Could a mod define SGW General ?

Tok`ra · Sat Apr 28, 2007 7:32 am

Since ingame based topics get moved, it would be nice to have guidelines so we know what is valid, as just talking about the game obviusly is not enough.

LBWMTE- D4rk S1de · Sat Apr 28, 2007 7:33 am

LMAO

You know what I'm thinking

This shouldn't be here, it should be in forum specific issues board

Tok`ra · Sat Apr 28, 2007 7:35 am

Or better yet, a stickey in this section so we know what is 'valid'.

Of course valid changes a lot.

Heres a PM I got from geisha about one SGW thread that was moved to the temple when I PMd politley asking for it to be moved back.

Excuse the language, but as it IS what a MOD sent via PM I assume its allowed.

What I sent you via pm was sent via PM for a reason and not posted in public.

There ya go geisha, better colors

geisha · Sat Apr 28, 2007 7:39 am

What purpose does this serve? It's people like you ruining the community. Stirring up crap all the time, posting propaganda, making up stuff... and then complain about the mods over and over again.

Is that really necessary?

I think not.

Lord Dougy · Sat Apr 28, 2007 7:41 am

im just waiting for a day when there isnt a tokra started topic..... one can dream... :smt015

~Phoenix~ · Sat Apr 28, 2007 7:42 am

I think it has a point. Nobody really knows what to put here so they just post crap.

Tok`ra · Sat Apr 28, 2007 7:43 am

Hardly, Im asking a valid questionm which you as a section mod should be capable of answering, not cursing at a user politley askign a question via PM.

And since YOUR respots is apparently not allwed to be psoted, here is what I sent incase anyone doubts I sent a polite PM.

geisha wrote:
Tok`ra wrote:Can you move that thread back, valid GENERAL SGW thread.
Edited out since geisha doesnt want tobe seen cursing at a user in public it seems.

EDIT: Exactly pheonix.

StarGateWars General
Forum for all general ingame discussion.

Thats what it says now.

One almost thinks it should read

StarGateWars General
Forum for all general ingame discussion that is popular

The fact of the matter is, at the bare minimum, general should be for ANYTHING INGAME not suitable for Gal Col.

geisha · Sat Apr 28, 2007 7:53 am

Tok`ra wrote:The fact of the matter is, at the bare minimum, general should be for ANYTHING INGAME not suitable for Gal Col.

Basically yes. But what's the point in opening new threads about any CoP / CIA issue every 30 minutes? What's the point in making pointless polls about who you think CIA will mass next? Propaganda?

Seriously, what you want isn't discuss ingame things, what you want is to cause more trouble and make sure the CoP and CIA conflict never ends.

I think this is stupid and every new topic started about CIA/COP will only lead to more flaming and won't serve any purpose at all.

Tok`ra · Sat Apr 28, 2007 7:55 am

geisha wrote:
Tok`ra wrote:The fact of the matter is, at the bare minimum, general should be for ANYTHING INGAME not suitable for Gal Col.

Basically yes. But what's the point in opening new threads about any CoP / CIA issue every 30 minutes? What's the point in making pointless polls about who you think CIA will mass next? Propaganda?

Seriously, what you want isn't discuss ingame things, what you want is to cause more trouble and make sure the CoP and CIA conflict never ends.

I think this is stupid and every new topic started about CIA/COP will only lead to more flaming and won't serve any purpose at all.

So basicly any thread geisha thinks is stupid is not SGW general suitible; WE HAVE OUR ANSWER PEOPLE!

~Phoenix~ · Sat Apr 28, 2007 7:55 am

geisha wrote:
Tok`ra wrote:The fact of the matter is, at the bare minimum, general should be for ANYTHING INGAME not suitable for Gal Col.

Basically yes. But what's the point in opening new threads about any CoP / CIA issue every 30 minutes? What's the point in making pointless polls about who you think CIA will mass next? Propaganda?

Seriously, what you want isn't discuss ingame things, what you want is to cause more trouble and make sure the CoP and CIA conflict never ends.

I think this is stupid and every new topic started about CIA/COP will only lead to more flaming and won't serve any purpose at all.

It isnt only them though, I didnt see any mention of cop/cia threads in this topic until then.

geisha · Sat Apr 28, 2007 7:57 am

~Phoenix~ wrote:
It isnt only them though, I didnt see any mention of cop/cia threads in this topic until then.

The reason Tok'ra started this thread was because I have moved another Anti-CIA propaganda thread to the temple of spam.

I'm just sick of it.

Tok`ra · Sat Apr 28, 2007 7:58 am

~Phoenix~ wrote:
geisha wrote:
Tok`ra wrote:The fact of the matter is, at the bare minimum, general should be for ANYTHING INGAME not suitable for Gal Col.

Basically yes. But what's the point in opening new threads about any CoP / CIA issue every 30 minutes? What's the point in making pointless polls about who you think CIA will mass next? Propaganda?

Seriously, what you want isn't discuss ingame things, what you want is to cause more trouble and make sure the CoP and CIA conflict never ends.

I think this is stupid and every new topic started about CIA/COP will only lead to more flaming and won't serve any purpose at all.

It isnt only them though, I didnt see any mention of cop/cia threads in this topic until then.

Indeed. Hoisted on your own petard.

EDIT

geisha wrote:
~Phoenix~ wrote:
It isnt only them though, I didnt see any mention of cop/cia threads in this topic until then.

The reason Tok'ra started this thread was because I have moved another Anti-CIA propaganda thread to the temple of spam.

I'm just sick of it.

So I have a poll that boils down to who will get massed (and thus join the war next) in SGW general, and thats spam ?

Ok, so are questions about ingame to be referred to the temple now geisha ?

~Phoenix~ · Sat Apr 28, 2007 8:00 am

geisha wrote:
~Phoenix~ wrote:
It isnt only them though, I didnt see any mention of cop/cia threads in this topic until then.

The reason Tok'ra started this thread was because I have moved another Anti-CIA propaganda thread to the temple of spam.

I'm just sick of it.

Well then im carrying on this topic for non cia/cop crap

Flavar · Sat Apr 28, 2007 8:08 am

1. First i agree that we need a definition.
2. Second i am stil in the development defintion of what is allowed here from me.
3. There are other mods that have more to say.
---> its a valid question and as mod and as player i would welcome a clearer definition

---> i will post in the mod forum about it

Tok`ra · Sat Apr 28, 2007 8:11 am

Flavar wrote:1. First i agree that we need a definition.
2. Second i am stil in the development defintion of what is allowed here from me.
3. There are other mods that have more to say.
---> its a valid question and as mod and as player i would welcome a clearer definition

---> i will post in the mod forum about it

And tell me Flavar, if a user posts what he belives a valid thread for general, a mod moves it, user sends a polite PM, and the mod responds with cursing, is that appropiate at all ?

I can foward you the PM if you want.

Could a mod define SGW General ?

Could a mod define SGW General ?

Login