Is there any particular formula to work out the costs for each ascension? Are they tied to UP and income? Wanna work out my strategy before it goes live
~Jack
Era 24
-
- Forum Zombie
- Posts: 6140
- Joined: Sat Jun 17, 2006 12:23 am
- Alliance: Lone wolf
- Race: Slovenian
- ID: 82089
- Location: Slovenia
- High Empty
- Forum Addict
- Posts: 3274
- Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 2:34 pm
- Alliance: Omega
- Race: God's Left Hand
- ID: 102803
- Location: omg who care, pm me and i'll inform yea
Re: General Dissussion For Era 24
Should be in another 48 hours.. ppt will last that long anyways.
"Adversity has the effect of eliciting talents, which in prosperous circumstances would have lain dormant."
"Shut Up Features" -Replijake
"Shut Up Features" -Replijake
- Forum
- Site Admin
- Posts: 2844
- Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2005 1:52 pm
-
Honours and Awards
Re: congrats Era 23 - upcoming Era 24
costs outlined in updates page...
Neimenljivi wrote:Is there any particular formula to work out the costs for each ascension? Are they tied to UP and income? Wanna work out my strategy before it goes live
~Jack
Don't make me use this!!!
- Forum
- Site Admin
- Posts: 2844
- Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2005 1:52 pm
-
Honours and Awards
Re: General Dissussion For Era 24
done. although the limit is moved from 2x as strong, to 2.5x as strong
alucard110 wrote:calling for no MS damage if the attackers offence doesn't damage the defenders defense
Don't make me use this!!!
- Forum
- Site Admin
- Posts: 2844
- Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2005 1:52 pm
-
Honours and Awards
Re: General Dissussion For Era 24
done
Deerslayer wrote:Something else I was thinking about...limiting alliance sizes to say 10 members. There is that many ppl playing that an alliance should have 30 ppl in it. That will also make alliance power not so crazy at the end.
Don't make me use this!!!
- Forum
- Site Admin
- Posts: 2844
- Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2005 1:52 pm
-
Honours and Awards
Re: Era 24
note: merged to era 24 topics into one...sorry if any confusion, but allows me one place to shop
Don't make me use this!!!
- Dr. Daniel Jackson
- Forum Grunt
- Posts: 90
- Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2009 4:38 am
- Alliance: Phoenix Foundation
- Race: Archeologist
- ID: 28147
- Location: Quantum Server
Re: Era 24
Just got myself logged in etc.
can't wait to get going
can't wait to get going
Incase you hadn't noticed, I am roleplaying...
- alucard110
- Forum Irregular
- Posts: 368
- Joined: Mon Aug 13, 2007 8:16 pm
- Alliance: Shadow Stalkers
- Race: Ancient
- ID: 0
- Location: Sydney, Australia
Re: Era 24
era's looking excellent thus far, nice work!
how does 10k cap for AT's sound everyone? or at least 5k?
Forum, any thoughts on my earlier post on the possiblity fo alliance banks (with taxs) or alliance techs that everyone or the alliance leader could purchase?
and could we PLEASE have 2IC's!? please? lol, and how about alliance relations, ability to set war and peace between alliances?
i think its too late for the alliance techs or bank this era but does anyone like the idea cause i would like to expand on it if there is a chance that it's something that could be implemented.
how does 10k cap for AT's sound everyone? or at least 5k?
Forum, any thoughts on my earlier post on the possiblity fo alliance banks (with taxs) or alliance techs that everyone or the alliance leader could purchase?
and could we PLEASE have 2IC's!? please? lol, and how about alliance relations, ability to set war and peace between alliances?
i think its too late for the alliance techs or bank this era but does anyone like the idea cause i would like to expand on it if there is a chance that it's something that could be implemented.
- Forum
- Site Admin
- Posts: 2844
- Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2005 1:52 pm
-
Honours and Awards
Re: Era 24
thank youalucard110 wrote:era's looking excellent thus far, nice work!
i too would be curious thoughts on this one, versus more use as you go like i picture it nowalucard110 wrote:how does 10k cap for AT's sound everyone? or at least 5k?
not this era. is a big request.alucard110 wrote:Forum, any thoughts on my earlier post on the possiblity fo alliance banks (with taxs) or alliance techs that everyone or the alliance leader could purchase?
2ic with a 10 person alliance? and as for relations, maybe...but not this eraalucard110 wrote:and could we PLEASE have 2IC's!? please? lol, and how about alliance relations, ability to set war and peace between alliances?
a chance, yes...with a set 10 person alliance, options increase...and would run the alliance updates going forward, not just an era...alucard110 wrote:i think its too late for the alliance techs or bank this era but does anyone like the idea cause i would like to expand on it if there is a chance that it's something that could be implemented.
Don't make me use this!!!
- alucard110
- Forum Irregular
- Posts: 368
- Joined: Mon Aug 13, 2007 8:16 pm
- Alliance: Shadow Stalkers
- Race: Ancient
- ID: 0
- Location: Sydney, Australia
Re: Era 24
thanks for the quick reply, lol i understand that the alliance techs/bank would take a fair bit of work, consideration for a future era sounds great!
fair call on the 2ic's given the new alliance size caps.
was there anythought to putting in a max naq hit either based on a factor on average hits (current) or based on a factor of attackers vs defenders army sizes, or a bit of both.? i did a formula in one of the other threads last era that might work (will add link tonight)
cause this would at least mean ppl would have to use more turns to get "fed" eg, i got two 12T hits last era, one from an account one third the size of mine... would have been a little fairer if i'd had have to have used more AT's then just 12...
Again, not something that could happen straight away, but there are fair measures that could be put in place to stop HUGE hits (or at least make it a little harder)
fair call on the 2ic's given the new alliance size caps.
was there anythought to putting in a max naq hit either based on a factor on average hits (current) or based on a factor of attackers vs defenders army sizes, or a bit of both.? i did a formula in one of the other threads last era that might work (will add link tonight)
cause this would at least mean ppl would have to use more turns to get "fed" eg, i got two 12T hits last era, one from an account one third the size of mine... would have been a little fairer if i'd had have to have used more AT's then just 12...
Again, not something that could happen straight away, but there are fair measures that could be put in place to stop HUGE hits (or at least make it a little harder)
-
- Forum Zombie
- Posts: 6140
- Joined: Sat Jun 17, 2006 12:23 am
- Alliance: Lone wolf
- Race: Slovenian
- ID: 82089
- Location: Slovenia
Re: Era 24
alucard110 wrote:was there anythought to putting in a max naq hit either based on a factor on average hits (current) or based on a factor of attackers vs defenders army sizes, or a bit of both.? i did a formula in one of the other threads last era that might work (will add link tonight)
cause this would at least mean ppl would have to use more turns to get "fed" eg, i got two 12T hits last era, one from an account one third the size of mine... would have been a little fairer if i'd had have to have used more AT's then just 12...
Again, not something that could happen straight away, but there are fair measures that could be put in place to stop HUGE hits (or at least make it a little harder)
By doing so people who get fed big time would still get fed big time, you'd only remove the element of getting lucky hits when you find someone buying new spy level/UP in bulk/techs in bulk/MS/sniping other people's naq etc etc, just another tactic that would get removed due to feeders..And that would be a big shame..
~Jack
- High Empty
- Forum Addict
- Posts: 3274
- Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 2:34 pm
- Alliance: Omega
- Race: God's Left Hand
- ID: 102803
- Location: omg who care, pm me and i'll inform yea
Re: Era 24
ok so unsure
There should be a Cap on untraining miners
500,000 to 1,000,000 naq
Plus
adding in 2 more supporter status bonus, where you can only select one option once.
Changing/fixing one of the tech options to add 5% techs instead of +5 techs. So that's 5% of max techs.
Turn limit based on Ascensions.
Every ascension you can store an extra 250 turns?
There should be a Cap on untraining miners
500,000 to 1,000,000 naq
Plus
adding in 2 more supporter status bonus, where you can only select one option once.
Changing/fixing one of the tech options to add 5% techs instead of +5 techs. So that's 5% of max techs.
Turn limit based on Ascensions.
Every ascension you can store an extra 250 turns?
"Adversity has the effect of eliciting talents, which in prosperous circumstances would have lain dormant."
"Shut Up Features" -Replijake
"Shut Up Features" -Replijake
- High Empty
- Forum Addict
- Posts: 3274
- Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 2:34 pm
- Alliance: Omega
- Race: God's Left Hand
- ID: 102803
- Location: omg who care, pm me and i'll inform yea
Re: Era 24
you might be able to make the untraining reset after every ascension.
"Adversity has the effect of eliciting talents, which in prosperous circumstances would have lain dormant."
"Shut Up Features" -Replijake
"Shut Up Features" -Replijake
- knight
- The Lulz
- Posts: 1774
- Joined: Thu May 01, 2008 2:41 pm
- ID: 0
- Location: somewhere else
Re: Era 24
High Empty wrote:you might be able to make the untraining reset after every ascension.
ALERT: Ascending Kills ALL units in your realm,
- Bernie Sanders
- Forum Regular
- Posts: 725
- Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2007 4:05 pm
- Alliance: Democratic Socialists
- Race: Jewish
- ID: 1907203
- Alternate name(s): Bernie Sanders
- Location: Eastern US
Re: Era 24
but the price will stay constant even after ascension.
because the price of untraining isnt based on the amount of miners.
the suggestion was that the price be reset after every ascension.
because the price of untraining isnt based on the amount of miners.
the suggestion was that the price be reset after every ascension.
First she was like...
I talk in this color when corporations pay their fair share of taxes and don't evade US taxes by stashing profits overseas.
I talk in this color when the wealthiest top 1/10th of 1% don't own 50% of the nation's wealth.
I talk in this color when the wealthy, influential elites of this country don't have unbalanced influence over the economy, media, and government - allowing to regularly further their own interests.
I talk in this color when the US joins every other industrialized nation on Earth and guarantees healthcare for all people.
I talk in this color when 98% of all new income doesn't go into the hands of the wealthiest top 1%.
Then she was all like...Support wrote:Thank you, Bernie.
Then they were all...Support wrote:Damn it Bernie.
Mercury Rising wrote:Damn it Bernie!
Affirmation wrote:Damn it Bernie...
Spoiler
Bernie Sanders wrote:One of the biggest mistakes our government made after the financial crisis was not prosecuting the people responsible for the greed, recklessness and illegal behavior that crashed our economy and ruined the lives of millions of Americans. It is not acceptable that many young people have criminal records for smoking marijuana, while the CEOs of banks whose illegal behavior helped destroy our economy do not.
I talk in this color when corporations pay their fair share of taxes and don't evade US taxes by stashing profits overseas.
I talk in this color when the wealthiest top 1/10th of 1% don't own 50% of the nation's wealth.
I talk in this color when the wealthy, influential elites of this country don't have unbalanced influence over the economy, media, and government - allowing to regularly further their own interests.
I talk in this color when the US joins every other industrialized nation on Earth and guarantees healthcare for all people.
I talk in this color when 98% of all new income doesn't go into the hands of the wealthiest top 1%.