but beer sounds a little more palatable.
Re: HAZ abuse
Posted: Fri Sep 07, 2012 2:18 pm
by Juliette
I will raise all the flags in the world when you guys learn not to **Filtered** spam the Ombudsman Corner.
Verbal warnings issued as we have clearly stated here, and in almost every thread in this section, that spam is not tolerated.
(For clarity's sake; these verbals have been issued to Lithium and Lone Dragon, as their 'contributions' are both irrelevant and detracting.)
Additionally; closed at author's request.