Page 2 of 3

Re: Jimmy Savile.

Posted: Tue Oct 23, 2012 5:59 am
by Field Marshall
[KMA]Avenger wrote:
Field Marshall wrote:That said, I have full faith in our judicial system to uncover what evidence they can! :-D



I have zero faith they will go after those who were Saviles-shall we say-"partners" in all this, because unlike Savile, they are still alive and like all crooks will want to get away with their crimes.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/ ... eberg.html

http://libertyblitzkrieg.com/2012/10/15 ... wide-shut/


Then lets hope you are simply wrong and the people abused can get some relief in knowing that the conception of somebody being a good guy is in fact completely incorrect. If others get brought down too, more the better.

If it doesn't, at minimum we will find out about Jimmy, that's something if not enough.

Re: Jimmy Savile.

Posted: Tue Oct 23, 2012 7:48 am
by [KMA]Avenger
When you dig you find it right there in plain sight!



By AARON TINNEY

RUMOURS about Jimmy Savile circulated among broadcasters for years but were thought too dark to be true, TV’s Eamonn Holmes said yesterday.

Eamonn, 52, said one even suggested Savile was a necrophiliac. He added: “That was so ridiculously outrageous you could never believe it.”

The father of four added: “You could look at Jimmy Savile as an eccentric — now you just look upon him as something out of a horror movie.”

Read more: http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/ne ... z2A8anAdYP



Source: http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/ne ... unted.html


This will get worse and worse :(

Re: Jimmy Savile.

Posted: Tue Oct 23, 2012 7:54 am
by Juliette
suggestion from someone who was only indirectly involved = hearsay != evidence

Re: Jimmy Savile.

Posted: Tue Oct 23, 2012 7:59 am
by [KMA]Avenger
Juliette wrote:suggestion from someone who was only indirectly involved = hearsay != evidence




I wasn't trying to imply it was evidence, all i said was when you look you find. info-all info- should be investigated by the individual. what good is it if i tell you the sky on a clear day is blue and you never go out and look for yourself instead choosing to stay locked in your basement? :?

Re: Jimmy Savile.

Posted: Tue Oct 23, 2012 8:32 am
by Dubby_CompGamerGeek2
evidence should come first, not accusations.

that's how people in the real world avoid getting mocked,
and sued for slander, libel, etc.

Re: Jimmy Savile.

Posted: Tue Oct 23, 2012 8:37 am
by Juliette
Dubby_CompGamerGeek2 wrote:evidence should come first, not accusations.

that's how people in the real world avoid getting mocked,
and sued for slander, libel, etc.
Hear, hear! (That was kind of my point earlier, but you put it a lot more clearly. Thanks Dubz.)

Re: Jimmy Savile.

Posted: Tue Oct 23, 2012 9:41 am
by dark lord tacoma
you evidence of necrophilia is the sun news paper ? realy that bastian of good honest journalism ;)


fair enough he was a monster but not all monsters comit every act of evil possable

Re: Jimmy Savile.

Posted: Tue Oct 23, 2012 10:43 am
by [KMA]Avenger
Dubby_CompGamerGeek2 wrote:evidence should come first, not accusations.

that's how people in the real world avoid getting mocked,
and sued for slander, libel, etc.



I hereby accuse the family known as Windsor (AKA-Saxe Coburg Gotha) of of Satanism, drug trafficking, incest, mass murder, genocide, paedophilia and usurpation of the thrown of England. i also accuse Savile of being part of a satanic cult (some of whose members are now deceased and some are still alive and well), which involved paedophilia, murder and sacrifice of children, i further accuse Savile of being a necrophiliac.

My accusations are not limited to the above.


I triple dare anyone from the above mentioned to try and call me a liar in an open court.

Re: Jimmy Savile.

Posted: Tue Oct 23, 2012 10:49 am
by Juliette
Very simple. You, sir, are a liar, and you will spend an eternity on this ship.

[youtube]8l73_1oPKoQ[/youtube]

Re: Jimmy Savile.

Posted: Tue Oct 23, 2012 1:18 pm
by ~wolverine~
i dont get why people are blaming the bbc, when the girls who were to blame didnt come forward while jimmy was alive so they could personally prosecute the prick.

Re: Jimmy Savile.

Posted: Tue Oct 23, 2012 1:26 pm
by Juliette
Not just girls.
Also, yes.. but as far as I can imagine, coming out with "OMG this guy touched/raped me" is not the easiest thing to say. :-k (It might be *too* easy after the culprit perishes though.)

Re: Jimmy Savile.

Posted: Tue Oct 23, 2012 10:11 pm
by [KMA]Avenger
~Wolverine~ wrote:i dont get why people are blaming the bbc, when the girls who were to blame didnt come forward while jimmy was alive so they could personally prosecute the prick.




People did try to expose him on more than just 1 occasion. some people even reported him to the police as well as the BBC. on all occasions it was buried.

Re: Jimmy Savile.

Posted: Wed Oct 24, 2012 4:05 am
by Jim
Legendary Apophis wrote:He ruined the name Jim/Jimmy.

Totally agree with you.

Also, as others said, clearly a pedo but I somehow doubt the whole necro satanist royalist stuff...

Re: Jimmy Savile.

Posted: Wed Oct 24, 2012 9:04 am
by ~wolverine~
Jim wrote:
Legendary Apophis wrote:He ruined the name Jim/Jimmy.

Totally agree with you.

Also, as others said, clearly a pedo but I somehow doubt the whole necro satanist royalist stuff...


lulz

I also think that the bbc are hiding it because theres a ring of pedos in the managers of bbc. Arent like 6 of them in investigation?

Re: Jimmy Savile.

Posted: Wed Oct 24, 2012 9:35 am
by Juliette
Jim wrote:
Legendary Apophis wrote:He ruined the name Jim/Jimmy.
Totally agree with you.
Who said what now? :-k :smt042

Ah well, there will always be criminals, and sometimes they suck at their criminal activity and get caught. (Or they die, and then people dare speak up - long gone is de mortuis nil nisi bonum.)