Would it be possible for trades done on the market ie naq for turns to be taken directly from stronghold?
and possibly if for uu to come straight from mines if trading that?
ofc if you don't have the funds in your account, trade can't take place so no neg amounts.
Auto bank withdrawls on market
- ~nyx~
- Forum Expert
- Posts: 1041
- Joined: Sat Feb 27, 2016 9:05 pm
- Alternate name(s): CleoCatra, Temptress, Femme Fatale, Nyx, Cleo
Auto bank withdrawls on market
“There are two ways to be fooled. One is to believe what isn't true;
the other is to refuse to believe what is true.”
― Søren Kierkegaard
the other is to refuse to believe what is true.”
― Søren Kierkegaard
No one is more hated, than they that speak the truth ~Plato
SGW player since 11 Oct 2005 memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=5707
- Duderanch
- Internet Hero
- Posts: 6086
- Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 10:24 am
- Alliance: MaYHeM
- Race: Ancient
- ID: 58491
Re: Auto bank withdrawls on market
-_- no.
The trade broker reports trade from Surtr to *Teesdale_ of 100,000,000 Naq for 33,000,000,000,000 Naq is complete.
Barbara! says: haha ok you can have a piece of my soul for 50bil naq
Skype= dan_P_@msn.com
Barbara! says: haha ok you can have a piece of my soul for 50bil naq
Skype= dan_P_@msn.com
Teesdale
[21:06:02] Jake/Tees: does black market work in there?
[21:06:18] robert: nah
[21:06:24] robert: uu go in miners
[21:06:24] Duderanch: Yeah Ben said did but can't untrin miners so no point
[21:06:37] Jake/Tees: sweet, so methlad not be able to fight back
[21:06:46] Jake/Tees: EADC
[21:06:18] robert: nah
[21:06:24] robert: uu go in miners
[21:06:24] Duderanch: Yeah Ben said did but can't untrin miners so no point
[21:06:37] Jake/Tees: sweet, so methlad not be able to fight back
[21:06:46] Jake/Tees: EADC
Naq sold in 2017 - 21q
- harchester
- Forum History
- Posts: 10456
- Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:31 am
- Alliance: Ricos Roughnecks
- Location: Scotland
Re: Auto bank withdrawls on market
Why? It would be a useful update...Duderanch wrote:-_- no.
Even if you hear a bad story about me, Understand that there was a time I was good to those people to, But they won’t tell you that...
-
- Forum Grunt
- Posts: 92
- Joined: Sun Sep 13, 2015 10:43 am
- ID: 0
Re: Auto bank withdrawls on market
Takes the fear factor away bud. No ppts left you need to take 20 trill out to pay for something and bam someone farms you for it..... So no I agree with duder it would be taking more off the risk factor out (you know you always want to see that one player with a 1 trill def pulling 100 trill out to pay for something dont you Harchy......
- Duderanch
- Internet Hero
- Posts: 6086
- Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 10:24 am
- Alliance: MaYHeM
- Race: Ancient
- ID: 58491
Re: Auto bank withdrawls on market
^ What he said.
The whole point is the element of risk, someone can catch you taking naq out or untraining for a trade.
The whole point is the element of risk, someone can catch you taking naq out or untraining for a trade.
The trade broker reports trade from Surtr to *Teesdale_ of 100,000,000 Naq for 33,000,000,000,000 Naq is complete.
Barbara! says: haha ok you can have a piece of my soul for 50bil naq
Skype= dan_P_@msn.com
Barbara! says: haha ok you can have a piece of my soul for 50bil naq
Skype= dan_P_@msn.com
Teesdale
[21:06:02] Jake/Tees: does black market work in there?
[21:06:18] robert: nah
[21:06:24] robert: uu go in miners
[21:06:24] Duderanch: Yeah Ben said did but can't untrin miners so no point
[21:06:37] Jake/Tees: sweet, so methlad not be able to fight back
[21:06:46] Jake/Tees: EADC
[21:06:18] robert: nah
[21:06:24] robert: uu go in miners
[21:06:24] Duderanch: Yeah Ben said did but can't untrin miners so no point
[21:06:37] Jake/Tees: sweet, so methlad not be able to fight back
[21:06:46] Jake/Tees: EADC
Naq sold in 2017 - 21q
-
- The Ablest Man
- Posts: 1758
- Joined: Thu Jun 18, 2009 1:07 pm
- Alliance: Multiverse
- Race: Clockwork Admin
- ID: 1940718
Re: Auto bank withdrawls on market
It's been a while since this last came up, you can find one of the old threads HERE. The idea was rejected before for the reasons Vormulac highlighted above. I also believe the idea was discussed during one of the IRC admin meetings a few years ago, with the same result.