Negative naq
-
th0r_
- Fledgling Forumer
- Posts: 216
- Joined: Fri Jun 05, 2009 6:03 am
- Race: ancient
- ID: 0
Negative naq
What's up with it? I've seen someone with -naq.
-
Sarevok
- Forum Addict
- Posts: 4042
- Joined: Wed May 09, 2007 7:42 pm
- Race: NanoTiMaster
- ID: 0
Re: Negative naq
Someone attacks player A, player A deposits naq, server says both are good, therefor, having Neg Naq
viewtopic.php?f=13&t=162732
Suggestions, Comments please
Suggestions, Comments please
R8 wrote:TEAM WORK WILL BEAT $$ ANYDAY OF THE WEEKangel wrote:Except the payday [-X
12agnar0k wrote:Also it's still not a war game, you have att/def weps yes, but you also have uu and UP, does this mean its a sex game, oh no, XRATEDSGW, THIS GAME IS PORN!
Ban Admin
<+CABAL> so adminHere, ever thought about playing SGW? :b
<~adminHere> cabal - i do
<+CABAL>
<+Sarevok> Cabal, look up Jtest
<~adminHere> no -not jtest
<~adminHere> another
<+Sarevok> :O
* +CABAL screens
<+CABAL> :b
* +Sarevok Ban's Admin
-
lone dragon
- Forum Expert
- Posts: 1153
- Joined: Thu Feb 12, 2009 5:09 am
- Race: something
- Location: Australia
Re: Negative naq
th0r_ wrote:What's up with it? I've seen someone with -naq.
I have had negative uu and naq before but me banking or training is that some kinda glitch? normally -1 for uu or naq.
Spoiler
天龍; Fight a good fight...as I will rise from the ashes..
-
Tekki
- Forum Addict
- Posts: 4332
- Joined: Wed Aug 23, 2006 12:37 pm
- ID: 0
Re: Negative naq
The tiny amounts say of negative UU are usually a counting glitch. i've certainly had -38 to -48 UU and it fixes itself on the turn.
However bigger amounts usually trigger the Autoban
However bigger amounts usually trigger the Autoban
Spoiler
Initial masser on Field Marshal's 120t defence and on Rodwolf's 177t defence.
The forces of Rodwolf fought back with all they could, and managed to inflict 178,947,245,996,720 damage on Tekki's forces!
The forces of Rodwolf fought back with all they could, and managed to inflict 3 damage on Tekki's forces!
The forces of Rodwolf fought back with all they could, and managed to inflict 178,947,245,996,720 damage on Tekki's forces!
The forces of Rodwolf fought back with all they could, and managed to inflict 3 damage on Tekki's forces!
A sentiment I can agree with, except some of them have never done a good job. For further details, PM me INGAME Id 9095.Jedi~Tank wrote:@ADMINS- ALL ADMINS, this is the absolute worst game forum I have ever seen (this sentiment is shared by many) It is amazing how ya;ll can go from good job to complete garbage in no time at all.
Jedi~Tank
---
Spoiler
-
CABAL
- Forum Expert
- Posts: 1310
- Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2008 1:44 am
- Alliance: Aquila Ignis
- Race: Death Watch
- ID: 0
- Location: Holy Terra
Re: Negative naq
'tis caused by the floor() function. Per turn, you aren't actually getting a 'whole' uu. floor() basically takes a decimal and 'rounds' it down to the nearest integer.
So, even though it might say you have, i.e. 364,734 covert agents, it might actually be 364,734.95
Hence why you would get neg uu.
So, even though it might say you have, i.e. 364,734 covert agents, it might actually be 364,734.95
Hence why you would get neg uu.
MS-1 -> T-26 -> T-46 -> T-28 -> KV -> KV-3 -> IS -> IS-3 -> IS-4 -> IS-7