Page 1 of 4

Discussion for/against HAZ

Posted: Wed Oct 31, 2012 2:58 pm
by Juliette
Haz does his job excellently, is balanced, and does not get frustrated when people mass him in game. In fact, I have not seen him take anything from the game into his modding.
Does he warn people? Hell yes, that is part of his responsibility. If you cannot handle a warning, do not break the rules. It is so simple; rules are easy, read them, remember them, and do not **Filtered** troll. ;)


Rob, domnul, take it in stride and move on. :D

Re: vote no for HAZ

Posted: Wed Oct 31, 2012 3:08 pm
by The Doctor
Juliette wrote:Haz does his job excellently, is balanced, and does not get frustrated when people mass him in game. In fact, I have not seen him take anything from the game into his modding.
Does he warn people? Hell yes, that is part of his responsibility. If you cannot handle a warning, do not break the rules. It is so simple; rules are easy, read them, remember them, and do not **Filtered** troll. ;)


Rob, domnul, take it in stride and move on. :D


I think that covers the important part... :D

Re: vote no for HAZ

Posted: Wed Oct 31, 2012 4:52 pm
by ~Odin~
Moved to correct section [-X

Re: vote no for HAZ

Posted: Wed Oct 31, 2012 4:57 pm
by The Doctor
Come on guys, please try to keep this on topic... as much as I find this whole thread a joke, we should hear it out...

Re: vote no for HAZ

Posted: Wed Oct 31, 2012 5:25 pm
by Juliette
Yes, that is exactly what not happened! :D

Re: vote no for HAZ

Posted: Wed Oct 31, 2012 6:16 pm
by Empy
Haz wrote:as much as I find this whole thread a joke
I think I found the answer to your question.

Re: vote no for HAZ

Posted: Thu Nov 01, 2012 12:06 am
by R0B3RT
why? because haz is a bull
last action vs dexter :smt047
you can.t ban just because you have a button :smt019

Re: vote no for HAZ

Posted: Thu Nov 01, 2012 12:37 am
by Zeratul
actually we can... (but it ain't done without reason)

Re: vote no for HAZ

Posted: Thu Nov 01, 2012 12:47 am
by The Doctor
R0B3RT wrote:why? because haz is a bull
last action vs dexter :smt047
you can.t ban just because you have a button :smt019


I warned him for his post (you know, the one you reported), and that brought him to his 3rd warning, which means a ban.

Re: vote no for HAZ

Posted: Thu Nov 01, 2012 5:36 am
by R0B3RT
ban for what ?' just a bull can warn him for nothing
come on use your head not button :smt019

Re: vote no for HAZ

Posted: Sat Nov 03, 2012 6:37 am
by R0B3RT
mods have button and use it without use head like a robot ( not all )
we don.t have the choice to vote them ](*,)
we can just ignore #-o

Re: vote no for HAZ

Posted: Sat Nov 03, 2012 7:00 am
by The Doctor
Preem Palver wrote:P.S. This discussion has itself gotten pretty off-topic, hasn't it?


Not that it matters, I think this thread is kind of a joke... I've yet to see any valid proof behind any accusations against me. And even if it isn't a joke, the opinions of a few users won't get rid of me :P

R0B3RT wrote:ban for what ?' just a bull can warn him for nothing
come on use your head not button :smt019


Oops missed this post... as said before you posted this:

Haz wrote:I warned him for his post (you know, the one you reported), and that brought him to his 3rd warning, which means a ban.


I think that answers your question :)

Re: vote no for HAZ

Posted: Sat Nov 03, 2012 7:05 am
by Sphinx42
Haz wrote:
Preem Palver wrote:P.S. This discussion has itself gotten pretty off-topic, hasn't it?


Not that it matters, I think this thread is kind of a joke... I've yet to see any valid proof behind any accusations against me. And even if it isn't a joke, the opinions of a few users won't get rid of me :P


That's kind of how I like things to be run (be it a forum, an alliance, or anything like that). Everyone jokes around, they get on with their business, spambots and the like get banned, and most everyone lives happily (or grumpily, or however they prefer) ever after.

Re: vote no for HAZ

Posted: Sat Nov 03, 2012 8:10 am
by R0B3RT
Haz wrote:
Preem Palver wrote:P.S. This discussion has itself gotten pretty off-topic, hasn't it?


Not that it matters, I think this thread is kind of a joke... I've yet to see any valid proof behind any accusations against me. And even if it isn't a joke, the opinions of a few users won't get rid of me :P

R0B3RT wrote:ban for what ?' just a bull can warn him for nothing
come on use your head not button :smt019


Oops missed this post... as said before you posted this:

Haz wrote:I warned him for his post (you know, the one you reported), and that brought him to his 3rd warning, which means a ban.


I think that answers your question :)

nothing wrong in dexter post so that prove you are a robot not a moderator :smt021
dictator :-D with button :smt019

p.s. long time ago i did this forum is not sgw forum
i don.t care about :smt043
i hope in future mods can warn mods because the other player no post here

Re: vote no for HAZ

Posted: Sat Nov 03, 2012 8:49 am
by The Doctor
R0B3RT wrote:
Haz wrote:
Preem Palver wrote:P.S. This discussion has itself gotten pretty off-topic, hasn't it?


Not that it matters, I think this thread is kind of a joke... I've yet to see any valid proof behind any accusations against me. And even if it isn't a joke, the opinions of a few users won't get rid of me :P

R0B3RT wrote:ban for what ?' just a bull can warn him for nothing
come on use your head not button :smt019


Oops missed this post... as said before you posted this:

Haz wrote:I warned him for his post (you know, the one you reported), and that brought him to his 3rd warning, which means a ban.


I think that answers your question :)

nothing wrong in dexter post so that prove you are a robot not a moderator :smt021
dictator :-D with button :smt019

p.s. long time ago i did this forum is not sgw forum
i don.t care about :smt043
i hope in future mods can warn mods because the other player no post here

His post was in response to a mod action. At the time, the action for that was a board warning., He was given a warning, which meant he was also banned, as his warning count was 3.

Also, made a slight error, you did not report the post that earnt him his 3rd warning, so I apologise for saying that you did.