Page 8 of 9
Re: $$ Arguement
Posted: Thu Feb 11, 2010 1:36 pm
by Neimenljivi
Borek wrote:Neimenljivi wrote:Nicely put Dresnov, but the thing is that Borek thinks everything revolves about SGW apparently. Apparently you need to go to an employee on a job interview and say "Can I get a job? I REALLY need it to earn some cash so I can build my MS up on online game called stargatewars!"
Max while that is true that you can get your MS there without using $$ it just takes time and devotion. But I bet some of duderanch's cookies went into that MS too, and it's not like he hands them over every day
Note: I'm not saying it's wrong that u put that naq here and that it can't be counted - u got it fair and square, but 200tril does take some time for you to farm normally
~N
Quite the opposite, you are just saying that those with the most time on their hands to play the game should automatically "win". b/s, if someone wants to spend a small amount of their weekly wages paying for resources so they can spend their game time actually having fun instead of wasting their time "having" to farm just to mass, why wouldn't they?
To be honest it's stupid to "play" the game for 40+ hrs a week when you can go get a job and spend 3-4 hrs worth of wages (less if you have a well paid job) just buying the resources.
Like i keep saying, time is money.
Do you honestly think Qacol (for example) has more or less fun when he logs in to his monster account and trashes his enemies? He earns his money, he can spend it on whatever he wants, he chooses to spend some of it on SGW, supporting the game for all of us as well as individual sellers who need the money for whatever reason.
Simple truth is you're all just jealous he can kick your ass, recover instantly from any attempts to retaliate on him etc. Suck it up peeps, his account is better than yours, he's having fun playing, whining about it i dare say just makes him laugh.
If the time and massing is so important why don't they buy the game off Jason, give themselves unlimited resources and give every player 50tril def. It's almost the same as what they're doing now.
Oh and btw, is it fun for you to get everything on the easiest way? Sometimes working hard for what you get is the bigger portion of fun.
~N
Re: $$ Arguement
Posted: Thu Feb 11, 2010 1:40 pm
by Borek
Jason isn't selling the game, so can't buy something that isn't for sale, can only buy the ocean of tears streaming down your cheeks
Re: $$ Arguement
Posted: Thu Feb 11, 2010 1:40 pm
by deni
Neimenljivi wrote:Oh and btw, is it fun for you to get everything on the easiest way? Sometimes working hard for what you get is the bigger portion of fun.
~N
Shame you did miss that fun though as you bought your account with $ rather than build an account on your own.
So please, do not give advice you cannot follow yourself. It is hypocritical.
Re: $$ Arguement
Posted: Thu Feb 11, 2010 1:45 pm
by Neimenljivi
deni wrote:Neimenljivi wrote:Oh and btw, is it fun for you to get everything on the easiest way? Sometimes working hard for what you get is the bigger portion of fun.
~N
Shame you did miss that fun though as you bought your account with $ rather than build an account on your own.
So please, do not give advice you cannot follow yourself. It is hypocritical.
You do realize that the $ which were used for this account were from selling my account and from selling naq here, right? So how is it hypocritical of me? This is called economical strategy.
As I said - I only dislike those that brag about how good they are and how they can mass anyone and everything they have on their account and skills = $ from RL. I never used ANY dime of my own on this game.
Actually Borek I wouldn't be surprised if he does want to sell it, seeing as he hardly cares about it anymore anyway.
~N
Re: $$ Arguement
Posted: Thu Feb 11, 2010 1:49 pm
by deni
Neimenljivi wrote:deni wrote:Neimenljivi wrote:Oh and btw, is it fun for you to get everything on the easiest way? Sometimes working hard for what you get is the bigger portion of fun.
~N
Shame you did miss that fun though as you bought your account with $ rather than build an account on your own.
So please, do not give advice you cannot follow yourself. It is hypocritical.
You do realize that the $ which were used for this account were from selling my account and from selling naq here, right? So how is it hypocritical of me? This is called economical strategy.
As I said - I only dislike those that brag about how good they are and how they can mass anyone and everything they have on their account and skills = $ from RL. I never used ANY dime of my own on this game.
Actually Borek I wouldn't be surprised if he does want to sell it, seeing as he hardly cares about it anymore anyway.
~N
But when I sell naq and buy say USS or AT from the $ made, I am a $ spender. Right, I get your logic
Re: $$ Arguement
Posted: Thu Feb 11, 2010 1:52 pm
by Neimenljivi
deni wrote:[spoiler]
Neimenljivi wrote:deni wrote:Neimenljivi wrote:Oh and btw, is it fun for you to get everything on the easiest way? Sometimes working hard for what you get is the bigger portion of fun.
~N
Shame you did miss that fun though as you bought your account with $ rather than build an account on your own.
So please, do not give advice you cannot follow yourself. It is hypocritical.
You do realize that the $ which were used for this account were from selling my account and from selling naq here, right? So how is it hypocritical of me? This is called economical strategy.
As I said - I only dislike those that brag about how good they are and how they can mass anyone and everything they have on their account and skills = $ from RL. I never used ANY dime of my own on this game.
Actually Borek I wouldn't be surprised if he does want to sell it, seeing as he hardly cares about it anymore anyway.
~N
[/spoiler]
But when I sell naq and buy say USS or AT from the $ made, I am a $ spender. Right, I get your logic
Yes that's exactly what I say all the time
My problem is not with you, "I" have also "donated" about 200$ to the game (on Quantum though, just one USS on main I believe) back when I thought it was worth it and back when I thought admin deserved it..
~N
Re: $$ Arguement
Posted: Thu Feb 11, 2010 3:14 pm
by jedi~tank
I see the traitor noob still whining about $$.
Re: $$ Arguement
Posted: Thu Feb 11, 2010 3:25 pm
by qacol
You all are so funny, I'm glad the TTF players I was teammates with for over 20 months have not trashed me. I thank you.
For all the others that don't know me, I'm a teamplayer and have good friends in this game that like my game play. I do have a nice account and Yes I can play very well.. For all that have had fights with me, they can tell you that I can fight.
I don't talk down to you and you keep on trash talking about my spending cash. Well too bad.. Get over it.. Who are you to say how the game is to be played... show me in the rules of the game it say's I have to play by your rules... Last time I looked the Black Market keeps lowering it's prices to match the sellers in the game... WHY Jason needs money to keep it running, he needs to sell resources to keep the game going.
So keep up the work selling naq and uu and I'll by uu,AT's and naq from the blackmarket to keep the game going.
SIDE NOTE: I'm a Gulf War Vet and I know I served my Country.
~Qacol~
WAR VET
Re: $$ Arguement
Posted: Thu Feb 11, 2010 3:31 pm
by JediMasterX
JT: I'm a traitor, but so is qacol, what's the difference?
Qacol: congrats on being a gulf war vet. I really respect that and thanks for serving the country. Hopefully I'll be off to bootcamp around August or earlier for the Navy.
Re: $$ Arguement
Posted: Thu Feb 11, 2010 3:33 pm
by jedi~tank
JediMasterX wrote:JT: I'm a traitor, but so is qacol, what's the difference?
Qacol: congrats on being a gulf war vet. I really respect that and thanks for serving the country. Hopefully I'll be off to bootcamp around August or earlier for the Navy.
The difference is Qacol gives his all plus allot more. I know his efforts as enemy and his efforts as ally. What have you given? A bunch of crap to read and reply too is about it.
Re: $$ Arguement
Posted: Thu Feb 11, 2010 3:45 pm
by JediMasterX
Yeah, JT. I'm just posting, I'm not massing MS's or stealing naq. You're so right.....not.
Re: $$ Arguement
Posted: Thu Feb 11, 2010 3:47 pm
by qacol
I have this bug called PPT, darn thing will not let me attack.
~Qacol~
PPT BUG
Re: $$ Arguement
Posted: Thu Feb 11, 2010 5:06 pm
by TacticalCommander
This thread is a good laugh. Anyway, I explain something very important to everyone.
Each person has their own account and each person is free to do with it as they please. If that means spending $$ to improve, they are free to do it. $$ arguments have been around ever since SS came out.
And for the most part, the complaints are same, they are building their account to high level, etc. About only real difference between the old arguments and these arguments is nobody is accusing of Omega of using $$ to get the admin to do what they want him to do.
Yeah, I've been against $$ spending, or rather non SS cash spending, because the Admin does need to eat after all. Its not worth getting all upset about it. I've learned, you don't need a top line account to have fun at this game.
But if you want to improve faster, I recommend farming instead of arguing against something that is not going to change.
TC
Re: $$ Arguement
Posted: Thu Feb 11, 2010 7:41 pm
by KnowLedge
qacol wrote:
SIDE NOTE: I'm a Gulf War Vet and I know I served my Country.
~Qacol~
WAR VET
hehe
when i saw that, i was thinking.. "wasnt gulf war in the 1960s, 70s? so that must mean this player is like 50 +..
but then i googled "gulf war" rite away to make sure
Re: $$ Arguement
Posted: Thu Feb 11, 2010 7:48 pm
by papa~smurf
I am 50+ lol
(and have spent real money on the game, not much, but some)