StarGateWars Forums

Guild wrote:if they are the best player with the best account then so be it, you dont see people on main complaining because they dont have the best account from the beginning

Umm yeah, they do.

Also, you are a good tag teaming partner, or so I heard.

also im thinking of taking off the auto boot after there are 10 users. I think the tourney goes fast enough without it.

BMMJ13 wrote:

Jim wrote:

Guild wrote:

Rudy Pena wrote:

Guild wrote:i like the idea in theory , but you dont want to hold people back because they worked the mechanics and did better than others , that doesnt make sense

And whats to stop the winner from winning everytime?


Its no fun joining something when you know some could be winning all the time.

i find that some people only talk to me when the arena has started to specifically be able to tag team people *cough jim *cough....

I get ronery.

Jim talks to everyone about tag teaming, the dirty girl.

did thinnk he must be talking to everyone, even the guys he was sayin to attack to one side then sayin to attack the other group.... the crafty wabbit

Sol wrote:also im thinking of taking off the auto boot after there are 10 users. I think the tourney goes fast enough without it.

I would agree with this. It seems to go very fast at the end. Maybe if there has been no casualties in the past 24 hours, it kicks whoever has been least active, however that would only come into play if it's a stalemate.

Guild wrote:

BMMJ13 wrote:

Jim wrote:

Guild wrote:

Rudy Pena wrote:

Guild wrote:i like the idea in theory , but you dont want to hold people back because they worked the mechanics and did better than others , that doesnt make sense

And whats to stop the winner from winning everytime?


Its no fun joining something when you know some could be winning all the time.

i find that some people only talk to me when the arena has started to specifically be able to tag team people *cough jim *cough....

I get ronery.

Jim talks to everyone about tag teaming, the dirty girl.

did thinnk he must be talking to everyone, even the guys he was sayin to attack to one side then sayin to attack the other group.... the crafty wabbit

SUSH!!!!!! your ruining my plans

Sol wrote:also im thinking of taking off the auto boot after there are 10 users. I think the tourney goes fast enough without it.

Its not about making the tourney go fast, its about forcing people to take action rather than turtle. However, the "most turns used" way of calculating it is flawed as it can essentially come down to who joined the arena first. Perhaps make it that every 12 hours it kicks one person that has used less than X amount of turns, say 3000. This way active players dont need to worry about it but it will still deal with turtles.

Jim wrote:

Sol wrote:also im thinking of taking off the auto boot after there are 10 users. I think the tourney goes fast enough without it.

Its not about making the tourney go fast, its about forcing people to take action rather than turtle. However, the "most turns used" way of calculating it is flawed as it can essentially come down to who joined the arena first.

It's not exactly flawed. If someone joins the tourney straight up and dumps a crap load of turns on people continously, compared to someone who joins later, then they are more active than the other person. Regardless of when their timezone is.

Sol wrote:

Jim wrote:

Sol wrote:also im thinking of taking off the auto boot after there are 10 users. I think the tourney goes fast enough without it.

Its not about making the tourney go fast, its about forcing people to take action rather than turtle. However, the "most turns used" way of calculating it is flawed as it can essentially come down to who joined the arena first.

It's not exactly flawed. If someone joins the tourney straight up and dumps a crap load of turns on people continously, compared to someone who joins later, then they are more active than the other person. Regardless of when their timezone is.

I think the point being made is if two people join 3 days apart, and both use every single AT avalible to them, the person who joined later is automaticly removed due to spending less AT because they had less AT to spend.

Lore wrote:

Sol wrote:

Jim wrote:

Sol wrote:also im thinking of taking off the auto boot after there are 10 users. I think the tourney goes fast enough without it.

Its not about making the tourney go fast, its about forcing people to take action rather than turtle. However, the "most turns used" way of calculating it is flawed as it can essentially come down to who joined the arena first.

It's not exactly flawed. If someone joins the tourney straight up and dumps a crap load of turns on people continously, compared to someone who joins later, then they are more active than the other person. Regardless of when their timezone is.

I think the point being made is if two people join 3 days apart, and both use every single AT avalible to them, the person who joined later is automaticly removed due to spending less AT because they had less AT to spend.

even one or two hours apart. thats what it came down to last time: nearly everyone in the arena had used all of their turns as soon as they got them but bj was kicked because he joined last.

Juliette wrote:

Sol wrote:if you're afraid someone will win continuously just tag team with a mate and bring them down when they enter the arena.

Word.

See I don't play arena because of my
Level of awesomeness on ascended means 50+ people would tag me every time o~o.

@auto boot comments, it is disabled this round (although i just realised that it still says it on the arena details page).