^_^

Forum for all general ingame discussion.
Post Reply
RepliMagni
Forum Addict
Posts: 4158
Joined: Wed Apr 20, 2005 9:29 am
Alliance: Loner :P
Race: NanoTiMaster
ID: 1908448

Re: What is wrong with the game.

Gandy 181 wrote:Honestly repli what I see happening is one person buys say 41 then anouther does just cause the other has it ad then a few more do it's a man thing honestly I am better than u loool

Now to solve that would be a really gd fact as I can actually see someone buying 42 soon just to show off



But if you reduce the differentials it becomes just that - a prestige thing, but less practically useful ingame. What's the current boost per covert lvl? A doubling every two lvls? Make it a doubling every four lvls. Thus the difference between a c.38 and your c.42 person isn't as detrimental to the game BUT it still gives the bigger guys something to compete with each other on....
Image
User avatar
Field Marshall
Forum Zombie
Posts: 6112
Joined: Tue Sep 13, 2005 10:30 pm

Re: What is wrong with the game.

Gandy 181 wrote:Fm I have to say gd post although I have do e when I needed to get where my account is and fm u knw how I did it

But I agree with more a less all of it, as the reason why new players **Filtered** off so quick is that it will take them two yrs to even try get a decent account and that's after they been massed and ridiculed


My account is where it is because of some stupid rich Australian who contributed over $3,000 to my account. I was fortunate. You did some great trading, sure.

Point is, neither of us would be ridiculously bulked if both of those examples were not allowed!

RepliMagni wrote:What do you cap at then? People have already gone to c41? 2mil raw UP? What n00b can catch that or compete with that player in the next couple of years?

Cap at something more realistic? 39/39, 1mil raw up, etc. But what do these players do with excess naq/uu? I'm genuinely curious - because if they have no place to invest it, the only other option is conspicuous consumption, which in this game involves either selling it or warring - both of which fuel the problem of player retention.

I see no problem with continuously progressing the frontier - but the frontier should never be so far distant that the game becomes uncompetitive for newer players. I'm personally against creating ceilings - just not convinced there is then an incentive for long-term players to keep evolving their accounts...


Bring it back, like I said, I would rather take a hit to my account then see the gap and goalposts get even harder. With excess naq/uu, they fight, I don't know. I don't have the answer, all I know is it's ridiculously hard to catch up...6 years to 6 months is a big difference.

The incentive for me was always being more and more efficent, far less losses to kills. I wanted to be the best and I wanted to be greater than anyone here. I achieved some great things - would I have been as successful without external factors? I don't know, my knowledge is great but a whole variety of things could have changed this! I've reached that point, i'm bored of it, same faces. I have no challenge or commitment anymore to the game. The only thing, that would make me comeback is a membership of a couple of thousand and an active community, which is not policed by a bunch a bigots. How is this going to happen? Taking control of ones game and ironing out the things, Admin tried with Newgrounds, the only people on that, is old players from gatewars..

Gandy 181 wrote:Honestly repli what I see happening is one person buys say 41 then anouther does just cause the other has it ad then a few more do it's a man thing honestly I am better than u loool

Now to solve that would be a really gd fact as I can actually see someone buying 42 soon just to show off


Too late from what I've heard...
Sol wrote:
Field Marshall wrote:
Sol wrote:It's not going to destroy your life :P
Really?

I think this is sig worthy in fact.
:o my first sigging. I sigged you too. <3
High Empty wrote:however people shouldn't have lvl 33 and 200mil spies and try to be in the top 10, it's unhealthy.
Gandy 181
Forum Expert
Posts: 1025
Joined: Tue Jan 01, 2008 12:58 pm
Race: System Lord
ID: 44650
Location: Round the corner

Re: What is wrong with the game.

How about a shake up the forum as I was looking through admins and mods and getting messages back like a week later from
Some of them

It's only admin that can do that right ?
Image
Image
Empy
Derper
Posts: 7215
Joined: Sat Jun 07, 2008 7:02 pm
Race: Eldar
Location: The other side of the fence

Re: What is wrong with the game.

Field Marshall wrote:4) Forums - Controlled by a group of stuck up individuals who lack skill ingame, have no sort of connection with the overall game other than the immediate people around them. Moderators are elected due to their personal friendships with the Admins. Many moderators have gone inactive since their voting in. Forums are complete and utter rubbish now, only good for trolling and arguing. Most trades and communications are done through MSN. Infact, this is the same as IRC.
What? lol
Image

Image[url=steam://friends/add/76561198036220818]Image[/url]
Spoiler
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
RepliMagni
Forum Addict
Posts: 4158
Joined: Wed Apr 20, 2005 9:29 am
Alliance: Loner :P
Race: NanoTiMaster
ID: 1908448

Re: What is wrong with the game.

Gandy 181 wrote:How about a shake up the forum as I was looking through admins and mods and getting messages back like a week later from
Some of them

It's only admin that can do that right ?


Not gonna happen - there have been many complaints/controversies over the years.

Besides, people often complain that current players aren't mods. Seriously? Can you imagine if a lot of OE or DDE were admins/mods at the moment? Would be bedlam....
Image
User avatar
xDaku
Forum Addict
Posts: 3025
Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2010 1:10 pm
Alliance: Forgotten Serenity - leader
ID: 27858

Re: What is wrong with the game.

I :smt060 you.
Image
Image
Spoiler
Easy^ wrote: I am sorry if my shadow is too awesome for you to stand in.
E
MEZZANINE wrote:
Oooo I like higher math

E=Mc2*SGW = ( ( U = A*S*S ) + ( JT + $$$ + E*G*O ) ) + ( FS = AWESOME + Infinity ). Therefor FS -> DDE :D
Yyith wrote:Yyith says:
thats why women have small feet
get closer to the sink
Spoiler
Mezzanine wrote:Picture a hot summers day, sitting on the grass ( maybe smoking it too lol ), sun shining, cool breeze, cold beer, beautiful lady, perfect Serenity

Now picture your worst nightmare, the grass turned into trenches of mud, rain drenching you, ice winds, down to rations, surrounded by death and destruction

Turning your dreams into nightmares is what we do, heed this warning and pass it on, else you will forget your serenity forever

Blood in 2012 - Updated 1st Sep, 2012:
Spoiler
Attack Soldiers killed: 32,934,122
Defence Soldiers killed: 17,810,494
Attack Supers killed: 777,708,800
Defence Supers killed: 1,004,092,379
Spy Killers killed: 301,726,911
Spies Killed: 1,223,520,310
Total: 3,357,793,016

Raiders lost: 5,324,560
Guards lost: 14,223,773
Super Soldiers lost: 907,918,161
Super Guards lost: 654,870,558
Undercover Agents lost: 411,831,764
Assassin lost: 269,766,078
Total: 2,263,934,894
User avatar
Drought
Forum Expert
Posts: 1142
Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2011 11:52 am
ID: 0
Location: dde

Re: What is wrong with the game.

With them levels and all .. instead of caps ...

how about something as simple as a barriers between levels .... for instance a 5 levels covert difference barrier 'above' level 30.

effectively meaning, your highest level (AC or C) determines your max, if you have max level 40 ... the smallest level you could hit to sab or ac would be a level 35. But you could hit and mass old school-ish on lower ones.

smaller example: level 36 would only be able to sab or ac people with a max level of 31 or up.
Image
a very bad hairdo
Image
User avatar
jedi~tank
Forum Zombie
Posts: 9936
Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 12:43 pm
ID: 0
Location: Creepin in the back door

Re: What is wrong with the game.

When I suggested a cap over a year ago I was willing to take a hit on my account dropping, I still am. Reducing to max 39/39 would be good, reducing the up to mil max, and therefore forcing planet investment for more, capping ms capacities as well, 750k for each slot? Capping some ascended even, and further enhancing the quest for deities and other achievements..a reduction on accounts and then a cap would be a good thing. And what DD said in conjunction with the cap.

In order to level the playing field..or another way to say it, make sure everyone can play is to implement a scenario based on DD post.
Last edited by jedi~tank on Thu Aug 02, 2012 8:05 am, edited 1 time in total.
Image

Image

Image

"What I want to see is a tight knit group not a collection of people pulling in different directions"
Deni
RepliMagni
Forum Addict
Posts: 4158
Joined: Wed Apr 20, 2005 9:29 am
Alliance: Loner :P
Race: NanoTiMaster
ID: 1908448

Re: What is wrong with the game.

Duck Dodgers wrote:With them levels and all .. instead of caps ...

how about something as simple as a barriers between levels .... for instance a 5 levels covert difference barrier 'above' level 30.

effectively meaning, your highest level (AC or C) determines your max, if you have max level 40 ... the smallest level you could hit to sab or ac would be a level 35. But you could hit and mass old school-ish on lower ones.

smaller example: level 36 would only be able to sab or ac people with a max level of 31 or up.


Definitely NOT! Would mean a c.35 could mass a c.41 without being worried about being sabbed!

Still think the best way is to reduce the differentials between lvls...
Image
User avatar
Drought
Forum Expert
Posts: 1142
Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2011 11:52 am
ID: 0
Location: dde

Re: What is wrong with the game.

RepliMagni wrote:
Duck Dodgers wrote:With them levels and all .. instead of caps ...

how about something as simple as a barriers between levels .... for instance a 5 levels covert difference barrier 'above' level 30.

effectively meaning, your highest level (AC or C) determines your max, if you have max level 40 ... the smallest level you could hit to sab or ac would be a level 35. But you could hit and mass old school-ish on lower ones.

smaller example: level 36 would only be able to sab or ac people with a max level of 31 or up.


Definitely NOT! Would mean a c.35 could mass a c.41 without being worried about being sabbed!
..


Yes .... that was the intention of the suggestion ...

The idea is that the far higher level would be unable to sab or AC through someones defense with a severly smaller level .. he would effectively need to apply old school massing to beat him or her back. Assuming the higher level likely also has a bigger MS, he already has a better advantage ;)
Image
a very bad hairdo
Image
User avatar
Field Marshall
Forum Zombie
Posts: 6112
Joined: Tue Sep 13, 2005 10:30 pm

Re: What is wrong with the game.

Empy wrote:
Field Marshall wrote:4) Forums - Controlled by a group of stuck up individuals who lack skill ingame, have no sort of connection with the overall game other than the immediate people around them. Moderators are elected due to their personal friendships with the Admins. Many moderators have gone inactive since their voting in. Forums are complete and utter rubbish now, only good for trolling and arguing. Most trades and communications are done through MSN. Infact, this is the same as IRC.
What? lol


My opinion Empy, you won't change it and a lot of other people feel the same. There are a couple of people that I hold in high esteem, you are one of them, DD is another, Haz is great, lone dragon, Juliette, Psycho...don't get me wrong, I do appreciate it the work you put in. However, the whole thing is a load of beaucratic **Filtered**! Sure, I may be a sore loser in saying this, but choosing Seph over me as mod? Reasoning? I don't need any, other than people hate the way I do things at time, regardless of my ability to communicate and follow rules. Look at this thread, here's an example of my work. The recently elected mods have dissapeared. I won't justify my answer any futher, right or wrong. This is how it feels.
Sol wrote:
Field Marshall wrote:
Sol wrote:It's not going to destroy your life :P
Really?

I think this is sig worthy in fact.
:o my first sigging. I sigged you too. <3
High Empty wrote:however people shouldn't have lvl 33 and 200mil spies and try to be in the top 10, it's unhealthy.
RepliMagni
Forum Addict
Posts: 4158
Joined: Wed Apr 20, 2005 9:29 am
Alliance: Loner :P
Race: NanoTiMaster
ID: 1908448

Re: What is wrong with the game.

Duck Dodgers wrote:
RepliMagni wrote:
Duck Dodgers wrote:With them levels and all .. instead of caps ...

how about something as simple as a barriers between levels .... for instance a 5 levels covert difference barrier 'above' level 30.

effectively meaning, your highest level (AC or C) determines your max, if you have max level 40 ... the smallest level you could hit to sab or ac would be a level 35. But you could hit and mass old school-ish on lower ones.

smaller example: level 36 would only be able to sab or ac people with a max level of 31 or up.


Definitely NOT! Would mean a c.35 could mass a c.41 without being worried about being sabbed!
..


Yes .... that was the intention of the suggestion ...

The idea is that the far higher level would be unable to sab or AC through someones defense with a severly smaller level .. he would effectively need to apply old school massing to beat him or her back. Assuming the higher level likely also has a bigger MS, he already has a better advantage ;)


Then to mass a c.41 with a 100tril def all I need is a c.35 with 0 def and 100tril strike and 0 covert - and he can do absolutely nothing to defend against me?! Nope...
Image
User avatar
jedi~tank
Forum Zombie
Posts: 9936
Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 12:43 pm
ID: 0
Location: Creepin in the back door

Re: What is wrong with the game.

Further, the focus needs to be on new players, and getting new players, and getting them to stay...what happens in wars is the same thing that has always happened, the newer, smaller, less active get beat on from both sides, get sat on, can't hardly play, get discouraged and quit..and the we come back around and worry and whine about losing more players bla bla bla bla **Filtered** bla...we ought to just suck it up and make some moves..


Cap this **Filtered**
Ban account trading
Ban account swapping
Ban multiple accounts but I do think atleast 2 per ip be allowed for family members
Somehow kill the use of proxy

And get this **Filtered** str8 and stop talking about it over and over and over again.
Image

Image

Image

"What I want to see is a tight knit group not a collection of people pulling in different directions"
Deni
User avatar
Drought
Forum Expert
Posts: 1142
Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2011 11:52 am
ID: 0
Location: dde

Re: What is wrong with the game.

RepliMagni wrote:Then to mass a c.41 with a 100tril def all I need is a c.35 with 0 def and 100tril strike and 0 covert - and he can do absolutely nothing to defend against me?! Nope...



Fair point, and good to point out .... but ... wouldnt catching that persons repair naq become a singe ? and getting team mates with lower levels to ac and sab as easy as can be ? this would force a variety in your alliance members or group too :) I would imagine ascenders getting a more important role there too ;)

Try throwing in solutions too ;) shooting problems is not bad
Image
a very bad hairdo
Image
User avatar
Legendary Apophis
Forum History
Posts: 13681
Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2005 12:54 pm
Alliance: Generations
Race: System Lord
ID: 7889
Alternate name(s): Apophis the Great
Location: Ha'TaK

Re: What is wrong with the game.

RepliMagni wrote:What do you cap at then? People have already gone to c41? 2mil raw UP? What n00b can catch that or compete with that player in the next couple of years?

Cap at something more realistic? 39/39, 1mil raw up, etc. But what do these players do with excess naq/uu? I'm genuinely curious - because if they have no place to invest it, the only other option is conspicuous consumption, which in this game involves either selling it or warring - both of which fuel the problem of player retention.

I see no problem with continuously progressing the frontier - but the frontier should never be so far distant that the game becomes uncompetitive for newer players. I'm personally against creating ceilings - just not convinced there is then an incentive for long-term players to keep evolving their accounts...

How about converting the naq "disappeared" from a cap at 39/39 to APP for ascended accounts? Naq "lost" due to cap converted to APP and sent to ascended account even if person is TUK just so they can boost their ascended account as they after all had to spend that naq?
Other ideas: to get it converted to a big big amount of Merlins; to be able to hold two triple planet/buy one more dual from BM than "normal" accounts; get for once the opportunity to have ability to trade in the ingame market for bigger amounts (not limited to 6 trades/week) for a set amount of times/weeks...
They could also be able to spend it on planets stats, mothership, platforms.
Last edited by Legendary Apophis on Thu Aug 02, 2012 8:27 am, edited 1 time in total.
Image
Image
Spoiler

Incarnate - LG - LG1 - LG2 - LG3 - LG4 - AG - EAG ~ AGoL - Completed
Spoiler
<Dmonix> Damnit Jim how come every conversation with you always ends up discussing something deep and meaningful?
<Dmonix> We always end up discussing male/female differences or politics or football
<Dmonix> All the really important issues in life
Post Reply

Return to “StarGateWars General”