rank
-
- Forum Grunt
- Posts: 62
- Joined: Tue Feb 22, 2005 10:59 pm
- ID: 0
- Location: Melbourne, Australia
- GhostyGoo
- Forum Addict
- Posts: 2592
- Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 5:21 pm
- Alliance: 5PYM45T3R
- Race: HE WHO KEEPS ME HERE
- ID: 0
- Location: ZOOMING THROUGH YOUR EGO AT A ZILLION MILES AN HOUR
- Contact:
-
Honours and Awards
Yes, this pretty much answers the question Beyond what has already been said here, few have worked out that a massive deficit in either covert, attack or defence when marked up against your other two scores will seriously reduce your rank, this can be both infuriating and also very usefull
Goo
Goo
Spoiler
GhostyGoo wrote:Yesno.
the3rdlibra wrote:if it's a silly turnip head competition you want, i'm going to decline as i think i may have met my match in you vegetable brains.
Cersei Lannister wrote:Debasing? I am not the one drawing crazy pictures of force fielded stick figures.
Magical Monkeys & Grapefruit Migration:Hallowed are the Gò.Ó'ri™ **fixed**
- Psi Kiya Trist
- The Timeless One
- Posts: 7416
- Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2005 4:56 pm
- ID: 4266
- Location: Searching for my life in the real world
- Contact:
-
Honours and Awards
Anonymous wrote:how come many people have ??????????????? for there army and cash???
what is a better rank? would it be better to have a 231,,than to have a 2000?
https://talk.gatewa.rs/viewtopic.php?t=1394
first question there.
second questiom:
231 is better than 2000
~_+Psi Kiya Trist+_~
buck wrote:well psi, upkeeping order in the universe does play its tricks on your mind...