Page 2 of 4

Re: again

Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2012 3:31 pm
by R0B3RT
after dp and kjarkur posted sex **Filtered** in forum i asked if desert phantom if is drunk ?
and i got another message from this stupid moderator called haz

nobody can give him a calm down ??
heeeeiiiii :smt100 :smt100 :smt100 :smt100 :smt100 :smt100 :smt100 :smt100 :smt100 :smt100 :smt100

Re: again

Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2012 3:33 pm
by R0B3RT
a warrning now WTH

Re: again

Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2012 3:34 pm
by Guild
because robert is in a vendetta with haz, it would seem that haz is not able to act without biast, shouldnt another mod manage this ??

as it seems rob is being targetted by haz

Re: again

Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2012 3:36 pm
by Empy
Yes I agree Haz should stop moderating R0B3RT and leave it up to others.

Also, due to Admin Jason's changes Haz is not answerable to anyone but absent Admin Jason, so there is nothing to do about him unfairly enforcing the "Spam" rule as he always has.

Re: again

Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2012 3:37 pm
by R0B3RT
after sex party on forum i asked desert phantom if is drunk all it
warn for that?

Re: again

Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2012 3:42 pm
by The Doctor
Guild wrote:because robert is in a vendetta with haz, it would seem that haz is not able to act without biast, shouldnt another mod manage this ??

as it seems rob is being targetted by haz


Actually, there is no vendetta, as I am now on vac. I modded his (and others) posts in a DDE vs OE war thread, and only gave him a verbal warning, not a board warning for his posts.

Also, just because a moderator mods a post while "in a vendetta" with the user being modded, that does not automatically make the mod biased. A mod can only be biased if they warn a user without a valid reason, which is not the case here.

Re: again

Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2012 3:45 pm
by Guild
you being on vac does not mean you are out of a vendetta, when you come back rob will still vendetta you

you know this and so maintain bias.

no it does not mean that you are always bias , but in this case it seems you are bias.

you show all the signs I'm afraid

Re: again

Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2012 3:46 pm
by The Doctor
R0B3RT wrote:after sex party on forum i asked desert phantom if is drunk all it
warn for that?


Verbal warning, yes. As it was not on topic. Just like the other posts by a few other users, who were modded and appropriately warned.

Re: again

Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2012 3:48 pm
by R0B3RT
Haz wrote:
Guild wrote:because robert is in a vendetta with haz, it would seem that haz is not able to act without biast, shouldnt another mod manage this ??

as it seems rob is being targetted by haz


Actually, there is no vendetta, as I am now on vac. I modded his (and others) posts in a DDE vs OE war thread, and only gave him a verbal warning, not a board warning for his posts.

Also, just because a moderator mods a post while "in a vendetta" with the user being modded, that does not automatically make the mod biased. A mod can only be biased if they warn a user without a valid reason, which is not the case here.

you are in vendetta with me until i play this game
show my post and did what i do wrong ?
i don.t wan.t see your name in pm thanks

not on topic ??
desert phantom posted thing like suck and double penetration
i asked if is drunk
i.m off topic ????come on

Re: again

Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2012 3:48 pm
by The Doctor
Guild wrote:you being on vac does not mean you are out of a vendetta, when you come back rob will still vendetta you

you know this and so maintain bias.

no it does not mean that you are always bias , but in this case it seems you are bias.

you show all the signs I'm afraid


What signs? With the verbal warning I just gave him for offtopic... how is that bias?

I never accepted the vendetta, and do not see his ingame actions as worthy of note for my forum modding. I keep forum and ingame separate (something a mod should always be doing).

I fail to see any "signs" of biased actions.

Re: again

Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2012 3:49 pm
by The Doctor
R0B3RT wrote:
Haz wrote:
Guild wrote:because robert is in a vendetta with haz, it would seem that haz is not able to act without biast, shouldnt another mod manage this ??

as it seems rob is being targetted by haz


Actually, there is no vendetta, as I am now on vac. I modded his (and others) posts in a DDE vs OE war thread, and only gave him a verbal warning, not a board warning for his posts.

Also, just because a moderator mods a post while "in a vendetta" with the user being modded, that does not automatically make the mod biased. A mod can only be biased if they warn a user without a valid reason, which is not the case here.

you are in vendetta with me until i play this game
show my post and did what i do wrong ?
i don.t wan.t see your name in pm thanks

not on topic ??
desert phantom posted thing like suck and double penetration
i asked if is drunk
i.m off topic ????come on


Is asking if he is drunk related to the ingame war, which is the topic of that thread? And as I said, he was modded and warned for it.

Re: again

Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2012 3:51 pm
by Guild
Haz wrote:
Guild wrote:you being on vac does not mean you are out of a vendetta, when you come back rob will still vendetta you

you know this and so maintain bias.

no it does not mean that you are always bias , but in this case it seems you are bias.

you show all the signs I'm afraid


What signs? With the verbal warning I just gave him for offtopic... how is that bias?

I never accepted the vendetta, and do not see his ingame actions as worthy of note for my forum modding. I keep forum and ingame separate (something a mod should always be doing).

I fail to see any "signs" of biased actions.


the fact that your actions may well be leading to a war upon your alliance, this may concern you and make you angry and in turn bias.

I am sure that there are members of this forum, who can vouch for your rash warnings and times of bias

Re: again

Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2012 3:53 pm
by Empy
I think the verbal he gave R0B3RT was fine, he contributed to derailing the thread.

Moderators are not supposed to mod anyone they're at war with, or in a vendetta with though.

Re: again

Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2012 3:54 pm
by The Doctor
Guild wrote:
Haz wrote:
Guild wrote:you being on vac does not mean you are out of a vendetta, when you come back rob will still vendetta you

you know this and so maintain bias.

no it does not mean that you are always bias , but in this case it seems you are bias.

you show all the signs I'm afraid


What signs? With the verbal warning I just gave him for offtopic... how is that bias?

I never accepted the vendetta, and do not see his ingame actions as worthy of note for my forum modding. I keep forum and ingame separate (something a mod should always be doing).

I fail to see any "signs" of biased actions.


the fact that your actions may well be leading to a war upon your alliance, this may concern you and make you angry and in turn bias.

I am sure that there are members of this forum, who can vouch for your rash warnings and times of bias


To be honest, I hadn't even given a thought about HVE in this. Like I said, ingame and forum separate.

Also, anger towards a user does not mean bias either.

bi·as
/ˈbīəs/
Noun
Prejudice in favor of or against one thing, person, or group compared with another, usually in a way considered to be unfair.


I have no prejudice towards any user. If they break a rule, I mod it and give the consequences appropriately. As I'm sure you've seen, I've even warned HVE members on this forum.

Re: again

Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2012 3:56 pm
by R0B3RT
if alliance member start loose stats made him a good mod ??