StarGateWars Forums

whhaaaaaat no good farming for two months oh well i had hopes

Thanks Support!

Just a another piece to add, given the example with 500B income.
I may be wrong here, but if planets don't count towards bank size, it would take 5bil miners to achieve that income.

Now given we have 500mil lifers. Each MT would only increase the bank by 480 bil.
1000% in a year would increase my bank by 48T?

I just don't think this is worth it and will no farm because i can't upgrade my coverts and can't wait long enough to be able to build my bank up that slow.

That's my understanding anyways. Please correct me if i am wrong, because i hope i am haha.

Unsure if ascended bonus, etc counts, which would obviously have an impact if counted.

Noted, thank you Heisenberg.



Will reply to your concerns later this week - essay time-drain.

New Bank Sizes Make me Nervous for account growth

Colonel Jack Oneill wrote:New Bank Sizes Make me Nervous for account growth

i would agree

red1 minshu wrote:

Colonel Jack Oneill wrote:New Bank Sizes Make me Nervous for account growth

i would agree

Not even out yet!!

Well there be a bank minimum like there is now? (500t)

feel the need to weigh in - my main has had a bank over 4q for a while now on covert level 38
the old banking system has never actually left... just gets superseded by the covert level cap if your actual bank is smaller than next covert level.


also - as Clock said, adapt.
this will make UP useful again, holding a bigger army for more miners for bigger bank.
suddenly UP planets come to play more, planet stripping in wars come to play more to lower banks....

Dont like it. Totaly unessesary update - it is forcing players to get bigger and invest in UP, which is against the playstile i play. Bigger players are again three steps ahead. So you cant advance if you are small and so account growth is stopped.

Any update about the date of implementation?

Looking at this now yes it would make things alot more difficult... BUT it also would bring alot more dimension to the game and alot more risk. Witch would be fun but I feel this would be going in the wrong direction on the "trying to make the over powered accounts not so powerfull" argument for the simple fact of they buy their naq with $$ so that will have their naq anyway and same with uu. And this will only hurt the ones who have to farm to build their account. Making the one who spends $$ more unstoppable and untouchable.

Phobetor wrote:Looking at this now yes it would make things alot more difficult... BUT it also would bring alot more dimension to the game and alot more risk. Witch would be fun but I feel this would be going in the wrong direction on the "trying to make the over powered accounts not so powerfull" argument for the simple fact of they buy their naq with $$ so that will have their naq anyway and same with uu. And this will only hurt the ones who have to farm to build their account. Making the one who spends $$ more unstoppable and untouchable.

Totally agree. Update made for wallet warriors.