Page 8 of 10

Re: lord al vs Knight Arthur

Posted: Sun Nov 01, 2009 7:57 am
by Rocky
merged from the other thread, please keep all war things related in here, there's no need for two seperate threads.

Re: lord al vs Knight Arthur

Posted: Sun Nov 01, 2009 7:59 am
by Captain Teague
ok thanks

Re: lord al vs Knight Arthur

Posted: Sun Nov 01, 2009 2:10 pm
by jedi~tank
Ummm this was supposed to start monday?

Re: lord al vs Knight Arthur

Posted: Sun Nov 01, 2009 2:11 pm
by jedi~tank
Jedi~Tank wrote:ALRIGHTY THEN..RULES OF ENGAGEMENT

Revision

No insults in the thread.

1- war lasts 1 week beginning Nov 2 2009 and will end Nov 9 2009
2- players must build and maintain 50b defense at log on- no hiding behind msn
3- if phased must reset nox/critical at the next turn change
4- NO Ascended attacks
5- NO Planets
6- Post your battles using the role play style

DDE and the W's of Briton expect both players to represent thier respective Alliances at the highest level in word and deed.

Re: lord al vs Knight Arthur

Posted: Sun Nov 01, 2009 2:28 pm
by Captain Teague
Jedi~Tank wrote:
Jedi~Tank wrote:ALRIGHTY THEN..RULES OF ENGAGEMENT

Revision

No insults in the thread.

1- war lasts 1 week beginning Nov 2 2009 and will end Nov 9 2009
2- players must build and maintain 50b defense at log on- no hiding behind msn
3- if phased must reset nox/critical at the next turn change
4- NO Ascended attacks
5- NO Planets
6- Post your battles using the role play style

DDE and the W's of Briton expect both players to represent thier respective Alliances at the highest level in word and deed.



ok the thing is since he was booted from doc the rules didnt apply to me the rules only apply if 2 alliances are involved but since its a noob a lonely one i thought it was time to do so and its been going on for 2 months and its more than just a vendetta.

Re: lord al vs Knight Arthur

Posted: Sun Nov 01, 2009 3:14 pm
by Brythalious
I would disagree mate, you did jump the gun. You may be one of mine but you did agree to the terms, just because the Alliances are either out of the picture or whatever you did agree to the rules.

Re: lord al vs Knight Arthur

Posted: Sun Nov 01, 2009 3:42 pm
by Captain Teague
well lord al just wanted to fight me he didnt post terms or nothing and because we both our in alliance you guys thought of the rules but since it has nothing to do wit you guys anymore let lord al come to me then hes the one who started this.


I stuck to my word when he said after he massed me dont contact me again so i did that 2 months later he said hello nooobbbbb on msn so basically he cant even follow his own rules but if he wants to come after me then do so but as far im conserned iv already won you have brought it on yourself my friend

Re: lord al vs Knight Arthur

Posted: Sun Nov 01, 2009 7:08 pm
by SystemJ1
Ive spoken to eomer/arthur, or what ever name he has chosen for the day, leader. What we decided is that a new fight will be properly faught starting on tuesday, seeing as eomer broke his word and massed him a day early and had the help of another WoB member. This detestable act is sad to see but will be resolved. New terms will be posted tomorrow.

Also this fight is to remain between al and eomer, no outside help will be allowed. Neither side will get help in rebuilding from being massed today.

Re: lord al vs Knight Arthur

Posted: Sun Nov 01, 2009 7:21 pm
by jedi~tank
wait. so there was help by others to mass a dde officer?

Re: lord al vs Knight Arthur

Posted: Mon Nov 02, 2009 8:25 am
by LORD AL
Jedi~Tank wrote:wait. so there was help by others to mass a dde officer?

yes i got massed lol

Nov 01, 2009 CaNsHoW CHIPOKOMON RULES lost 15 0 500 1,380,000,000 2,735,162,100

Nov 01, 2009 Erebuss 9,516,426,400 Naquadah stolen 15 5,371 3,169 56,095,200,000 1,095,844,104,393

Nov 01, 2009 King Éomer 2,559 untrained units kidnapped 15 3,732 3,120 49,913,399,290 196,550,986,105

As you can all see this was before the date of the battle, with help and took planets..lol
am yust wondering do you really thing you have won..lol
look. 1 sneaky gorila attack doenst win the war....

Re: lord al vs Knight Arthur

Posted: Mon Nov 02, 2009 9:26 am
by Captain Teague
Jedi~Tank wrote:wait. so there was help by others to mass a dde officer?


jedi tank you might find i massed him when he was kicked out of DoC so it isnt a war declaration





LORD AL wrote:


yes i got massed lol

Nov 01, 2009 CaNsHoW CHIPOKOMON RULES lost 15 0 500 1,380,000,000 2,735,162,100

Nov 01, 2009 Erebuss 9,516,426,400 Naquadah stolen 15 5,371 3,169 56,095,200,000 1,095,844,104,393

Nov 01, 2009 King Éomer 2,559 untrained units kidnapped 15 3,732 3,120 49,913,399,290 196,550,986,105

As you can all see this was before the date of the battle, with help and took planets..lol
am yust wondering do you really thing you have won..lol
look. 1 sneaky gorila attack doenst win the war....



and al i would of sat on you if your co didnt get involved and you wouldnt be able to attack or defend your self so yes i would of won

Re: lord al vs Knight Arthur

Posted: Mon Nov 02, 2009 9:43 am
by ~Destruction1~
King Eomer wrote:
Jedi~Tank wrote:wait. so there was help by others to mass a dde officer?


jedi tank you might find i massed him when he was kicked out of DoC so it isnt a war declaration


KA, just because he doesn't currently wear empire tags does not mean he stops being an officer of a DDE member. That is the point JT is making. You organised a vendetta with him and then jumped the gun when you thought he was unprotected with no tags!

I suggest you contact Lord Al and arrange a restart of your vendetta with him, and this time play by the rules.

Lord Al, stop with the attitude in your posts, it does you no favours. Do your talking on the battlefield and not with a war of words on the forums.

I suggest everyone else stay out of this and let them sort it between themselves. Whilst they both do not have to like each other, hopefully they can both at least show a bit of respect to each other.

D1

Re: lord al vs Knight Arthur

Posted: Mon Nov 02, 2009 9:53 am
by Captain Teague
~Destruction1~ wrote:
King Eomer wrote:
Jedi~Tank wrote:wait. so there was help by others to mass a dde officer?


jedi tank you might find i massed him when he was kicked out of DoC so it isnt a war declaration


KA, just because he doesn't currently wear empire tags does not mean he stops being an officer of a DDE member. That is the point JT is making. You organised a vendetta with him and then jumped the gun when you thought he was unprotected with no tags!

I suggest you contact Lord Al and arrange a restart of your vendetta with him, and this time play by the rules.

Lord Al, stop with the attitude in your posts, it does you no favours. Do your talking on the battlefield and not with a war of words on the forums.

I suggest everyone else stay out of this and let them sort it between themselves. Whilst they both do not have to like each other, hopefully they can both at least show a bit of respect to each other.

D1




yes i agree you should leave it to us with no rules thats what lord al wants just let us take each other down i dont believe in rules for 2 months personal vendetta thats for alliance wars lol.

Re: lord al vs Knight Arthur

Posted: Mon Nov 02, 2009 9:54 am
by LORD AL
~Destruction1~ wrote:
King Eomer wrote:
Jedi~Tank wrote:wait. so there was help by others to mass a dde officer?


jedi tank you might find i massed him when he was kicked out of DoC so it isnt a war declaration


KA, just because he doesn't currently wear empire tags does not mean he stops being an officer of a DDE member. That is the point JT is making. You organised a vendetta with him and then jumped the gun when you thought he was unprotected with no tags!

I suggest you contact Lord Al and arrange a restart of your vendetta with him, and this time play by the rules.

Lord Al, stop with the attitude in your posts, it does you no favours. Do your talking on the battlefield and not with a war of words on the forums.

I suggest everyone else stay out of this and let them sort it between themselves. Whilst they both do not have to like each other, hopefully they can both at least show a bit of respect to each other.

D1

ill keep that in mind

Re: lord al vs Knight Arthur

Posted: Mon Nov 02, 2009 10:13 am
by Angel Slayer
King Eomer wrote:
~Destruction1~ wrote:
King Eomer wrote:
Jedi~Tank wrote:wait. so there was help by others to mass a dde officer?


jedi tank you might find i massed him when he was kicked out of DoC so it isnt a war declaration


KA, just because he doesn't currently wear empire tags does not mean he stops being an officer of a DDE member. That is the point JT is making. You organised a vendetta with him and then jumped the gun when you thought he was unprotected with no tags!

I suggest you contact Lord Al and arrange a restart of your vendetta with him, and this time play by the rules.

Lord Al, stop with the attitude in your posts, it does you no favours. Do your talking on the battlefield and not with a war of words on the forums.

I suggest everyone else stay out of this and let them sort it between themselves. Whilst they both do not have to like each other, hopefully they can both at least show a bit of respect to each other.

D1




yes i agree you should leave it to us with no rules thats what lord al wants just let us take each other down i dont believe in rules for 2 months personal vendetta thats for alliance wars lol.




How can you call it a personal vendetta when you have two others joining you in massing Lord Al ?
To me thats kind of cowardish.