Re: Counting to 1,000,000
Posted: Thu Jan 27, 2011 1:14 pm
10443
StarGateWars Forums
These are the forums for the GateWa.rs family of text-based space-centred PBBGs
https://talk.gatewa.rs/
Counting to 1,000,000
Page 668 of 1244
10444
Posted: Thu Jan 27, 2011 1:14 pm
really.
Re: Counting to 1,000,000
Posted: Thu Jan 27, 2011 1:15 pm
despite you being wrong?
Re: Counting to 1,000,000
Posted: Thu Jan 27, 2011 1:16 pm
despite you being wrong, yes...
Re: Counting to 1,000,000
Posted: Thu Jan 27, 2011 1:17 pm
10447
Re: Counting to 1,000,000
Posted: Thu Jan 27, 2011 1:18 pm
10448Re: Counting to 1,000,000
Posted: Thu Jan 27, 2011 1:20 pm
Zeratul wrote:despite you being wrong, yes...
Zeratul wrote:that would be a quite correct numerical-mathematical inequality...
*chuckles*
Re: Counting to 1,000,000
Posted: Thu Jan 27, 2011 1:20 pm
10449
Re: Counting to 1,000,000
Posted: Thu Jan 27, 2011 1:22 pm
10450
Re: Counting to 1,000,000
Posted: Thu Jan 27, 2011 1:27 pm
Londo Mollari wrote:Zeratul wrote:despite you being wrong, yes...Zeratul wrote:that would be a quite correct numerical-mathematical inequality...
*chuckles*
how so.. pi is a small number but with infinate decimal points.. but even the number 3.15 beats it... ergo infinity being even larger stll is definatley greater....
Re: Counting to 1,000,000
Posted: Thu Jan 27, 2011 1:28 pm
the two letters "p" and "i" put together, do mean a numerical value, as do the letters making up "infinity". The exact value cannot be put into numbers.
letters pwn numerals
Posted: Thu Jan 27, 2011 1:30 pm
yes but pi still has a value less than four does it not?
Re: Counting to 1,000,000
Posted: Thu Jan 27, 2011 1:35 pm
pi is acceptable, its merely the english spelling of π which is a real number approx 3.14
∞ however, is a mathematical concept, the ∞ symbol is assumed to denote that the number is infinitely large, but it really just means that it is undefined
∞ therefore, is not a number
thus the inequality is not a numerical inequality
=> you fail
=> i win
=)
∞ however, is a mathematical concept, the ∞ symbol is assumed to denote that the number is infinitely large, but it really just means that it is undefined
∞ therefore, is not a number
thus the inequality is not a numerical inequality
=> you fail
=> i win
=)
Re: Counting to 1,000,000
Posted: Thu Jan 27, 2011 1:41 pm
hence the "numerical-mathematical" and not "numerical"
and yes, femme... pi is less than four...
and yes, femme... pi is less than four...
Re: Counting to 1,000,000
Posted: Thu Jan 27, 2011 1:45 pm
Zeratul wrote:hence the "numerical-mathematical" and not "numerical"
and yes, femme... pi is less than four...
same thing
