Page 4 of 5
Re: Why is this..
Posted: Sun Mar 17, 2013 4:47 pm
by jedi~tank
~Odin~ wrote:Haz wrote:Juliette wrote:Haz wrote:There isn't an option for users to block other users, so why should there be one to block mods?
There is.
ucp.php?i=pm&mode=optionsAdd New Rule
"If SENDER"
"is"
{{NAME}}
"Delete Message"
That doesn't block the PM, it deletes the PM. Which is not good if he were to receive a warning from Odin.
How about we try this?
Odin, could you please refrain from PMing Jedi Tank, unless it is for official moderator business?
Im not sure Haz, JT calling me and my friends "fags" which is an offensive term in my eyes and in the eyes of people that share the same sexual orientation as myself. I do not wish to clog this thread up with another discussion on such a topic so it would help to keep this thread clean if i pm'ed JT and we could chat this out there. Otherwise it would all have to remain here.
There should be nothing to discuss, based on the rules quoted to myself and warned, and the same rule quoted to rob3rt and him being banned coupled with the posts of yours I reported, you should have warnings that would exceed the limit thus resulting in you being banned.
Re: Why is this..
Posted: Sun Mar 17, 2013 4:48 pm
by The Doctor
~Odin~ wrote:Haz wrote:Juliette wrote:Haz wrote:There isn't an option for users to block other users, so why should there be one to block mods?
There is.
ucp.php?i=pm&mode=optionsAdd New Rule
"If SENDER"
"is"
{{NAME}}
"Delete Message"
That doesn't block the PM, it deletes the PM. Which is not good if he were to receive a warning from Odin.
How about we try this?
Odin, could you please refrain from PMing Jedi Tank, unless it is for official moderator business?
Im not sure Haz, JT calling me and my friends "fags" which is an offensive term in my eyes and in the eyes of people that share the same sexual orientation as myself. I do not wish to clog this thread up with another discussion on such a topic so it would help to keep this thread clean if i pm'ed JT and we could chat this out there. Otherwise it would all have to remain here.
How about not PMing him unless it is properly related to a topic of discussion? Not a "lulz" PM at JTs ban, for example? If he is calling you a fag, defend yourself if you feel the need to, but don't PM him with irrelevant messages? Fair? And JT can do the same?
Re: Why is this..
Posted: Sun Mar 17, 2013 4:49 pm
by jedi~tank
Haz wrote:~Odin~ wrote:Haz wrote:Juliette wrote:Haz wrote:There isn't an option for users to block other users, so why should there be one to block mods?
There is.
ucp.php?i=pm&mode=optionsAdd New Rule
"If SENDER"
"is"
{{NAME}}
"Delete Message"
That doesn't block the PM, it deletes the PM. Which is not good if he were to receive a warning from Odin.
.
How about we try this?
Odin, could you please refrain from PMing Jedi Tank, unless it is for official moderator business?
Im not sure Haz, JT calling me and my friends "fags" which is an offensive term in my eyes and in the eyes of people that share the same sexual orientation as myself. I do not wish to clog this thread up with another discussion on such a topic so it would help to keep this thread clean if i pm'ed JT and we could chat this out there. Otherwise it would all have to remain here.
How about not PMing him unless it is properly related to a topic of discussion? Not a "lulz" PM at JTs ban, for example? If he is calling you a fag, defend yourself if you feel the need to, but don't PM him with irrelevant messages? Fair? And JT can do the same?
No, I do not want any pm's from any user of this forum except mod actions
Re: Why is this..
Posted: Sun Mar 17, 2013 4:51 pm
by Juliette
Haz wrote:Juliette wrote:Haz wrote:There isn't an option for users to block other users, so why should there be one to block mods?
There is.
ucp.php?i=pm&mode=optionsAdd New Rule
"If SENDER"
"is"
{{NAME}}
"Delete Message"
That doesn't block the PM, it deletes the PM. Which is not good if he were to receive a warning from Odin.
Oi. It does not work when one of the parties involved is a moderator. So no risk of that.
My point is, that there IS an option for users to block other users..
Re: Why is this..
Posted: Sun Mar 17, 2013 4:53 pm
by ~Odin~
Jedi~Tank wrote:Haz wrote:~Odin~ wrote:Haz wrote:Juliette wrote:Haz wrote:There isn't an option for users to block other users, so why should there be one to block mods?
There is.
ucp.php?i=pm&mode=optionsAdd New Rule
"If SENDER"
"is"
{{NAME}}
"Delete Message"
That doesn't block the PM, it deletes the PM. Which is not good if he were to receive a warning from Odin.
.
How about we try this?
Odin, could you please refrain from PMing Jedi Tank, unless it is for official moderator business?
Im not sure Haz, JT calling me and my friends "fags" which is an offensive term in my eyes and in the eyes of people that share the same sexual orientation as myself. I do not wish to clog this thread up with another discussion on such a topic so it would help to keep this thread clean if i pm'ed JT and we could chat this out there. Otherwise it would all have to remain here.
How about not PMing him unless it is properly related to a topic of discussion? Not a "lulz" PM at JTs ban, for example? If he is calling you a fag, defend yourself if you feel the need to, but don't PM him with irrelevant messages? Fair? And JT can do the same?
No, I do not want any pm's from any user of this forum except mod actions
once again u could try
There is.
ucp.php?i=pm&mode=options
Add New Rule
"If SENDER"
"is"
{{NAME}}
"Delete Message"
however if u do that and u say u havent seen a warning by me (given for a market violation as im a market mod) then it wont float.
Re: Why is this..
Posted: Sun Mar 17, 2013 6:21 pm
by DaDigi
Re: Why is this..
Posted: Sun Mar 17, 2013 6:57 pm
by Psyko
Stop spamming this thread.
If users do not have anything to say which contributes to the topic at hand, they should not be posting. This includes the numerous posts which contain nothing more than emoticons.
Keep on topic and quit with the spam.
Please and thank you.
~Psyko
Re: Why is this..
Posted: Sun Mar 17, 2013 8:15 pm
by Rudy Peña
Jedi~Tank wrote:Haz wrote:~Odin~ wrote:Haz wrote:Juliette wrote:Haz wrote:There isn't an option for users to block other users, so why should there be one to block mods?
There is.
ucp.php?i=pm&mode=optionsAdd New Rule
"If SENDER"
"is"
{{NAME}}
"Delete Message"
That doesn't block the PM, it deletes the PM. Which is not good if he were to receive a warning from Odin.
.
How about we try this?
Odin, could you please refrain from PMing Jedi Tank, unless it is for official moderator business?
Im not sure Haz, JT calling me and my friends "fags" which is an offensive term in my eyes and in the eyes of people that share the same sexual orientation as myself. I do not wish to clog this thread up with another discussion on such a topic so it would help to keep this thread clean if i pm'ed JT and we could chat this out there. Otherwise it would all have to remain here.
How about not PMing him unless it is properly related to a topic of discussion? Not a "lulz" PM at JTs ban, for example? If he is calling you a fag, defend yourself if you feel the need to, but don't PM him with irrelevant messages? Fair? And JT can do the same?
No, I do not want any pm's from any user of this forum except mod actions
http://talk.gatewa.rs/ucp.php?i=165
Allow users to send you private messages:
Note that administrators and moderators will always be able to send you messages. Yes No
Click No, if you dont want PMs from anyone.
Re: Why is this..
Posted: Mon Mar 18, 2013 4:24 am
by jedi~tank
Yea no **Filtered** shirlock
Re: Why is this..
Posted: Mon Mar 18, 2013 4:28 am
by The Doctor
Jedi~Tank wrote:Yea no **Filtered** shirlock
Well if he continues to PM you after you set that (excluding mod duties), he would be abusing his mod status, so can't PM you anymore. Problem solved?
Re: Why is this..
Posted: Mon Mar 18, 2013 4:36 am
by jedi~tank
Haz wrote:Jedi~Tank wrote:Yea no **Filtered** shirlock
Well if he continues to PM you after you set that (excluding mod duties), he would be abusing his mod status, so can't PM you anymore. Problem solved?
That line has already been crossed. And why should I have to block everyone just to block some ass that can't be blocked anyway?
](./images/smilies/eusa_wall.gif "Brick wall")
Re: Why is this..
Posted: Mon Mar 18, 2013 4:37 am
by Juliette
Jedi~Tank wrote:And why should I have to block everyone just to block some ass that can't be blocked anyway?
Exactly.
Re: Why is this..
Posted: Mon Mar 18, 2013 4:46 am
by The Doctor
Jedi~Tank wrote:And why should I have to block everyone just to block some ass that can't be blocked anyway?
No one said you had to. You were the one who said that you wanted to block every PM except for mod PMs. You still have the alternative of using the "add new rule" filter thing... Both have their pros and cons...
Re: Why is this..
Posted: Mon Mar 18, 2013 4:52 am
by jedi~tank
Haz wrote:Jedi~Tank wrote:And why should I have to block everyone just to block some ass that can't be blocked anyway?
No one said you had to. You were the one who said that you wanted to block every PM except for mod PMs. You still have the alternative of using the "add new rule" filter thing... Both have their pros and cons...
Uninvolve yourself haz, Psy can handle this.
Re: Why is this..
Posted: Mon Mar 18, 2013 6:07 am
by The Doctor
Jedi~Tank wrote:Haz wrote:Jedi~Tank wrote:And why should I have to block everyone just to block some ass that can't be blocked anyway?
No one said you had to. You were the one who said that you wanted to block every PM except for mod PMs. You still have the alternative of using the "add new rule" filter thing... Both have their pros and cons...
Uninvolve yourself haz, Psy can handle this.
I try to help someone...
