You can't just have a how much can the other kill because the bigger alliances would always win, because they will kill a higher % of the other due to a massively bigger total alliance wide army size.
If you did it so that it was on Kill to Death Ratio it would be fairer, as it shows skill not just on a personal level but an alliance level as well.
If you had 2 alliance in bloodwar, one with 1.5Billion AS and one with 500mill AS the bigger can squash the other, the smaller alliance will NOT be able to kill a higher % of the enemy than the bigger.
However if the smaller kills 600million for a loss of 400 million they have a KDR of 1.5
If the Bigger alliance killed 400million for a loss of 350million they would be the one with a positive ratio they would win, this seems the fairer system imo.
And once again Guild im with you on that, should be no market usage in bloodwar, exept mercs.
Admin get of your arse !
- Drahazar
- Forum Elite
- Posts: 1626
- Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2010 6:04 pm
- Alliance: Judgement
- Race: Divine
- ID: 1957053
- Alternate name(s): Drahazar - Eternal FS Leader
Drahazar - Leader of "The Original Collective" - Location: Creepin', Peepin', Waitin'...
- Contact:
Re: Admin get of your arse !
Spoiler
-
- Forum Addict
- Posts: 4826
- Joined: Wed Dec 03, 2008 11:18 am
- Alliance: Retiring
- Race: Draeden
- ID: 1916018
- Location: writing a booklet so people understand my humour :D
Re: Admin get of your arse !
my main worry is that, if you went for a kill death ratio, is that people would then just target the weakest accounts, as they will have worse cov lvls etc and less AB bonus
Retired but still on a rampage
Spoiler
Rudy Peña wrote:Yea, OE is the the next FS in terms of snipers. We proud ourselves on it to the point we give out awards and see who can mass the most with a 0 def.
Drahazar wrote:Im happy to snipe anyone i want, why should i build any defences for you people
George Hazard wrote:FM is like a rite of passage for alliances.
You haven't truly made it to manhood until you've slept with the town prostitute.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- ~Odin~
- Alföðr
- Posts: 6478
- Joined: Tue Apr 24, 2007 8:23 pm
- Alliance: The Collective
- Race: International Pimp
- ID: 0
Re: Admin get of your arse !
Guild wrote:because if you can get one person on to phase and double strike and the rest of their alliance has relatively nothing built , it is impossible for the bigger alliance with stats built to win, even if you take them down 130% killed~Odin~ #30 wrote:Can I ask why you feel it should be changed to a %?Guild wrote:and do something about this broken waste of time farce, that is bloodrealm
change the winning to a %
or an alliance lets say FP, can sit statless with just one person on ppt lets say FM, with stats built and then just has to PHASE and Double strike in bloodrealm !>?!>??!?! and run through an alliance, making it impossible to do anything as there is nothing to kill
I mean seriously!
in summary:
-get rid of that god damm tick box !
-change winning to be a %
-remove phase and double strike
Both FM and I had stats (I had 10mil supers and 10mil spies) although I just so happen to be on 30mins before our alliance PPT ened. However I was out all day and If i knew we were going to bloodwar i would have built a way bigger strike to try and take down KOS which meant you guys always would have had the chance to destroy that.
As far as double strike and phasing i can see your point on that 100% as i used double strike and phasing and it helped me alot to take down what i did with what little units i had. I can see both sides of this argument however I'm 50/50 on what should be done with it, considering the bloodwar only goes for 24 hours maybe get rid of phasing however keep double strike for those that jump on and missed the 4 hour prep time.
(not taking stabs at people here im legit trying to help and see what we can do about this).
if you removed the phase and double strike, then i spose, it could be better for fixed amount but i dont see why it wouldn't be a %
What exactly do you think the % would be based on?
kills done on team A from start to finish of the war compared to team B?
I personally think phasing can go I have no issue with that, Hell I'm okay with phasing stopping completely while in bloodwar (so if someone phases before blood war then bloodwar hits they are no longer in phase) However I dont think FM was phased during this bloodwar unless he used the 30min MT phase which i did as well.
The forces of harchester fought back with all they could, and managed to inflict 145,573,411,725,000 damage
The forces of harchester fought back with all they could, and managed to inflict 3 damage
The forces of harchester fought back with all they could, and managed to inflict 3 damage
TGW Annual Community Awards 2014/2015
Spoiler
- Drahazar
- Forum Elite
- Posts: 1626
- Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2010 6:04 pm
- Alliance: Judgement
- Race: Divine
- ID: 1957053
- Alternate name(s): Drahazar - Eternal FS Leader
Drahazar - Leader of "The Original Collective" - Location: Creepin', Peepin', Waitin'...
- Contact:
Re: Admin get of your arse !
Either way, pretty much everything gets destroyed anyway? Its my experience that it all get destroyed pretty quickly.Guild wrote:my main worry is that, if you went for a kill death ratio, is that people would then just target the weakest accounts, as they will have worse cov lvls etc and less AB bonus
Spoiler
- jedi~tank
- Forum Zombie
- Posts: 9936
- Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 12:43 pm
- ID: 0
- Location: Creepin in the back door
Re: Admin get of your arse !
~Odin~ #30 wrote:Guild wrote:because if you can get one person on to phase and double strike and the rest of their alliance has relatively nothing built , it is impossible for the bigger alliance with stats built to win, even if you take them down 130% killed~Odin~ #30 wrote:Can I ask why you feel it should be changed to a %?Guild wrote:and do something about this broken waste of time farce, that is bloodrealm
change the winning to a %
or an alliance lets say FP, can sit statless with just one person on ppt lets say FM, with stats built and then just has to PHASE and Double strike in bloodrealm !>?!>??!?! and run through an alliance, making it impossible to do anything as there is nothing to kill
I mean seriously!
in summary:
-get rid of that god damm tick box !
-change winning to be a %
-remove phase and double strike
Both FM and I had stats (I had 10mil supers and 10mil spies) although I just so happen to be on 30mins before our alliance PPT ened. However I was out all day and If i knew we were going to bloodwar i would have built a way bigger strike to try and take down KOS which meant you guys always would have had the chance to destroy that.
As far as double strike and phasing i can see your point on that 100% as i used double strike and phasing and it helped me alot to take down what i did with what little units i had. I can see both sides of this argument however I'm 50/50 on what should be done with it, considering the bloodwar only goes for 24 hours maybe get rid of phasing however keep double strike for those that jump on and missed the 4 hour prep time.
(not taking stabs at people here im legit trying to help and see what we can do about this).
if you removed the phase and double strike, then i spose, it could be better for fixed amount but i dont see why it wouldn't be a %
What exactly do you think the % would be based on?
kills done on team A from start to finish of the war compared to team B?
I personally think phasing can go I have no issue with that, Hell I'm okay with phasing stopping completely while in bloodwar (so if someone phases before blood war then bloodwar hits they are no longer in phase) However I dont think FM was phased during this bloodwar unless he used the 30min MT phase which i did as well.
Based on losses from a starting army size with everything killable in the blood realm. Deduct what you have killed from what you have lost collectively and tally a final score based on %.
Thus if a larger group is better organized than a smaller group then they will most likely win, same..if a smaller group is better organized than a larger, they will win...
"What I want to see is a tight knit group not a collection of people pulling in different directions"
Deni
- ~Odin~
- Alföðr
- Posts: 6478
- Joined: Tue Apr 24, 2007 8:23 pm
- Alliance: The Collective
- Race: International Pimp
- ID: 0
Re: Admin get of your arse !
[spoiler]
I think we can all agree that if it was to be changed it needs to be a middle ground so that it does not benefit big alliances to much nor does it effect smaller alliances to much. As stated im cool with phasing being eliminated completely while in blood war. As annoying as it is i think the tick box should remain for the benefit of smaller alliances as well as mid ranged alliances, this way they get a chance to think twice before going into bloodwar.
[/spoiler]Jedi~Tank wrote:~Odin~ #30 wrote:Guild wrote:because if you can get one person on to phase and double strike and the rest of their alliance has relatively nothing built , it is impossible for the bigger alliance with stats built to win, even if you take them down 130% killed~Odin~ #30 wrote:Can I ask why you feel it should be changed to a %?Guild wrote:and do something about this broken waste of time farce, that is bloodrealm
change the winning to a %
or an alliance lets say FP, can sit statless with just one person on ppt lets say FM, with stats built and then just has to PHASE and Double strike in bloodrealm !>?!>??!?! and run through an alliance, making it impossible to do anything as there is nothing to kill
I mean seriously!
in summary:
-get rid of that god damm tick box !
-change winning to be a %
-remove phase and double strike
Both FM and I had stats (I had 10mil supers and 10mil spies) although I just so happen to be on 30mins before our alliance PPT ened. However I was out all day and If i knew we were going to bloodwar i would have built a way bigger strike to try and take down KOS which meant you guys always would have had the chance to destroy that.
As far as double strike and phasing i can see your point on that 100% as i used double strike and phasing and it helped me alot to take down what i did with what little units i had. I can see both sides of this argument however I'm 50/50 on what should be done with it, considering the bloodwar only goes for 24 hours maybe get rid of phasing however keep double strike for those that jump on and missed the 4 hour prep time.
(not taking stabs at people here im legit trying to help and see what we can do about this).
if you removed the phase and double strike, then i spose, it could be better for fixed amount but i dont see why it wouldn't be a %
What exactly do you think the % would be based on?
kills done on team A from start to finish of the war compared to team B?
I personally think phasing can go I have no issue with that, Hell I'm okay with phasing stopping completely while in bloodwar (so if someone phases before blood war then bloodwar hits they are no longer in phase) However I dont think FM was phased during this bloodwar unless he used the 30min MT phase which i did as well.
Based on losses from a starting army size.
I think we can all agree that if it was to be changed it needs to be a middle ground so that it does not benefit big alliances to much nor does it effect smaller alliances to much. As stated im cool with phasing being eliminated completely while in blood war. As annoying as it is i think the tick box should remain for the benefit of smaller alliances as well as mid ranged alliances, this way they get a chance to think twice before going into bloodwar.
The forces of harchester fought back with all they could, and managed to inflict 145,573,411,725,000 damage
The forces of harchester fought back with all they could, and managed to inflict 3 damage
The forces of harchester fought back with all they could, and managed to inflict 3 damage
TGW Annual Community Awards 2014/2015
Spoiler
- jedi~tank
- Forum Zombie
- Posts: 9936
- Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 12:43 pm
- ID: 0
- Location: Creepin in the back door
Re: Admin get of your arse !
The only way you can reach a fair middle ground is by % and or limit the number of players per alliance in the realm. You want to maintain a balance of bigger vs smaller and thats penalizing a bigger and favoring a smaller. If you want to FAIRLY compete you either have to get bigger or stay within what you can actually compete with.~Odin~ #30 wrote:[spoiler][/spoiler]Jedi~Tank wrote:~Odin~ #30 wrote:Guild wrote:because if you can get one person on to phase and double strike and the rest of their alliance has relatively nothing built , it is impossible for the bigger alliance with stats built to win, even if you take them down 130% killed~Odin~ #30 wrote:Can I ask why you feel it should be changed to a %?Guild wrote:and do something about this broken waste of time farce, that is bloodrealm
change the winning to a %
or an alliance lets say FP, can sit statless with just one person on ppt lets say FM, with stats built and then just has to PHASE and Double strike in bloodrealm !>?!>??!?! and run through an alliance, making it impossible to do anything as there is nothing to kill
I mean seriously!
in summary:
-get rid of that god damm tick box !
-change winning to be a %
-remove phase and double strike
Both FM and I had stats (I had 10mil supers and 10mil spies) although I just so happen to be on 30mins before our alliance PPT ened. However I was out all day and If i knew we were going to bloodwar i would have built a way bigger strike to try and take down KOS which meant you guys always would have had the chance to destroy that.
As far as double strike and phasing i can see your point on that 100% as i used double strike and phasing and it helped me alot to take down what i did with what little units i had. I can see both sides of this argument however I'm 50/50 on what should be done with it, considering the bloodwar only goes for 24 hours maybe get rid of phasing however keep double strike for those that jump on and missed the 4 hour prep time.
(not taking stabs at people here im legit trying to help and see what we can do about this).
if you removed the phase and double strike, then i spose, it could be better for fixed amount but i dont see why it wouldn't be a %
What exactly do you think the % would be based on?
kills done on team A from start to finish of the war compared to team B?
I personally think phasing can go I have no issue with that, Hell I'm okay with phasing stopping completely while in bloodwar (so if someone phases before blood war then bloodwar hits they are no longer in phase) However I dont think FM was phased during this bloodwar unless he used the 30min MT phase which i did as well.
Based on losses from a starting army size.
I think we can all agree that if it was to be changed it needs to be a middle ground so that it does not benefit big alliances to much nor does it effect smaller alliances to much. As stated im cool with phasing being eliminated completely while in blood war. As annoying as it is i think the tick box should remain for the benefit of smaller alliances as well as mid ranged alliances, this way they get a chance to think twice before going into bloodwar.
As ot is the system favors the smallish sniper types wether active or not, thats not a fair scoring system because as I said if I could I would win a scoring war against every alliance in a blood war easily. Thats not fair.
"What I want to see is a tight knit group not a collection of people pulling in different directions"
Deni
- EbilCC
- Forum Addict
- Posts: 3316
- Joined: Sat Jul 04, 2009 4:19 pm
- ID: 0
Re: Admin get of your arse !
Im sorry i was involved in both blood wars before thisField Marshall wrote:Well if that was true, the meter would never have got to 100%. Why would you spend 200ATs on people with no defences? The system is there in order to ensure that adequate attacks are happening on both sides.CCexyDCapedCrusader wrote:of course you like it FM the rest of FS bar one cant afford to build big or dont
Suck it up, you all got handed it again and your throwing your toys out the pram.
Anyway, report your bug, try to get the game changed to suit yourselves. It's fine, we'll adapt. Lets not bring our war into this, don't hate the player, hate the game.
Plus how do you know other than what you've heard?
CaptainCharisma
IWANTBABBIES
[ THE DARK DOMINIUM™ - CCexy]
Disciples of Lofn (cheaters)
The UnKnown of the AJNA
{On The Cusp of A Black Hole...}
{Temporarily on the Protected Planets Treaty...}
Your on vacation, how can you even begin to complain a bug which hasn't affected you?
and I went in vac on monday because I had a health hearing case this week in front of a tribunal were i had to give evidence to doctors over days which was very stressful and things Im sorry my RL got busy for like a few days otherwise i would should you my logs of farming FS every 2 hours the past 2 weeks and geting missed PPTS etc
so lick me
- ~Odin~
- Alföðr
- Posts: 6478
- Joined: Tue Apr 24, 2007 8:23 pm
- Alliance: The Collective
- Race: International Pimp
- ID: 0
Re: Admin get of your arse !
come on people keep it civil.
The forces of harchester fought back with all they could, and managed to inflict 145,573,411,725,000 damage
The forces of harchester fought back with all they could, and managed to inflict 3 damage
The forces of harchester fought back with all they could, and managed to inflict 3 damage
TGW Annual Community Awards 2014/2015
Spoiler
- Field Marshall
- Forum Zombie
- Posts: 6108
- Joined: Tue Sep 13, 2005 10:30 pm
Re: Admin get of your arse !
You called that farming? Oh.CCexyDCapedCrusader wrote:Im sorry i was involved in both blood wars before thisField Marshall wrote:Well if that was true, the meter would never have got to 100%. Why would you spend 200ATs on people with no defences? The system is there in order to ensure that adequate attacks are happening on both sides.CCexyDCapedCrusader wrote:of course you like it FM the rest of FS bar one cant afford to build big or dont
Suck it up, you all got handed it again and your throwing your toys out the pram.
Anyway, report your bug, try to get the game changed to suit yourselves. It's fine, we'll adapt. Lets not bring our war into this, don't hate the player, hate the game.
Plus how do you know other than what you've heard?
CaptainCharisma
IWANTBABBIES
[ THE DARK DOMINIUM™ - CCexy]
Disciples of Lofn (cheaters)
The UnKnown of the AJNA
{On The Cusp of A Black Hole...}
{Temporarily on the Protected Planets Treaty...}
Your on vacation, how can you even begin to complain a bug which hasn't affected you?
and I went in vac on monday because I had a health hearing case this week in front of a tribunal were i had to give evidence to doctors over days which was very stressful and things Im sorry my RL got busy for like a few days otherwise i would should you my logs of farming FS every 2 hours the past 2 weeks and geting missed PPTS etc
so lick me
Thanks for the life story, it sounds simply terrible
They'll be no licking, but I seriously hope things improve for you soon brah.
Ohhhh no, little FP beat us hard...so now we must change the game.
Sol wrote:my first sigging. I sigged you too. <3Field Marshall wrote:Really?Sol wrote:It's not going to destroy your life
I think this is sig worthy in fact.
High Empty wrote:however people shouldn't have lvl 33 and 200mil spies and try to be in the top 10, it's unhealthy.
-
- Forum Addict
- Posts: 4826
- Joined: Wed Dec 03, 2008 11:18 am
- Alliance: Retiring
- Race: Draeden
- ID: 1916018
- Location: writing a booklet so people understand my humour :D
Re: Admin get of your arse !
FM you've been told to stop spamming and derailing topics many times before. take a walk you man child
Retired but still on a rampage
Spoiler
Rudy Peña wrote:Yea, OE is the the next FS in terms of snipers. We proud ourselves on it to the point we give out awards and see who can mass the most with a 0 def.
Drahazar wrote:Im happy to snipe anyone i want, why should i build any defences for you people
George Hazard wrote:FM is like a rite of passage for alliances.
You haven't truly made it to manhood until you've slept with the town prostitute.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- Field Marshall
- Forum Zombie
- Posts: 6108
- Joined: Tue Sep 13, 2005 10:30 pm
Re: Admin get of your arse !
Not derailing here buddy I merely replied to a spam post. Perhaps if you took some of you bias to your own players who obviously pretend they know something about something they don'tGuild wrote:FM you've been told to stop spamming and derailing topics many times before. take a walk you man child
The people who are complaining about bloodwar as a result of the one that just took place are not involved in this bloodwar.
You are completely incompetent to comment on something that you do not know about.
Basic fundamental principle of this war is you have been completely done through the use of PPTs prior to the event and our activity has topped you.
No way, in any circumstances can you claim victory on this one. Previously I pushed for a % however, having seen it 3 times with DDE, in this instance it would not have been justified.
What you haven't thought of is that half of DDE is still on PPT, the whole of FSF is not on PPT. It should be based on the numbers of UU that are OFF PPT once it begins. Then you can apply a %.
Upon entry, 40% of DDE were on PPT. Therefore, you cannot attribute those 40% deaths because they are never available.
We have killed 33% total kills of a 60% army.
You have killed 50% total kills of a 100% army.
Fundamentally, of available troops throughout the alliances. We've killed proportionality the same. Which would reflect a more honest opinion.
Sol wrote:my first sigging. I sigged you too. <3Field Marshall wrote:Really?Sol wrote:It's not going to destroy your life
I think this is sig worthy in fact.
High Empty wrote:however people shouldn't have lvl 33 and 200mil spies and try to be in the top 10, it's unhealthy.
-
- Fledgling Forumer
- Posts: 165
- Joined: Mon Dec 22, 2008 2:20 pm
- ID: 68961
- Alternate name(s): Western Warrior
- Location: Aussie
- jedi~tank
- Forum Zombie
- Posts: 9936
- Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 12:43 pm
- ID: 0
- Location: Creepin in the back door
Re: Admin get of your arse !
I fail to see where anyone is complaining, I see a topic for a legit discussion regarding aroper score system for a good gaming scenario which at this time is not proper. Take your insinuations and comlaints back on vac with you. That would be doing the community a service.Field Marshall wrote:Not derailing here buddy I merely replied to a spam post. Perhaps if you took some of you bias to your own players who obviously pretend they know something about something they don'tGuild wrote:FM you've been told to stop spamming and derailing topics many times before. take a walk you man child
The people who are complaining about bloodwar as a result of the one that just took place are not involved in this bloodwar.
You are completely incompetent to comment on something that you do not know about.
Basic fundamental principle of this war is you have been completely done through the use of PPTs prior to the event and our activity has topped you.
No way, in any circumstances can you claim victory on this one. Previously I pushed for a % however, having seen it 3 times with DDE, in this instance it would not have been justified.
What you haven't thought of is that half of DDE is still on PPT, the whole of FSF is not on PPT. It should be based on the numbers of UU that are OFF PPT once it begins. Then you can apply a %.
Upon entry, 40% of DDE were on PPT. Therefore, you cannot attribute those 40% deaths because they are never available.
We have killed 33% total kills of a 60% army.
You have killed 50% total kills of a 100% army.
Fundamentally, of available troops throughout the alliances. We've killed proportionality the same. Which would reflect a more honest opinion.
"What I want to see is a tight knit group not a collection of people pulling in different directions"
Deni
- Field Marshall
- Forum Zombie
- Posts: 6108
- Joined: Tue Sep 13, 2005 10:30 pm
Re: Admin get of your arse !
Yeah, go read the first post and tell me nobody is complaining? What's the topic called?Jedi~Tank wrote:I fail to see where anyone is complaining, I see a topic for a legit discussion regarding aroper score system for a good gaming scenario which at this time is not proper. Take your insinuations and comlaints back on vac with you. That would be doing the community a service.Field Marshall wrote:Not derailing here buddy I merely replied to a spam post. Perhaps if you took some of you bias to your own players who obviously pretend they know something about something they don'tGuild wrote:FM you've been told to stop spamming and derailing topics many times before. take a walk you man child
The people who are complaining about bloodwar as a result of the one that just took place are not involved in this bloodwar.
You are completely incompetent to comment on something that you do not know about.
Basic fundamental principle of this war is you have been completely done through the use of PPTs prior to the event and our activity has topped you.
No way, in any circumstances can you claim victory on this one. Previously I pushed for a % however, having seen it 3 times with DDE, in this instance it would not have been justified.
What you haven't thought of is that half of DDE is still on PPT, the whole of FSF is not on PPT. It should be based on the numbers of UU that are OFF PPT once it begins. Then you can apply a %.
Upon entry, 40% of DDE were on PPT. Therefore, you cannot attribute those 40% deaths because they are never available.
We have killed 33% total kills of a 60% army.
You have killed 50% total kills of a 100% army.
Fundamentally, of available troops throughout the alliances. We've killed proportionality the same. Which would reflect a more honest opinion.
Yes, the people who are suggesting things did not see the results this time. Or did you?
Don't be so rude, too many times I've seen alliances change the nature of the game, too many times have you ruined the flow of the game because of a knee jerk reaction.
You don't play JT, you don't contribute...you do nothing but complain or bully on these forums.
Sol wrote:my first sigging. I sigged you too. <3Field Marshall wrote:Really?Sol wrote:It's not going to destroy your life
I think this is sig worthy in fact.
High Empty wrote:however people shouldn't have lvl 33 and 200mil spies and try to be in the top 10, it's unhealthy.