Sarparto VS Angel of Valor

[Hobgoblin]

Sorry I too am new tot he game, is there difference to Naq that has no def and a planet which has no def.

why can one be taken and not the other?

[Imperius]

Sorry I too am new tot he game, is there difference to Naq that has no def and a planet which has no def.

why can one be taken and not the other?

Exactly mate.

If a prior with 16m Army size can take one of your planets, you probably deserved it.

sarparto, broker him or deal with me.

Im off.

Good nyt.

[sarparto]

Many, if not all major alliances, consider taking a planet as an act of war. Taking naq does much less damage to an account, than stealing a planet, hence the different responses. Although some alliances will still mass over farming.

[Mathlord]

Lay a finger on Sarparto and you're mine too Imperius

[Ashu]

Lay a finger on Sarparto and you're mine too Imperius

[~Tziki~]

There are consequences to actions.

And your alliance member will learn the hard way also.

it seems TAF are becoming that which they insist they hate. Throwing around their new found taste of power.

Live by the sword, die by the sword.

Sarparto expected this saying from one, but cant live up to it himself. why is he suddenly above it were as Imperius's officer is not?

simple answer.. because TAF think so. well sorry betty but taf dont make the rules of morality. and morality says sarparto is in the wrong.

[Imperius]

Lol ^^^ x 3

[Rudy Peña]

GO Angel of Valor, beat up this bully.

[Imperius]

How about 1v1 with all TA members who have an issue with this vendy?

Week 1 - Sap
Week 2 - Betty
Week 3 - Math
Week 4 - Mittenz

I'm happy for one week each? Same rules for each.

[Coulson]

There are consequences to actions.

When the Stark cub left the Riverlands undefended the consequences were that we're able to raid and pillage them until he's brought his army there.

Anecdotal story. There's consequences to leaving planet undefended and visible: It'll gets taken.
There's consequences to taking any planet: You'll get bit. You're right. Good post.

[xDaku]

There are consequences to actions.

it seems TAF are becoming that which they insist they hate. Throwing around their new found taste of power.

There are few, if any, alliances ingame that would go through the trouble of PMing a member about betterment of an account, lol.

And show me the post where TAF "insist on hating" something.

Empty vessels make the loudest noise. Empty sentences make the loudest laughs.

Anyway, have fun with the vendetta....whoever gets involved. I'd love a good onliner spectacle if Math's in this.

[dgb]

The post above wins the prize,sarparto went above and beyond what any 1 else would to not start with this lad,obviously he new he had a big account behind him and took the ile do what i like attitude,when i first started i got hammerd many times with no help from any 1 but it learnt me the game fast
And to Tziki taf dont bully any 1 we hate it, thats why certain people are asked to leave when they do.

[Mathlord]

How about 1v1 with all TA members who have an issue with this vendy?

Week 1 - Sap
Week 2 - Betty
Week 3 - Math
Week 4 - Mittenz

I'm happy for one week each? Same rules for each.

Not a chance. Mess with one of my members and I will see you that day. We all will.

[Field Marshall]

There are consequences to actions.

And your alliance member will learn the hard way also.

it seems TAF are becoming that which they insist they hate. Throwing around their new found taste of power.

Live by the sword, die by the sword.

Sarparto expected this saying from one, but cant live up to it himself. why is he suddenly above it were as Imperius's officer is not?

simple answer.. because TAF think so. well sorry betty but taf dont make the rules of morality. and morality says sarparto is in the wrong.

Bla bla bla...something something something, i'm going to mass rank 666 for the lulz BS.

[Drahazar]

if its a fair hit its a fair hit, accept it and move on.