SSG EnterTheLion wrote:Ryuujin Jakka wrote:SSG EnterTheLion wrote:why is it stupid? because people would actually have to build something? lol
Do you think in real war a nation could just survive on a roving attacking force without a defensive perimeter? SGW is full of holes comparatively. It allows alot of the weak to prosper.
jason just fixed the damn 1 attack mass thing for whoever was complaining about it , what do you want a world where the underdog never has a chance?
WTH is the point of that theres no point in any wars then , what if at the end of a war someone has just enough naq for a good strike to have a great online , who are you to say he has to pull 100T naq out his ass just to build a defence , then on that
he would have to build his defence every single time he got hit just to fight back ,
its a contradictive thing your talking about here....
Well then underdogs shouldn't challenge the strong. Do you see Luxemburgh challenge the UK? Or do you think Iran, for all it's bravado would dare attack an American base? There are plenty of ways so called underdogs can build up...and then try to mass. The point is not to go piss off people stronger when one is not ready.
even if this idea was plausable i think that it wouldnt go into affect like this stupid bank naq stealing idea a guy came up with because all the "bigger" players would just endouge thereselfs in everybodies bank and then that would even make me quit the game..
but seriously a defence equal to the offence, eh lets see here.. are commando squads defensive? no. they are offensive, what about the navy and airforce? offensive, only when people attack our country first is when we get defensive by invading theres and taking everything they can.
so the opposing force has to do the same no matter the size, take what we give and stop complaining.
















![[019.gif] :smt019](./images/smilies/019.gif)
