StarGateWars Forums

Illuminati
Lizards
Freemasons

Get talking

I'd replace "Lizard" which isn't very realistic and more sci-fi related, by "Bohemian Grove" or "New World Order".
Or even more controversial, "B'nai B'rith".

Legendary Apophis wrote:I'd replace "Lizard" which isn't very realistic and more sci-fi related, by "Bohemian Grove" or "New World Order".
Or even more controversial, "B'nai B'rith".

I have a nice video you might enjoy, ill post it up tomorrow

Lol

Diack wrote:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KeWg_qSddeE

gullible. everywhere gullible.

Diack wrote:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KeWg_qSddeE

Help please! I seriously don't know if you've posted that as a joke? it is a joke right??


If you want people to take you seriously try topics that are....more down to earth lol

too much david icke

*Ritalin wrote:too much david icke

Sorry, but what Diack is talking about has got sod all to do with David Icke.

Icke repeated and attempted to perpetuate that reptilian nonsense in the past.
So yes, since he is the most high-profile reptilianist (even if he recanted his lies later - I hope?), it is very reasonable to respond to a reptilian video with "Too Icke for me."

Fanaticism is fine(-ish).. fanatically perpetuating nonsense however is a clear waste of everyone's time.

[KMA]Avenger wrote:

*Ritalin wrote:too much david icke

Sorry, but what Diack is talking about has got sod all to do with David Icke.

do some reading before posting

Juliette wrote:Icke repeated and attempted to perpetuate that reptilian nonsense in the past.
So yes, since he is the most high-profile reptilianist (even if he recanted his lies later - I hope?), it is very reasonable to respond to a reptilian video with "Too Icke for me."

Fanaticism is fine(-ish).. fanatically perpetuating nonsense however is a clear waste of everyone's time.

I think a lot of what david icke say makes sense but when he goes deep into reptile underworlds and heads of state being lizards it just spoils it

*Ritalin wrote:

[KMA]Avenger wrote:

*Ritalin wrote:too much david icke

Sorry, but what Diack is talking about has got sod all to do with David Icke.

do some reading before posting

Errm telling that to Avenger about conspiracy theories is a bit out of line. I'm sure he has read the most on the matter between books and websites than everyone else on this forum.

Juliette wrote:Icke repeated and attempted to perpetuate that reptilian nonsense in the past.
So yes, since he is the most high-profile reptilianist (even if he recanted his lies later - I hope?), it is very reasonable to respond to a reptilian video with "Too Icke for me."

Fanaticism is fine(-ish).. fanatically perpetuating nonsense however is a clear waste of everyone's time.

There's a MASSIVE difference between what that video is purported to be and what Icke talks about.

Icke is talking about the reptilians that are in many of the ancient worlds historical accounts, this is some dumb kid with a voice synthesiser pretending to be lacerta (?) the reptilian from the planet pop tart.

David has allot of info, the reptilian thing is just one small piece of that.

Disclaimer, when watching David's presentations i like to hear what he says about reptilians, but it's not my kind of thing.

*Ritalin wrote:

[KMA]Avenger wrote:

*Ritalin wrote:too much david icke

Sorry, but what Diack is talking about has got sod all to do with David Icke.

do some reading before posting

LOL! have you ever met or spoken with David Icke? i have!

I met and spoke with both David Icke and Alex Jones at last years Bilderberg meeting at the Grove Hotel in Watford.

Legendary Apophis wrote:

*Ritalin wrote:

[KMA]Avenger wrote:

*Ritalin wrote:too much david icke

Sorry, but what Diack is talking about has got sod all to do with David Icke.

do some reading before posting

Errm telling that to Avenger about conspiracy theories is a bit out of line. I'm sure he has read the most on the matter between books and websites than everyone else on this forum.

Saying that repiltes, illuminati and freemasons has got sod all to do with David Icke when thats ALL he talks about in his books is just plain ignorant... wasnt exactly a constructive reply to my opinion so i guess he was the one "out of line"

but yeh anyway