If i got a chance to rip off a known scammer hell yes i would
![[060.gif] :smt060](./images/smilies/060.gif)
![[060.gif] :smt060](./images/smilies/060.gif)

RoKeT wrote:Rabbid Thom wrote:im not against what you did
im just saying your pretty much asking for people to "cliam" they were scammed and you could end up handing over trillions to someone who just came across this thread
a persons word is worth nothing
dosn't matter how clean, how much good trade feedback they have just means the victim is easier
im just saying so you don't end up giving it back to the or another scammer who just sell it for $
see clarkeys nailing it
So then what do you think I should do, I mean now taht I have it and all HAHHAHAHAHAHAHA
I do like the Donate to a charity where I can produce a receipt I'm not sure yet
*yes I'm making this a joke, it is... sorry but if you really think this shouldn't have happened I just can't figure out why* so to me it is a joke!!!
The police are an authority, supported by law. Totally different from vigilante justice, and you can see from the Trayvon Martin case how well vigilantes and justice match.MEZZANINE wrote:When the police take stolen goods from a criminal does that make them criminals ???Cersei Lannister wrote:Scamming is scamming.
Robin Hood was a thief, an outlaw.
It would not matter what I called him. He would be a thief. You cannot 'steal back' what was stolen without becoming a thief yourself.MEZZANINE wrote:If there were no police ( as there are not here ) and a robber took something off you, say he stole your mobile phone, if a friend of yours stole the phone back and gave it to you, would you call your friend a thief ???


xdaku wrote:play dead, works for me
she goes to call the ambulance, jump out the window and run for it
xdaku wrote:though I heard he was talking **Filtered** about you the other day.... I believe he was probably just taking a **Filtered** an people mistook the sounds for his voice
Xdaku wrote:yea people like brothers don't shower they go to car washes a proper "wash"
dark hero wrote:yeh **Filtered** that
that is money I would rather spend on cheap chinese **Filtered**
and drugs...
both at the same time


Cersei Lannister wrote:The police are an authority, supported by law. Totally different from vigilante justice, and you can see from the Trayvon Martin case how well vigilantes and justice match.MEZZANINE wrote:When the police take stolen goods from a criminal does that make them criminals ???Cersei Lannister wrote:Scamming is scamming.
Robin Hood was a thief, an outlaw.It would not matter what I called him. He would be a thief. You cannot 'steal back' what was stolen without becoming a thief yourself.MEZZANINE wrote:If there were no police ( as there are not here ) and a robber took something off you, say he stole your mobile phone, if a friend of yours stole the phone back and gave it to you, would you call your friend a thief ???

Cersei Lannister wrote:It would not matter what I called him. He would be a thief. You cannot 'steal back' what was stolen without becoming a thief yourself.

Cersei Lannister wrote:The police are an authority, supported by law. Totally different from vigilante justice, and you can see from the Trayvon Martin case how well vigilantes and justice match.MEZZANINE wrote:When the police take stolen goods from a criminal does that make them criminals ???Cersei Lannister wrote:Scamming is scamming.
Robin Hood was a thief, an outlaw.It would not matter what I called him. He would be a thief. You cannot 'steal back' what was stolen without becoming a thief yourself.MEZZANINE wrote:If there were no police ( as there are not here ) and a robber took something off you, say he stole your mobile phone, if a friend of yours stole the phone back and gave it to you, would you call your friend a thief ???
Drakodan wrote:Cersei Lannister wrote:It would not matter what I called him. He would be a thief. You cannot 'steal back' what was stolen without becoming a thief yourself.
Theft implies ownership. Stolen goods are not owned by the thief. Therefore, I would not call it being a thief yourself to simply reclaim them.



MEZZANINE wrote:Drakodan wrote:Cersei Lannister wrote:It would not matter what I called him. He would be a thief. You cannot 'steal back' what was stolen without becoming a thief yourself.
Theft implies ownership. Stolen goods are not owned by the thief. Therefore, I would not call it being a thief yourself to simply reclaim them.
Likes ^
Of all the argument here, that one is the simplest, clearest and hits the nail right on the head

xdaku wrote:play dead, works for me
she goes to call the ambulance, jump out the window and run for it
xdaku wrote:though I heard he was talking **Filtered** about you the other day.... I believe he was probably just taking a **Filtered** an people mistook the sounds for his voice
Xdaku wrote:yea people like brothers don't shower they go to car washes a proper "wash"
dark hero wrote:yeh **Filtered** that
that is money I would rather spend on cheap chinese **Filtered**
and drugs...
both at the same time


RoKeT wrote:have a 35USD bid so far
everyone behind the scenes is loving me for this HHAHHAHAHAHAH
I really feel like I can get more, who says 50USD!?!?!?!
MEZZANINE wrote:Cersei Lannister wrote:The police are an authority, supported by law. Totally different from vigilante justice, and you can see from the Trayvon Martin case how well vigilantes and justice match.MEZZANINE wrote:When the police take stolen goods from a criminal does that make them criminals ???Cersei Lannister wrote:Scamming is scamming.
Robin Hood was a thief, an outlaw.It would not matter what I called him. He would be a thief. You cannot 'steal back' what was stolen without becoming a thief yourself.MEZZANINE wrote:If there were no police ( as there are not here ) and a robber took something off you, say he stole your mobile phone, if a friend of yours stole the phone back and gave it to you, would you call your friend a thief ???
I believe the odd phrase that covers that is ''cutting off your nose to spite your face''
You would rather lose your property than have someone recover it for you
No Roket does not have the authority to police scamming..... thats the whole point, no one polices it, they should, admin should not permit scamming and if he stepped up others like Roket would have legal recourse and not have to take matters into their own hands.
I dont see the comparison to Trayvon Martin, as far as I know Roket wasnt carrying a gun and no one got hurt or could get hurt in any way
Motive - Selfless to help others
Action - Questionable
Result - Scammer loses, scammed get their stuff back, all goodDrakodan wrote:Cersei Lannister wrote:It would not matter what I called him. He would be a thief. You cannot 'steal back' what was stolen without becoming a thief yourself.
Theft implies ownership. Stolen goods are not owned by the thief. Therefore, I would not call it being a thief yourself to simply reclaim them.
Likes ^
Of all the argument here, that one is the simplest, clearest and hits the nail right on the head

Cersei Lannister wrote:Fine, fine. Emotional arguments, but why not. I understand where you are coming from.![]()
![[050.gif] :smt050](./images/smilies/050.gif)



Rabbid Thom wrote:but Roket the fact stays you not taking from the scammer and giving it back to the scammed
other wise you'd have sold it back to him for the $16
in my eyes the account was Fenrirs who only scammed VK
(hellsing can just shut up, i didn't get my secret santa gifts 2 years running but gave out so does that mean those who were surposed to give to me were scammers?)
VK paid for an account but got scammed therefore the only account you have in possesion that was fenrirs must be the account that is owed to VK regardless of what you think it's worth
Fenrir~ wrote:only guy i scammed was vintage viking that was 80 trills


rocket wrote:First let me explain this is a "stolen" account from a scammer, all procedes will go to those who have been scammed that come forward, this auction will last for 2weeks at which time I will call a close and the highest bidder gets it remember this is for resources only, anything I recieve extra for account will go back to Fenrir
Second thought maybe extras go to charity not sure yet but it is a possibilty, if that is the case reciept will be provided
Main
Red title
TUK
438mill army no merc
200mill can be untrained
ms 1,3 trill with fleets
35/34
300k raw 700k total with no officers
300 days MPDSD
Ascended all stats at least 700

xdaku wrote:play dead, works for me
she goes to call the ambulance, jump out the window and run for it
xdaku wrote:though I heard he was talking **Filtered** about you the other day.... I believe he was probably just taking a **Filtered** an people mistook the sounds for his voice
Xdaku wrote:yea people like brothers don't shower they go to car washes a proper "wash"
dark hero wrote:yeh **Filtered** that
that is money I would rather spend on cheap chinese **Filtered**
and drugs...
both at the same time

