CS attack/defence weaponizing increase

For discussion on balance, bugs, likes, dislikes of recently released features.
User avatar
ƒëmmë
Forum Elite
Posts: 1931
Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2011 5:44 am
Alternate name(s): ƒëmmë ƒatalë
temptress
cleo_catra

Re: CS attack/defence weaponizing increase

yes, much happier now :)
Image
To fight and conquer in all your battles is not supreme excellence;
supreme excellence consists in breaking the enemy's resistance without fighting.
-Sun Tzu, the Art of War
31/07/2012 6:13:16 AM Hope Light ID's mean nothing imo if you can back yourself up.
31/07/2012 6:13:22 AM Hope Light only **Filtered** hide them.
Be careful who you trust, even the devil was once an angel
veritas vos liberabit
Forums own rules
http://stargatewars.herebegames.com/vie ... 7#p2510387
Spoiler
Section Admins - who will be 'in charge' of the section in question. They will be responsible for the overall feel of the section, the setup/structure, and most importantly the community/users in the section. This will incorporate the old 'ombudsman' role. And insofar as the Section Admin is responsible for the users, they are also responsible for the high level mod behaviour towards the users.
So -as a user - if you have an issue with how you are treated, rules, bans, whatever --goto the section admin... They are there for you!

There is no 'reporting structure' in this setup -- tech, mod, and section admins are all on equal footing, each with their own (somewhat overlapping) responsibilities.
Mods report directly to the mod admin, and indirectly to the section admin for the section in which they mod.
User avatar
Urke
Forum Grunt
Posts: 73
Joined: Mon Sep 27, 2010 1:06 pm
Alternate name(s): Night Hawk
Location: .si

Re: CS attack/defence weaponizing increase

Lebe wrote:Great.... log into arena asap. With decent production level, you could have 30Q strike after 2 TCs + one more for weapon repairs. Then invest everywhing into CS weapons and start slaughtering players who will log after this time, because they will not have any DMU for weapon repairs, no DMU to build CS to defend themself and they will only loose 2,5B planets + 500M best def weapons and they could only watch....
...and count into it, that there is no penalization, if attacker fail a hit and your CS withouth any shields will not loose any weapons fighting CS that freshly entered arena.

We could then easily say, players who will log 12 hours after arena will start, will be immediately treatened with players with 40Q strike + 10Q strike from CS (if they have enough DMU), with no way of defending themselves.

Argumet, that is saying, that you could get DMU in arena by attacking other players is correct(if you qill build up at least 50Q strike..... or be wasting lots of ATs on almost killed players), but gitting DMU in team deathmatch arenas by attacking players is not correct. Most player have only 2 possible attacks. Most frequent ones are destroy and DM?
--------------------------
To equip all 20M slots on CS, would require 4,4Q DMU... Lest say, average CS with 10Q strike will destroy 250K shields on one attack. It is over 70T DMU, witch is 3 TCs for average player.
Only thing, that this update will make is, that majority of players, will not investing a single DMU into CS. So few rest players will only had to invest into CS weapons and they would get over 10Q undestroyable strike against majority of players.
------------------------
Another thing is, that prices before this update in arenas final hours were astronomicaly high to equip CS, because no1 have any income planets left, all DMU is stored in weapons and each hit is very costly to repair. Especialy if both players have higher strike as is theyr defence, not enough planets to DM and each hit cost you over 5T DMU and each hit on you cost you 10T DMU (for example).
------------------------
To make it short. Entering into arena with 0 CS is very very bad idea.
Increasing astronomicaly prices to equip CS as is proposed will eliminate almost all CS from combat.

All of it lead me only one question, after each player in arena is allowed to use only 2 or more types of attacks... Why do you want to penalize so badly players, who invested time and resources in theyr CS at expense of other stats?


Long story short... It is because person E, person T and person L didnt win the tourney yet. Yeah it is that simple. :D =D>
User avatar
Juliette
Verified
The Queen
Posts: 31802
Joined: Sun Feb 06, 2005 6:57 pm
Race: Royalty
ID: 4323
Alternate name(s): Cersei Lannister
Location: Ultima Thule

Re: CS attack/defence weaponizing increase

:smt043 If you think Sol and ETL are working together, you are even more amusing than I thought. :lol:
Nice. :)
Image
User avatar
Urke
Forum Grunt
Posts: 73
Joined: Mon Sep 27, 2010 1:06 pm
Alternate name(s): Night Hawk
Location: .si

Re: CS attack/defence weaponizing increase

Juliette wrote::smt043 If you think Sol and ETL are working together, you are even more amusing than I thought. :lol:
Nice. :)


I love you, too Juliette. :smt060
User avatar
Juliette
Verified
The Queen
Posts: 31802
Joined: Sun Feb 06, 2005 6:57 pm
Race: Royalty
ID: 4323
Alternate name(s): Cersei Lannister
Location: Ultima Thule

Re: CS attack/defence weaponizing increase

Urke wrote:
Juliette wrote::smt043 If you think Sol and ETL are working together, you are even more amusing than I thought. :lol:
Nice. :)
I love you, too Juliette. :smt060
:smt058 Happy.
Image
Post Reply

Return to “Discussion on Released Enhancements”