Page 1 of 2

caprila

Posted: Sat May 31, 2014 10:42 pm
by R0B3RT
Caprila
Dark Valkyrie
[ TÅÅE - WilcoOwnsMe]
Disciples of Amun (Swiftness)
Dormant UnKnown of the INDU
{On The Cusp of A Black Hole...}
{Temporarily on the Protected Planets Treaty...}

that mod can.t be allowed to warn all dde on forum
because we are in war

Re: caprila

Posted: Sat May 31, 2014 11:22 pm
by Jack
R0B3RT wrote:that mod can.t be allowed to warn all dde on forum
because we are in war
Can't? Who says? Not you, you don't get to say. :smt047

Re: caprila

Posted: Sat May 31, 2014 11:55 pm
by IFLuX
Jack vs Robert
1 : 0

Re: caprila

Posted: Sun Jun 01, 2014 12:42 am
by Caprila
The iron rack cares not for the person lying upon it,
not their race, alliance, or allegiance
by the end of the day, all screams sound alike

Re: caprila

Posted: Sun Jun 01, 2014 3:06 am
by R0B3RT
after i get 2 warn in this mode

[spoiler]The following is a warning which has been issued to you by an administrator or moderator of this site.
Quote:
5 account not 2
i don.t give more details because caprila need play this game before ask details :-D

and surprize ... is omegan :smt043

***

i share with a bull my proof?
a punch in your hippo face all you can have :-"

***

This is a warning regarding the following post made by you: viewtopic.php?f=209&p=2596073#p2596073 .

Section 4: Spam
a. Topics.
Topics will be considered spam if they fit into one of three categories.
i) They appear in the wrong section of the board.
ii) The poster has made more topics than is reasonable for one user within the day. A moderator will judge this based upon the topics created and where they are created at.
iii) The topic has already been locked by a moderator and the user has reposted the topic.

b. Replies
Replies will be considered spam if they do not contribute to the discussion of the topic, or derail the topic from the intended purpose as defined in the opening post. This may include multiple replies that contain nothing more than emoticons or small words such as ‘lol’. While it is appropriate to indicate something is amusing, drowning out a whole thread with such posts makes it hard to follow for all users. Replying to an official moderator post in topic will be considered spam. Should a user wish to reply to an official moderator post, they can do so by pm or in forum issues or one of its subsections. Private messages (PMs) are not subject to this rule.[/spoiler]
[spoiler]Quote:
when you show details about ....

1 etl upgrade in ascend 3 years ago
2 rambo multie in ascend
3 the big amount farm run now

don.t forget we reported a scripter and it was banned after 2 years

mister stuff of legends to much **Filtered** run with admin help (in ascend)

don.t come here and talk about random id ;)

on the end we don.t need multies get banned
dde black list is enought for them

have admin power is not all you will end to play this game with your friends;)

****

This is a warning regarding the following post made by you: viewtopic.php?f=62&p=2595215#p2595215 .

b. Replies
Replies will be considered spam if they do not contribute to the discussion of the topic, or derail the topic from the intended purpose as defined in the opening post. This may include multiple replies that contain nothing more than emoticons or small words such as ‘lol’. While it is appropriate to indicate something is amusing, drowning out a whole thread with such posts makes it hard to follow for all users. Replying to an official moderator post in topic will be considered spam. Should a user wish to reply to an official moderator post, they can do so by pm or in forum issues or one of its subsections. Private messages (PMs) are not subject to this rule.[/spoiler]

rob will sit on you in game :smt043

Re: caprila

Posted: Sun Jun 01, 2014 3:15 am
by The Doctor
Are you arguing whether the warnings are valid, or are you arguing that Caprila was the one to give the warnings?

Re: caprila

Posted: Sun Jun 01, 2014 3:32 am
by R0B3RT
Haz wrote:Are you arguing whether the warnings are valid, or are you arguing that Caprila was the one to give the warnings?
i asked who upgrade etl account 3 years ago and got warned ....is regulary that ;)

they closed a multie topic i said there are 5 suspect account capra warned me again

is all regular ;)
to much player from dde get warn from this taf mod in short time :smt019
caprila will end like you haz :smt043 a farm :smt112

Re: caprila

Posted: Sun Jun 01, 2014 4:46 am
by D3ath
well i am pretty sure caprila shouldnt have done what she/he did.
before i was kinda thinking she was tl so didnt really bothered me that much, but as she is clearly biased as she is part of the war, she shouldnt mod topics she is involved, i am sure there was such rule for mods in the past as to avoid such accusations. And if she/he as a mod thinks someone has to be done he/she should ask a mod who isnt participating in clashes to do the job, thats how it was in the past. At least thats what i remember from the times when odie was mod so unless something was changed and mods are now allowed to be biased i think caprila did wrong things, and i would really like to see her apology or that she would be stripped of her mod powers :)

Re: caprila

Posted: Sun Jun 01, 2014 4:59 am
by Caprila
It appears your accusation is that, as I'm a member of Taf, I should not be allowed to warn you, anywhere in the forum, as you are part of DDE, and we're 'at war'?


1. The practice of not modding topics that feature your alliance, or those you are at war with, is usually limited to the GC. Neither of your warnings were in GC, they both originated in 'For Admin'

2. By definition 'your' alliance, and/or 'your war', are spoken in the present tense. SGW is a great game, but it's one I've been gone from, in all capacities, for a couple of months now. Former alliances, former wars.. former 'games', don't usually hold weight in accusations of moderator bias.

3. I realize you have a personal dislike for me. It's been quite obvious, from your replies to me on the forums this past year. I don't know what started it, but your personal feelings towards me... do not prohibit me from warning you when you break the rules.


As I say, in most of the cases when people post in the Ombudsman Corner about one of my warnings.. The Ombudsman Corner is supposed to be a resolution point between mods and users, when all other communications have failed. And yet, time and time again, users start with the Ombudsman Corner. If you disagreed with a board warning, or a moderation action, you are free to speak to the mod, or their section head involved. Chances are, you have a much greater chance of serious resolution using that method.

Your recent pm to me, seems to indicate that this, like many other posts regarding me :
Message subject: Re: Board warning issued
From: R0B3RT
Sent: May 28th, '14, 21:57
To: Caprila
Message
suck it :smt047
is not serious either.

Re: caprila

Posted: Sun Jun 01, 2014 5:52 am
by R0B3RT
Caprila wrote:It appears your accusation is that, as I'm a member of Taf, I should not be allowed to warn you, anywhere in the forum, as you are part of DDE, and we're 'at war'?


1. The practice of not modding topics that feature your alliance, or those you are at war with, is usually limited to the GC. Neither of your warnings were in GC, they both originated in 'For Admin'

2. By definition 'your' alliance, and/or 'your war', are spoken in the present tense. SGW is a great game, but it's one I've been gone from, in all capacities, for a couple of months now. Former alliances, former wars.. former 'games', don't usually hold weight in accusations of moderator bias.

3. I realize you have a personal dislike for me. It's been quite obvious, from your replies to me on the forums this past year. I don't know what started it, but your personal feelings towards me... do not prohibit me from warning you when you break the rules.


As I say, in most of the cases when people post in the Ombudsman Corner about one of my warnings.. The Ombudsman Corner is supposed to be a resolution point between mods and users, when all other communications have failed. And yet, time and time again, users start with the Ombudsman Corner. If you disagreed with a board warning, or a moderation action, you are free to speak to the mod, or their section head involved. Chances are, you have a much greater chance of serious resolution using that method.

Your recent pm to me, seems to indicate that this, like many other posts regarding me :
Message subject: Re: Board warning issued
From: R0B3RT
Sent: May 28th, '14, 21:57
To: Caprila
Message
suck it :smt047
is not serious either.
play the game and if you have problem with dde mass them there not abuse on forum
and about my pm is a love message ;) i know you like me :smt056you run from dde in tl
when we start a war you shoot vac
now we are in war with taf and you........in vac
who give you moderator power need look at this and problem not start on this infected forum;)
we have enought with haz :smt025 and sol admin in ascend :smt110

GIVE RESPECT TO BE RESPECTED

Re: caprila

Posted: Sun Jun 01, 2014 6:34 am
by ~wilco~
R0B3RT wrote:after i get 2 warn in this mode

[spoiler]The following is a warning which has been issued to you by an administrator or moderator of this site.
Quote:
5 account not 2
i don.t give more details because caprila need play this game before ask details :-D

and surprize ... is omegan :smt043

***

i share with a bull my proof?
a punch in your hippo face all you can have :-"

***

This is a warning regarding the following post made by you: viewtopic.php?f=209&p=2596073#p2596073 .

Section 4: Spam
a. Topics.
Topics will be considered spam if they fit into one of three categories.
i) They appear in the wrong section of the board.
ii) The poster has made more topics than is reasonable for one user within the day. A moderator will judge this based upon the topics created and where they are created at.
iii) The topic has already been locked by a moderator and the user has reposted the topic.

b. Replies
Replies will be considered spam if they do not contribute to the discussion of the topic, or derail the topic from the intended purpose as defined in the opening post. This may include multiple replies that contain nothing more than emoticons or small words such as ‘lol’. While it is appropriate to indicate something is amusing, drowning out a whole thread with such posts makes it hard to follow for all users. Replying to an official moderator post in topic will be considered spam. Should a user wish to reply to an official moderator post, they can do so by pm or in forum issues or one of its subsections. Private messages (PMs) are not subject to this rule.[/spoiler]
[spoiler]Quote:
when you show details about ....

1 etl upgrade in ascend 3 years ago
2 rambo multie in ascend
3 the big amount farm run now

don.t forget we reported a scripter and it was banned after 2 years

mister stuff of legends to much **Filtered** run with admin help (in ascend)

don.t come here and talk about random id ;)

on the end we don.t need multies get banned
dde black list is enought for them

have admin power is not all you will end to play this game with your friends;)

****

This is a warning regarding the following post made by you: viewtopic.php?f=62&p=2595215#p2595215 .

b. Replies
Replies will be considered spam if they do not contribute to the discussion of the topic, or derail the topic from the intended purpose as defined in the opening post. This may include multiple replies that contain nothing more than emoticons or small words such as ‘lol’. While it is appropriate to indicate something is amusing, drowning out a whole thread with such posts makes it hard to follow for all users. Replying to an official moderator post in topic will be considered spam. Should a user wish to reply to an official moderator post, they can do so by pm or in forum issues or one of its subsections. Private messages (PMs) are not subject to this rule.[/spoiler]

rob will sit on you in game :smt043
You will be in war with TAF for a while then rob if u insist on following this through afterall Caprilla is taf wether you like it or not.

Re: caprila

Posted: Sun Jun 01, 2014 6:57 am
by R0B3RT
~Wilco~ wrote:
R0B3RT wrote:after i get 2 warn in this mode

[spoiler]The following is a warning which has been issued to you by an administrator or moderator of this site.
Quote:
5 account not 2
i don.t give more details because caprila need play this game before ask details :-D

and surprize ... is omegan :smt043

***

i share with a bull my proof?
a punch in your hippo face all you can have :-"

***

This is a warning regarding the following post made by you: viewtopic.php?f=209&p=2596073#p2596073 .

Section 4: Spam
a. Topics.
Topics will be considered spam if they fit into one of three categories.
i) They appear in the wrong section of the board.
ii) The poster has made more topics than is reasonable for one user within the day. A moderator will judge this based upon the topics created and where they are created at.
iii) The topic has already been locked by a moderator and the user has reposted the topic.

b. Replies
Replies will be considered spam if they do not contribute to the discussion of the topic, or derail the topic from the intended purpose as defined in the opening post. This may include multiple replies that contain nothing more than emoticons or small words such as ‘lol’. While it is appropriate to indicate something is amusing, drowning out a whole thread with such posts makes it hard to follow for all users. Replying to an official moderator post in topic will be considered spam. Should a user wish to reply to an official moderator post, they can do so by pm or in forum issues or one of its subsections. Private messages (PMs) are not subject to this rule.[/spoiler]
[spoiler]Quote:
when you show details about ....

1 etl upgrade in ascend 3 years ago
2 rambo multie in ascend
3 the big amount farm run now

don.t forget we reported a scripter and it was banned after 2 years

mister stuff of legends to much **Filtered** run with admin help (in ascend)

don.t come here and talk about random id ;)

on the end we don.t need multies get banned
dde black list is enought for them

have admin power is not all you will end to play this game with your friends;)

****

This is a warning regarding the following post made by you: viewtopic.php?f=62&p=2595215#p2595215 .

b. Replies
Replies will be considered spam if they do not contribute to the discussion of the topic, or derail the topic from the intended purpose as defined in the opening post. This may include multiple replies that contain nothing more than emoticons or small words such as ‘lol’. While it is appropriate to indicate something is amusing, drowning out a whole thread with such posts makes it hard to follow for all users. Replying to an official moderator post in topic will be considered spam. Should a user wish to reply to an official moderator post, they can do so by pm or in forum issues or one of its subsections. Private messages (PMs) are not subject to this rule.[/spoiler]

rob will sit on you in game :smt043
You will be in war with TAF for a while then rob if u insist on following this through afterall Caprilla is taf wether you like it or not.
you know me i will do :smt042
just update my personal log with a new coward id today

Re: caprila

Posted: Sun Jun 01, 2014 9:47 am
by Field Marshall
It has been policy that in order to show that there is no bias of mods currently at war with those that they are warning that it would be left to someone else.

What changed?

I believe this is a rational request as even though a mod should not a cast aspersions on the accused, their judgement may be clouded.

Is it not acceptable to ask somebody else to penalise as necessary?

After all, this is what the ombudsman was set up for.

Re: caprila

Posted: Sun Jun 01, 2014 11:35 am
by Setesh
She fights wars with warnings

Re: caprila

Posted: Sun Jun 01, 2014 5:30 pm
by Jack
Field Marshall wrote:It has been policy that in order to show that there is no bias of mods currently at war with those that they are warning that it would be left to someone else.

What changed?

I believe this is a rational request as even though a mod should not a cast aspersions on the accused, their judgement may be clouded.

Is it not acceptable to ask somebody else to penalise as necessary?

After all, this is what the ombudsman was set up for.
If you really really want that, I guess we could make it policy that I start handing out all the warnings for GC. But you really, really don't want that. I am predisposed to handing out multiple warnings at a time, like candy. Then people get banned, and my banhammer is all rusty and tends to malfunction causing people to be banned for longer than intended. :smt105