StarGateWars Forums

blahh wrote:*looks at the avat.... witty can be easyly done if the company is right

Tyveris wrote:i think the problem is perception and presentation myself...

a lot of the people who seem to be educated are but mere blips on the radar not harming anyone but there to bolster others ME ratings.....

there are lots of accounts in the huge empires floating around the universe that would qualify for an 'education' under the conditions stated for a so called visit....

personally i really think it's 'im bored so ill mass' situation....its just wearing the guise of 'education' to support justification on massing away smaller peeps who 2 years ago would have been rather taken under the wing and shown the so called 'proper' way to play....

but how can u post your accomplishments on forums under the topic 'im bored so i massed a load of nubs' and expect not to get ridiculed by the rest of the SGW community

just my two cents (for what its worth)

Almost38 wrote:can we get a bannn masing sig???

Mordack wrote:

Almost38 wrote:can we get a bannn masing sig???

Why not a 'ban all forms of agression on this war game' signature?

I think the name itself was an arbitrary " You sound cool, but don't have a hidden meaning. " Sort of deal? The original target left I believe 30mil UU out, so they school'd him. Kicked his behind. AKA. Educated.

I think that's the origin of the name.

~HellFIre

weilandsmith wrote:This is not about the massing.

I'd like to give credit where it is due.

To antz and nightmare for TELLING me that having so many defense supers is a disadvantage. I have learned my lesson and have stopped training defense supers. I use mercs for them instead. I appreciate them TELLING me.

I've already said my piece about what i think of the methods of the educators. As Severian said, it's all about semantics. I'm too tired to repeat them. This is not about the massing. Its about the method that the educators use to impart their knowledge.

If the purpose of educators is to educate and help, then they could post a sticky about what they think is good and what they think is bad. They have the experience after all to do this. In this respect, I thank the educators for making SGW players more aware of excellent SGW game strategies.

madcat wrote:[spoiler]orrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr .............

you could carry on ur way of playing ........

and we could carry on with ours ........

wouldnt that just be easier

fact is, having someone to 'hate' is what strives ppl to succeed in this game!! when i first started, it was Omega and the GA, i grew and grew fast, so that i wouldnt have to be 'bullied' by these ppl with a grip on the server,

once i was at a point my account was worth something, Omega massed me and my alliance (~Wolfpack~ on Bloody Sunday), so we hit back (and .... did a damn fine job even being offered to merge into GA alliances).

after this, i talked with members of the GA and befriended quite a lot of them. I found that i didnt really 'hate' these ppl, i was simply jealous of them in the beginning, as they were far better than i.

this is exactly the same thing. U guys whine on about us educators (as everyone did with the GA) but the way i see it ....

by giving someone to 'hate'
we provide someone ppl strive to beat,

we're keeping the game alive by making some of those who get hit, build and build, till they can fight back! hence creating more good players in the game, and not just those who buy a crapload of res with $$ for a big army.

u wont understand this unless u've been in the same boat before ....... but honestly and whole heartedly, thats why i'm an educator and i DO believe in it [/spoiler]