Page 5 of 5
Re: Arkenius vs Semantics
Posted: Tue Feb 23, 2016 10:09 am
by Arkenius
On the other hand, Semantics is trying to put up a fight. But that's not enough. You got trashed again.
KILLS
Grand Total of Planets Slaughtered 2,092,936,084
Command Star Attack Weapons Destroyed 13,898,152
Command Star Defence Weapons Destroyed 25,437,274
LOSES
[spoiler]Grand Total of Planets Slaughtered 334,207,726
Command Star Attack Weapons Destroyed 8,825,212
Command Star Defence Weapons Destroyed 12,971,111[/spoiler]
Re: Arkenius vs Semantics & Wyatt Earp
Posted: Tue Feb 23, 2016 11:06 am
by harchester
Arkenius wrote:Wyatt Earp wrote:mother likes this loser...
Yea, she does! Say hi to her from me. Ask her if I am still scheduled for tonight as well.
I know
she has quite the traffic in
there this time of year.
harchester wrote:Why not join an alliance - army x that way people can mass ark for making you
As if that will ever stop me.
Besides, Wyatt Earp is already out of this. He removed ascend and went to vac in main. He failed and lost.
) I'll add him again if and when he ever gets another account. Not that it will make any difference for him.
Not meant to stop you - just to inconvenience your alliance growth
Re: Arkenius vs Semantics & Wyatt Earp
Posted: Tue Feb 23, 2016 12:37 pm
by Arkenius
harchester wrote:
Not meant to stop you - just to inconvenience alliance growth
awww... I know I am awesome but I never thought of myself as the equivalent of a whole alliance, on my own. gee... thanks, pumpkin! you do know how to make me feel special
Re: Arkenius vs Semantics
Posted: Wed Feb 24, 2016 1:30 am
by Wyatt Earp
Doesn't take much to make a RAT feel special...
Son let me step up to the plate
on you
RL matters more if you had one..
Re: Arkenius vs Semantics
Posted: Wed Feb 24, 2016 1:42 am
by Arkenius
Wyatt Earp wrote:Doesn't take much to make a RAT feel special...
Son let me step up to the plate
on you
RL matters more if you had one..
You spoke like a true looser.
You poor thing.
Go plow the fields, kid. Don't worry, it's no shame... someone has to do it.
See ya around, peasant.
Re: Arkenius vs Semantics
Posted: Wed Feb 24, 2016 4:31 am
by JOS
Wyatt Earp wrote:Doesn't take much to make a RAT feel special...
Son let me step up to the plate
on you
RL matters more if you had one..
The irony of a caught multi claiming that RL matters more after getting consistently getting massed into the ground...
Re: Arkenius vs Semantics
Posted: Sat Feb 27, 2016 2:50 am
by Wyatt Earp
Ark's a bite slow you know; a want to be honey badger with no clue to build a defense...
Show the RAT a little
Long wars are meaningless... When I return MULTI heaven will rain upon you
Re: Arkenius vs Semantics
Posted: Sat Feb 27, 2016 7:01 am
by Arkenius
You remain a looser, though
Re: Arkenius vs Semantics
Posted: Sat Feb 27, 2016 8:57 am
by Arkenius
Semantics got trashed again.
I have no idea what you are doing, noob... but keep it up.
WINS
Command Star Attack Weapons Destroyed 19,047,788
Command Star Defence Weapons Destroyed 42,472,912
LOSES
[spoiler]Command Star Attack Weapons Destroyed 8,878,552
Command Star Defence Weapons Destroyed 19,572,960[/spoiler]
Thanx for the nice total numbers:
Command Star Attack Weapons Destroyed 503,452,169 (Ranked: 15)
Command Star Defence Weapons Destroyed 520,024,169 (Ranked: 20)