Page 5 of 5

Re: Arkenius vs Semantics

Posted: Tue Feb 23, 2016 10:09 am
by Arkenius
On the other hand, Semantics is trying to put up a fight. But that's not enough. You got trashed again. 8-[

KILLS
Grand Total of Planets Slaughtered 2,092,936,084
Command Star Attack Weapons Destroyed 13,898,152
Command Star Defence Weapons Destroyed 25,437,274

LOSES
[spoiler]Grand Total of Planets Slaughtered 334,207,726
Command Star Attack Weapons Destroyed 8,825,212
Command Star Defence Weapons Destroyed 12,971,111[/spoiler]

Re: Arkenius vs Semantics & Wyatt Earp

Posted: Tue Feb 23, 2016 11:06 am
by harchester
Arkenius wrote:
Wyatt Earp wrote:mother likes this loser...
Yea, she does! Say hi to her from me. Ask her if I am still scheduled for tonight as well. :smt050

I know she has quite the traffic in there this time of year.

harchester wrote:Why not join an alliance - army x that way people can mass ark for making you :P
As if that will ever stop me. :-$

Besides, Wyatt Earp is already out of this. He removed ascend and went to vac in main. He failed and lost. :)) I'll add him again if and when he ever gets another account. Not that it will make any difference for him.
Not meant to stop you - just to inconvenience your alliance growth :P

Re: Arkenius vs Semantics & Wyatt Earp

Posted: Tue Feb 23, 2016 12:37 pm
by Arkenius
harchester wrote: Not meant to stop you - just to inconvenience alliance growth :P
awww... I know I am awesome but I never thought of myself as the equivalent of a whole alliance, on my own. gee... thanks, pumpkin! you do know how to make me feel special :smt050

Re: Arkenius vs Semantics

Posted: Wed Feb 24, 2016 1:30 am
by Wyatt Earp
Doesn't take much to make a RAT feel special... :smt047
Son let me step up to the plate :smt078 on you
RL matters more if you had one.. :smt115

Re: Arkenius vs Semantics

Posted: Wed Feb 24, 2016 1:42 am
by Arkenius
Wyatt Earp wrote:Doesn't take much to make a RAT feel special... :smt047
Son let me step up to the plate :smt078 on you
RL matters more if you had one.. :smt115
You spoke like a true looser. =D> You poor thing. :smt117
Go plow the fields, kid. Don't worry, it's no shame... someone has to do it.

See ya around, peasant. :smt081

Re: Arkenius vs Semantics

Posted: Wed Feb 24, 2016 4:31 am
by JOS
Wyatt Earp wrote:Doesn't take much to make a RAT feel special... :smt047
Son let me step up to the plate :smt078 on you
RL matters more if you had one.. :smt115
The irony of a caught multi claiming that RL matters more after getting consistently getting massed into the ground... :-$

Re: Arkenius vs Semantics

Posted: Sat Feb 27, 2016 2:50 am
by Wyatt Earp
Ark's a bite slow you know; a want to be honey badger with no clue to build a defense... [-X

Show the RAT a little :smt060 :smt060 :smt060

Long wars are meaningless... When I return MULTI heaven will rain upon you

Re: Arkenius vs Semantics

Posted: Sat Feb 27, 2016 7:01 am
by Arkenius
You remain a looser, though :smt115

Re: Arkenius vs Semantics

Posted: Sat Feb 27, 2016 8:57 am
by Arkenius
Semantics got trashed again.

I have no idea what you are doing, noob... but keep it up.

WINS
Command Star Attack Weapons Destroyed 19,047,788
Command Star Defence Weapons Destroyed 42,472,912
LOSES
[spoiler]Command Star Attack Weapons Destroyed 8,878,552
Command Star Defence Weapons Destroyed 19,572,960[/spoiler]

Thanx for the nice total numbers:
Command Star Attack Weapons Destroyed 503,452,169 (Ranked: 15)
Command Star Defence Weapons Destroyed 520,024,169 (Ranked: 20)