why?

Ombudsman Case Archives
shedload
Fledgling Forumer
Posts: 156
Joined: Mon Jul 10, 2006 8:24 am
ID: 0
Location: manchester england

Re: why?

Offensive Bias wrote:Inciting a riot against a person by referring to issues regarding the person out of context (i.e. off-topic) is considered personal abuse and will receive a warning.


So is this in the actual rules or is this your opinion ? i have looked through the rules and cant find a reference to "inciting riots" , IMO it is your interpretation of the rules that ties "inciting riots" to personal abuse !

Jobsworth me thinks :-k
Image
Image
Image
User avatar
Juliette
Verified
The Queen
Posts: 31802
Joined: Sun Feb 06, 2005 6:57 pm
Race: Royalty
ID: 4323
Alternate name(s): Cersei Lannister
Location: Ultima Thule

Re: why?

Tetrismonkey wrote:I'm sorry radiance, but i disagree with your statement. However, this is not the area to discuss such matters.
That, mister, should be the END of your post. How exceptionally professional of you. See PM, and Admin's post.
Image
User avatar
zeekomkommer
Forum Addict
Posts: 2961
Joined: Sat Jun 23, 2007 9:38 am
Alliance: sigma leader
Race: systemlord
ID: 70578
Location: belgium

Re: why?

okey,

i think it's safe to conclude that bebita if you want to bring up clarkeys past that you make a topic about it. apart from that you can post in vendetta threads aslong as you don't bring them off topic

zeek
Image
Locked

Return to “Case Archives”