StarGateWars Forums

just to be 100% i wouldnt mind a check, and proof of said check

Feel free. Nothing to hide, to my knowledge.

so you can say as true as you being comatosed, that you do not post on behalf of the forum account gregor clegane, and hendce no control te ccound coressponding to it

Nothing untoward is going on. *grin*

(You should type more carefully. I barely understood that.)

minisaiyan wrote:so you can say as true as you being in a coma once upon a time, that you do not post on behalf of the forum account gregor clegane, and also that you have no control of the account corresponding to it

fixed. now dont avoid the question please.

minisaiyan wrote:

minisaiyan wrote:so you can say as true as you being in a coma, that you do not post on behalf of the forum account gregor clegane, and hende no control the account corresponding to it

fixed. now dont avoid the question please.

Your question is misleading. As for 'fixed'..

1. I was never in a coma (you know that). So if I were to say something equally true, it would be something like, "green is red".. misleading, sir.
2. I do occasionally post on behalf of Clegane (lol, he tells me f2f), but never using his forum account.
3. I have no control over Clegane's account (game/forum) beyond my personal relationship with him.
4. I cannot log in to either account.

Leave this to admin.

Juliette wrote:

minisaiyan wrote:

minisaiyan wrote:so you can say as true as you being in a coma, that you do not post on behalf of the forum account gregor clegane, and hende no control the account corresponding to it

fixed. now dont avoid the question please.

Your question is misleading. As for 'fixed'..

1. I was never in a coma (you know that). So if I were to say something equally true, it would be something like, "green is red".. misleading, sir.

you post on behalf of more than one person, so this statement is more than irrlevant. howver, this is an admission you have lied previously and thereforem future lies are to be aknost expected

Juliette wrote:2. I do occasionally post on behalf of Clegane (lol, he tells me f2f), but never using his forum account.

the latter, i doubt given Clegane's writing style

Juliette wrote:03. I have no control over Clegane's account (game/forum) beyond my personal relationship with him.

This does not state that you are not him, nor does it mean that your personal relationship is not a relationship involving the sharing of accounts

Juliette wrote:4. I cannot log in to either account.

ambiguous, to say the least

Juliette wrote: Leave this to admin.

assuming that by admin you mean our ever present panel of multi finders, yes, lets allow our active unbiased panel let this case go either unread or laughed at, uninvestigated.

minisaiyan wrote:

Juliette wrote:

minisaiyan wrote:

minisaiyan wrote:so you can say as true as you being in a coma, that you do not post on behalf of the forum account gregor clegane, and hende no control the account corresponding to it

fixed. now dont avoid the question please.

Your question is misleading. As for 'fixed'..

1. I was never in a coma (you know that). So if I were to say something equally true, it would be something like, "green is red".. misleading, sir.

you post on behalf of more than one person, so this statement is more than irrlevant. howver, this is an admission you have lied previously and thereforem future lies are to be aknost expected

Juliette wrote:2. I do occasionally post on behalf of Clegane (lol, he tells me f2f), but never using his forum account.

the latter, i doubt given Clegane's writing style

Juliette wrote:03. I have no control over Clegane's account (game/forum) beyond my personal relationship with him.

This does not state that you are not him, nor does it mean that your personal relationship is not a relationship involving the sharing of accounts

Juliette wrote:4. I cannot log in to either account.

ambiguous, to say the least

Juliette wrote: Leave this to admin.

assuming that by admin you mean our ever present panel of multi finders, yes, lets allow our active unbiased panel let this case go either unread or laughed at, uninvestigated.

I think you're in the wrong side of the argument. I believe most places go as "innocent until proven guilty." You, however, are taking the approach, "you're guilty unless you can prove you're innocent." That's a bad, bad place to be my friend. And relatively unfair.

@cjl: By that logic, none of what you say can be taken seriously because a while ago, you made a joke.
Reconsider that line of thinking.

As for 'admin', I mean the site owner, the guy I work with on a near-daily basis, and whom I trust to make a fair judgement. *grin* I think he would know if I was cheating, n'est-ce pas?

@everyone else: sorry for feeding this one, but I have nothing better to do since my PC blew up, woe is me.



Additionally, how do you prove you do not do something?

again you do not deny you multi. nobody can or will without lying.

I love when people use words to try and solve a problem.
language is redundant. Logic is not redundant.

minisaiyan wrote:again you do not deny you multi. nobody can or will without lying.

I love when people use words to try and solve a problem.
language is redundant. Logic is not redundant.

I can say I don't without lying. Quite easily

to define more specifically, nobody can say that juliette does not multi in some form without lying.

Proxies are amazing things to hide original IPs....

Tetrismonkey wrote:Proxies are amazing things to hide original IPs....

That's why you do everything based on Mac addresses

minisaiyan wrote:again you do not deny you multi.

I have no multi, outside the forum.

If you have such irrefutable proof that allows you to use your absolutes, oh logician, show us. Or show admin. *grin*