StarGateWars Forums

Lord Yojimbo wrote:Why should anyone fear anyone - FUALL, EPA, FS and others have war rep but still all that gains is some respect - not a pass for the Fear Factory

THats it! I'm warring you! XD why not sounds fun want to?

RoKeT wrote:

Lord Yojimbo wrote:Why should anyone fear anyone - FUALL, EPA, FS and others have war rep but still all that gains is some respect - not a pass for the Fear Factory

THats it! I'm warring you! XD why not sounds fun want to?

hmm - sounds tempting but im completely out of resources can we reschedule?

I have a friendly fight over due with seph at some stage as well

Oh dratz okay XD we shall rescedual I think I have a few backed up myself anyways rofl

Cool - my msn is snaps-85@hotmail.com - drop me an IM whenever and we can arrange some fun Hope somewhere in the near future

Reminder - looking at the thoughts on the game thus far here excluding the propoganda folks I suggested the following instead of giving out and cackling like hens :

"Mad idea

But my Idea


Maybe a representative council of alliances should be created with the task of reviewing the game and coming up with detailed proposals to improve the game - normal feedback wont do the job especailly looking at the large swathes of disgruntlement over the latest updates so why not have a council of all leaders and reps of as many alliances to thrash out a reasonable proposal for improvements when it comes to war and then propose it to admin?

I know its democratic and beurocratic and possibly tedious and slow but at least there would be a structure in place for future proposed updates with an assurance of all involved in its inception and to put such developed ideas forth to the admin....


Politics and Propoganda aside - We need a system to determine The Victors and Losers in War (dont think more overly costly massing is the answer - sorry admin )

So why not come up with the answer - All of Us "

Couple interested parties thus far - anyone else? It wont work without all your imput

damn roket i was gunna take him

Lord Yojimbo wrote:Cool - my msn is snaps-85@hotmail.com - drop me an IM whenever and we can arrange some fun Hope somewhere in the near future

Reminder - looking at the thoughts on the game thus far ehre excluding the propoganda folks I suggested the following instead of giving out and cackling like hens:

"Mad idea

But my Idea


Maybe a representative council of alliances should be created with the task of reviewing the game and coming up with detailed proposals to improve the game - normal feedback wont do the job especailly looking at the large swathes of disgruntlement over the latest updates so why not have a council of all leaders and reps of as many alliances to thrash out a reasonable proposal for improvements when it comes to war and then propose it to admin?

I know its democratic and beurocratic and possibly tedious and slow but at least there would be a structure in place for future proposed updates with an assurance of all involved in its inception and to put such developed ideas forth to the admin....


Politics and Propoganda aside - We need a system to determine The Victors and Losers in War (dont think more overly costly massing is the answer - sorry admin )

So why not come up with the answer - All of Us "

Couple interested parties thus far - anyone else? It wont work without all your imput

Skunky :
Oh yes great idea, that will solve the problem to everything.

Doc wrote:

Lord Yojimbo wrote:Cool - my msn is snaps-85@hotmail.com - drop me an IM whenever and we can arrange some fun Hope somewhere in the near future

Reminder - looking at the thoughts on the game thus far ehre excluding the propoganda folks I suggested the following instead of giving out and cackling like hens:

"Mad idea

But my Idea


Maybe a representative council of alliances should be created with the task of reviewing the game and coming up with detailed proposals to improve the game - normal feedback wont do the job especailly looking at the large swathes of disgruntlement over the latest updates so why not have a council of all leaders and reps of as many alliances to thrash out a reasonable proposal for improvements when it comes to war and then propose it to admin?

I know its democratic and beurocratic and possibly tedious and slow but at least there would be a structure in place for future proposed updates with an assurance of all involved in its inception and to put such developed ideas forth to the admin....


Politics and Propoganda aside - We need a system to determine The Victors and Losers in War (dont think more overly costly massing is the answer - sorry admin )

So why not come up with the answer - All of Us "

Couple interested parties thus far - anyone else? It wont work without all your imput

Skunky :
Oh yes great idea, that will solve the problem to everything.

Better than bloody moaning and whinging mixed with the resultant propogada war without any possible end result

YOU THINK OF SOMETHING BETTER??

Lord Yojimbo wrote:

Doc wrote:

Lord Yojimbo wrote:Cool - my msn is snaps-85@hotmail.com - drop me an IM whenever and we can arrange some fun Hope somewhere in the near future

Reminder - looking at the thoughts on the game thus far ehre excluding the propoganda folks I suggested the following instead of giving out and cackling like hens:

"Mad idea

But my Idea


Maybe a representative council of alliances should be created with the task of reviewing the game and coming up with detailed proposals to improve the game - normal feedback wont do the job especailly looking at the large swathes of disgruntlement over the latest updates so why not have a council of all leaders and reps of as many alliances to thrash out a reasonable proposal for improvements when it comes to war and then propose it to admin?

I know its democratic and beurocratic and possibly tedious and slow but at least there would be a structure in place for future proposed updates with an assurance of all involved in its inception and to put such developed ideas forth to the admin....


Politics and Propoganda aside - We need a system to determine The Victors and Losers in War (dont think more overly costly massing is the answer - sorry admin )

So why not come up with the answer - All of Us "

Couple interested parties thus far - anyone else? It wont work without all your imput

Skunky :
Oh yes great idea, that will solve the problem to everything.

Better than bloody moaning and whinging mixed with the resultant propogada war without any possible end result

YOU THINK OF SOMETHING BETTER??

Skunky:
Doesn't really affect me so idc
but people arent all going to work together to solve it, jsut wont happen.. nothing wrong with the thing atm if peple have an idea then propose it...
lulz

well I hope people will look at it and see that there is a way to do something about it for a change and the more allainces we have behind it the more validity any proposed reforms would hold

donais wrote:So after reading through this thread I have come to a couple conclusions.

1. this thread is why I dont post on main alls it is is a bunch of propaganda. (from all sides)

2. Fuall is ontop like it or not (but theres a reason they keep propaganda going)

3. No one has been smart enough or come up with a way to unify all the "others"

4. I guess thats why the propaganda continues because someone isnt secure where they sit

so peace out girl scouts

Think you missed the point mate, yes FUALL is the biggest most powerful empire, but unifying the enemies of FUALL has nothing to do with being smart or seeing through the propaganda, the various enemies of various parts of FUALL know the truth already, they simply dont want to be unified, they dont want to be a small cog in a big machine, they are quite happy playing in their own little groups of friends.

Occasionally, say every year or so when enough independent alliances and minor empires at at war with the various CoP/FUALL alliances at the same time they might collaborate in common interest like CIA and TTF did, but these are always intended to be short term arrangements, and the 2 occasions it has happened so far both ended in standoffs with agreed draws and NAPs. Then they go back to the way they like to play until CoP/FUALL get to big for their boots forcing their various enemies into collaboration again.

TBH anyone who thinks that FUALL have won the game should just leave, because if the game has been won, then it's over and time to start a new game

Then leave because this retoric you keep hanging onto is quite frankly uninteresting to the community at large. You have absolutely no idea what FUALL, DDE or OE is about but its obvious what you and your m8's are about. If you dont want to be flattened then dont form a coalition to topple it..and this "too big for thier boots" line is stupid..it would only take 5 of us to do what 200 did last time and me really dont give a rats ass who dont like it or who disagrees with it truth is absolute. If you enjoy your state then have at it, we enjoy ours and are HAVING AT IT

well jt has proven my point for me...anyone says anything to try to stir the pot the opposite direction he wants, u get sabbed and massed and get nice little pms saying im gonna eat your babies

Jedi~Tank wrote: Every post you make Hal is a shot

sorry for long response..... mowing lawn (weird pattern only mowed under the trees lol )

not taking a shot at u, only taking what u say on face value, comparing it to what u say. it is an "us and them" game always has been u play it that way per your posting and account. if u see that as a cheap shot, sorry not meant that way, Now the "go to your room" comment really Charles, u say that in the same sentence as saying i am taking shots at u wow lol i am so hurt.

seems that "sniper" is the new "vulture" (who else remembers when that theme was all the rage)

if some one wants to play with no defense, who made any one the rule demi god of GW to say they have to?

just cause u (u being who ever u are ) thinks that there is "honor" in building a defense, lol get real it the internet people do as they want

build , don't build, but don't complain that some one doesn't maybe it means they just don't want to play with u .

haha LOL. POINT!

papa~smurf wrote:seems that "sniper" is the new "vulture" (who else remembers when that theme was all the rage)

if some one wants to play with no defense, who made any one the rule demi god of GW to say they have to?

just cause u (u being who ever u are ) thinks that there is "honor" in building a defense, lol get real it the internet people do as they want

build , don't build, but don't complain that some one doesn't maybe it means they just don't want to play with u .

Skunky:
Good shout there.
Literally **Filtered** who think that they can decide how people should play the game should just get over themselves being so uptight.
I like how i got told the other day i'm ruining the game with my "vulturing" and "sniping"