caesar2 wrote:Deni, actually... it was written in my topic more than twice that I recieved Board Warning cuse previous cases with that rule. It was explain like C2 is old forum user and should know rules, and from his "masking" hystory he should know...
Well... am not sure if this was the official statement of section mod, but am sure more mods posted this reason. Because, mod can give verbal warning, or board warning, like rules says. There it is all up tto mods, how they decide. The decision was not explained. Mod only copy/pasted me rules, and I asked. Another official answer was another copy/paste in another form.
And a lot of mods posting, how old user I am and how shouyld I know.
Deni, officialy or not, reread my topic. There is written a lot of **Filtered**.
C2, I for sure would expect from an experienced user like yourself to be able to judge if a message is appropriate for the forums or not. I personally do not see the need for any profanity around the forums and I doubt you will disagree with me.
If someone posts a message that contains profanity, I would check if the poster has a history of posting profanity and if they have received any recent verbal warnings asking them to abstain from posting profanity. If that was the case, then I would give them an official warning. If not, a polite note asking them to abstain from posting messages containing profanity would be the course of action.
The question regarding your warning is, if "****ing" falls into the masking rule as an attempt to circumvent the current filter or if it is already censored and thus not subject to the masking rule. As I said already, I do consider it the latter.