Making ascended standalone?

Specific to server: "GateWars: Battle of the Ascended"
User avatar
Commander Vimes
Forum Expert
Posts: 1384
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 12:22 pm
Alliance: T I T α N S Commander
Race: Vaguely Humanoid
ID: 87970
Location: Southampton, England

Re: Making ascended standalone?

Jedi~Tank wrote:Trying to force people to play will only cause more disinterest. Although the deas are very good, just not practical at this point.

I think to that the proponents of all of these attachments and penalties and such to main for not playing ascended is from you lot that dont bother with main so much and play ascended all the time or most of your time. This is not addressed to all, but if the shoes fits wear it.


i guess forcing the issue may cause a hostile response but how else could the two become more connected? minor changes will be ignored by most i guess so it would need to be something big and perhaps controversial.....

you say the ideas previously made are good but not practical, can you think of ways that they could be made practical? :)
Image
Image
It's all for the greater gooood
msn commandervimes@live.co.uk
User avatar
Coulson
Forum Regular
Posts: 607
Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2011 3:14 am
Alliance: S.H.I.E.L.D.
Race: Human
ID: 75836

Re: Making ascended standalone?

SuperSaiyan wrote:
Stuart Gordon wrote:You'd explain this in that a god's got a need to walk between their people for them to workship him...
It can be explained simply by the sg storyline.
the Ori had power because they had worshipers. If the Asc. Being's main worshiper is on vac./inactive then its not giving power to the being.
That's exactly what I've been thinking.
User avatar
jedi~tank
Forum Zombie
Posts: 9936
Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 12:43 pm
ID: 0
Location: Creepin in the back door

Re: Making ascended standalone?

Commander Vimes wrote:
Jedi~Tank wrote:Trying to force people to play will only cause more disinterest. Although the deas are very good, just not practical at this point.

I think to that the proponents of all of these attachments and penalties and such to main for not playing ascended is from you lot that dont bother with main so much and play ascended all the time or most of your time. This is not addressed to all, but if the shoes fits wear it.


i guess forcing the issue may cause a hostile response but how else could the two become more connected? minor changes will be ignored by most i guess so it would need to be something big and perhaps controversial.....

you say the ideas previously made are good but not practical, can you think of ways that they could be made practical? :)

Wait for there to be more players on this game.
Image

Image

Image

"What I want to see is a tight knit group not a collection of people pulling in different directions"
Deni
User avatar
Commander Vimes
Forum Expert
Posts: 1384
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 12:22 pm
Alliance: T I T α N S Commander
Race: Vaguely Humanoid
ID: 87970
Location: Southampton, England

Re: Making ascended standalone?

Jedi~Tank wrote:
Commander Vimes wrote:
Jedi~Tank wrote:Trying to force people to play will only cause more disinterest. Although the deas are very good, just not practical at this point.

I think to that the proponents of all of these attachments and penalties and such to main for not playing ascended is from you lot that dont bother with main so much and play ascended all the time or most of your time. This is not addressed to all, but if the shoes fits wear it.


i guess forcing the issue may cause a hostile response but how else could the two become more connected? minor changes will be ignored by most i guess so it would need to be something big and perhaps controversial.....

you say the ideas previously made are good but not practical, can you think of ways that they could be made practical? :)

Wait for there to be more players on this game.


stop making all the new players soil themselves and there might be lol
i fear the only way this game can grow now is with mainstream advertising and up to date gameplay.... :-k
Image
Image
It's all for the greater gooood
msn commandervimes@live.co.uk
Cwalen
Fledgling Forumer
Posts: 167
Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2012 1:33 am
ID: 0

Re: Making ascended standalone?

Standalone?

It is the pinnacle!

Get out of NG, play some time in main.

Ascend.

or be a big shte in a little toilet bowl.
User avatar
Field Marshall
Forum Zombie
Posts: 6112
Joined: Tue Sep 13, 2005 10:30 pm

Re: Making ascended standalone?

Cwalen wrote:Standalone?

It is the pinnacle!

Get out of NG, play some time in main.

Ascend.

or be a big shte in a little toilet bowl.


Nearly a whole year old...you'd have thought the mods would have closed this down already :-k
Sol wrote:
Field Marshall wrote:
Sol wrote:It's not going to destroy your life :P
Really?

I think this is sig worthy in fact.
:o my first sigging. I sigged you too. <3
High Empty wrote:however people shouldn't have lvl 33 and 200mil spies and try to be in the top 10, it's unhealthy.
Cwalen
Fledgling Forumer
Posts: 167
Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2012 1:33 am
ID: 0

Re: Making ascended standalone?

The forum is in a sad state of disrepair.

Sucks to be searching for information on it.
Good to get the notice of the few left paying attention.
JasonJay
Forum Irregular
Posts: 408
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 2:42 am
ID: 0
Location: Pretoria South Africa

Re: Making ascended standalone?

HEUHEUHEU
Cwalen
Fledgling Forumer
Posts: 167
Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2012 1:33 am
ID: 0

Re: Making ascended standalone?

Mainstream advertising is a two edged sword.

A lot of new people will have a chance to notice SGW exists. Money flows out of the system. More importantly for the devs, Time.

I don't think SGW has a 30K a year advertising budget. Last time I looked, that would buy you 10k of advice and 20 of add placement. 30 to 40 thousand new players, who at least looked at the register screen.

20% take up rate for the first few weeks, falling to five after two weeks, 1% or less playing a whole month.

I assume, without any concrete evidence, that SGW would be lucky to float 10K in advertising.
Beyond the initial investment, there would be the costs of working out how to place the adds without being able to afford professional advice, Ensuring that the landing pad for having hundreds of new people successfully sifted for those that will really enjoy star gate wars (new forums, massive mod load, plenty of new documentation) was prepared?

These days, you can trickle a few adds out, very cheaply and with a few weeks worth of NAQ sold on the $ market.

The real challenge is giving the new players an experience that inspires them to spend 500% of their CPC in the first week, 2000% in two weeks, or managing that 1%.
User avatar
Loki™
Forum Elder
Posts: 2464
Joined: Sat Sep 02, 2006 12:43 am
Alliance: Jötunheim
Race: System Lord
ID: 41339
Alternate name(s): Lloth, Sargonnas, D4ywalk3r

Re: Making ascended standalone?

Make it standalone so I can stop playing.
Image
Image
Spoiler
Image

Image
And Loki saw every thing that he had farmed, and, behold, it was very good.
Spoiler
George Hazard says:
thats what happens, HVE takes your soul and gives you an awesome high
when you leave, you can't live without it
ImageImage

The forces of Loki™ rush in full force, and inflict 1,086,054,534,340,000 damage on Pooop's forces!
It was confirmed that 12,620,737 of Pooop's forces fell at the hands of Loki™'s assult.

The forces of Pooop fought back with all they could, and managed to inflict 481,837,854,506,000 damage on Loki™'s forces!
They managed to eradicate 1,988,050 of Loki™'s troops.
User avatar
Sol
Forum Addict
Posts: 3807
Joined: Sat Apr 11, 2009 9:09 pm
ID: 0

Re: Making ascended standalone?

She's an old topic this one!
I'm interested to see what people think (again) of letting new players into ascended WITHOUT having to go through main, so a sort of semi-standalone idea. Not completely void of main. In fact perhaps upon sign up a main account is made...
Either way why not let people jump straight into ascended.
Field Marshall wrote:
Sol wrote:It's not going to destroy your life :P
Really?
I think this is sig worthy in fact.
Image
matty~
Forum Regular
Posts: 590
Joined: Mon Apr 25, 2011 2:23 pm
Alliance: RIcos warlords
Race: i need sleep
ID: 1950534
Alternate name(s): ~matty~
xzxmattyxzx

Re: Making ascended standalone?

why? and no . sounds weird

and im not reading these posts just opening post
Image
dont fight a retard..they'lll drag you down and beat you with experience
Image
Spoiler
Image
Some say im insane....I say..My Sanity just took a break

Im so far from the grapevine, im buying grapes from the supermarket.
BEWARE MY SCOPE ZOOMS HEAT SEAKING SCOPE . PRO SNIPER BABY
User avatar
Sol
Forum Addict
Posts: 3807
Joined: Sat Apr 11, 2009 9:09 pm
ID: 0

Re: Making ascended standalone?

matty~ wrote:why? and no . sounds weird

and im not reading these posts just opening post

More users, what else?
Field Marshall wrote:
Sol wrote:It's not going to destroy your life :P
Really?
I think this is sig worthy in fact.
Image
matty~
Forum Regular
Posts: 590
Joined: Mon Apr 25, 2011 2:23 pm
Alliance: RIcos warlords
Race: i need sleep
ID: 1950534
Alternate name(s): ~matty~
xzxmattyxzx

Re: Making ascended standalone?

so then your saying if a main account is made if signed up for ascended wth does that mean 3 accounts would be able to have under 1 persons control? no.

Sol wrote: Not completely void of main. In fact perhaps upon sign up a main account is made...
Either way why not let people jump straight into ascended.
Image
dont fight a retard..they'lll drag you down and beat you with experience
Image
Spoiler
Image
Some say im insane....I say..My Sanity just took a break

Im so far from the grapevine, im buying grapes from the supermarket.
BEWARE MY SCOPE ZOOMS HEAT SEAKING SCOPE . PRO SNIPER BABY
User avatar
Sol
Forum Addict
Posts: 3807
Joined: Sat Apr 11, 2009 9:09 pm
ID: 0

Re: Making ascended standalone?

matty~ wrote:so then your saying if a main account is made if signed up for ascended wth does that mean 3 accounts would be able to have under 1 persons control? no.

Sol wrote: Not completely void of main. In fact perhaps upon sign up a main account is made...
Either way why not let people jump straight into ascended.

So you think because the sign up can be the other way around it automatically means everyone can have another multi? That's a very big jump for anyone to make...
No, the whole two account sets will still be the maximum. The idea is basically to let people get straight into ascended, not wait a few weeks to ascend in main, or push through NG.
Field Marshall wrote:
Sol wrote:It's not going to destroy your life :P
Really?
I think this is sig worthy in fact.
Image
Post Reply

Return to “Ascended General”