The ban took a while in coming. You had your 2 weeks to rage and vent, and you continued well beyond it. You burned yourself.George Hazard wrote:as for you poppet.Juliette wrote:Your amusing dislike for Jason does not make him wrong.
I am fully aware that Jason had you and Z in a private channel talking about all of this literally at the same time he and I were talking on IRC and he decided to ban me.
You and Earendil actively tried to provoke Jason into taking action by attempting to shut him out, by redefining your role as admins.. indeed, by rewriting the entire concept of adminship - a thread I believe you missed in your leak-forum?George Hazard wrote:Dislike has nothing to do with anything. He made stupid decisions in the heat of the moment, whilst putzing around with one of the people the issue was about instead of maintaining impartiality as THE LEADER.
Psht. Hardly realistic. Zeratul got torched in conversations as well. Less in public, fair enough. I see the point you are trying to make.George Hazard wrote:Jason has always played favorites, he does it here and he does it in-game.
And you know what, its impossible for people to not have a favorite. Its simply the way it is, every one has a favorite. Every parent a favorite child, every person a favorite friend. You can deny it all you want but deep down its the truth.
My beef with Jason is his inability to make decisions against his friends.
That is why Z got away with what he did. Daddy always stepped in to make it go away.
Fair enough.George Hazard wrote:It was one of the last things I said to jason, that he needed to finally get off his ass and make a god damned decision because this "lets ignore it and hope it goes away" **Filtered** of his has never once worked. I told him I didn't care if it ended well or not for me, so long as he finally grew a pair and did something.
I have seen far lesser actions punished more severely than stuff Jason has let his friends get away with over the year (not just Z) and I have seen him go to great lengths to do things for friends just the same.
Mr. Almighty needs to start being impartial. Friends is one thing, but when you are the boss it needs to be the primary thought process.
Nah, you selected a few threads that would work to your advantage in trying to create a public outrage, ignored countless others.. Pick and choose, is what you did.George Hazard wrote:Wrong.Juliette wrote:[spoiler]Ah, but the outside observers in such situations are about as reliable an observer as an Israeli in an Iranian nuclear testing facility.(That is, they see what they want to see; which is what everyone hopes they will not see.)
You are looking in on processes of which you only see marginal aspects, and you base your dislike of their work ethics on that minimal reliable information you get; some (worthless bits) of which is leaked intelligence, other bits are conjecture by parties of unequal understanding..
All in all, it is your opinion, and you have every right to have it. We will just agree to disagree on the matter, trivial as it is.[/spoiler]
The information that has been "leaked" is not minimal. Nor is it in any way marginal.
That is ALL that went on. You know it too, so you can take your defense tactic and try another one.
Hahaha! Nice try. They do still exist. *grin* They are just .. less lengthy. So your own posts (and the ones by my old friend Earendil) are gone. The rest still remains. Hole-y threads, but they do still exist.George Hazard wrote:And lets play semantics here, its not leaked. Those threads no longer exist.
Yeah, well. We agreed on that deleting thing before. It was a bit clumsy (understandably clumsy though) and way too much at once (less understandable).
Fair point. A little harsh, but I see where you are coming from.xDaku wrote:Not necessarily. A consumer uses an apple product, finds an inconsistency, complains to Apple about it just to have their access to this product shut down.
Work ethic is always judged by outsiders/consumers. Jason sucks at keeping his user base happy. Jason sucks at setting a fair system over an easy system. This is all stuff that's been proven time and time again.
His excuse before used to be "too much work irl/family". Failure to balance it out = poor work ethic. His knee jerk failure of a reaction in deleting off 3 users' years of dedication to this forum was a crap decision directly based off his lack of good work ethics.
George Hazard wrote:Quite honestly, deleting us isn't the issue. Or at least it shouldn't be.
Nothing that was destroyed cannot be rebuilt. It is a matter of whether it should be restored, or not.George Hazard wrote: The issue was the careless destruction of what the majority of those posts were, not who made them.
I know for a fact only 5k of mine were in the temple... assume 5-8k were spam elsewhere and you have about 12k non-useless posts now missing just from me alone.
But again.. burning the Library of Alexandria was a shame. This is somewhat comparable within the context of this forum.




