StarGateWars Forums

.tackless shadow. wrote:WOW DDE are really full of them selfs...... i see ye still have the we do what we want and we tell the server what to do attitude

im off for the day so talk all the crap ye want ill correct it when i come back midweek

Jedi~Tank wrote:I will be challenging all current enemies of DDE to battles no matter the alliance they reside in for "protection" or have unfinished business.

~~tackless shadow~~
ID 84300

for traitor acts against the DDE while a member, details well known by you, you are hereby marked for destruction.

caesar2 wrote:

Jedi~Tank wrote:I will be challenging all current enemies of DDE to battles no matter the alliance they reside in for "protection" or have unfinished business.

~~tackless shadow~~
ID 84300

for traitor acts against the DDE while a member, details well known by you, you are hereby marked for destruction.

Well is this JT vs tackles or its DDE vs tackles? Just to be sure how should I react on our attack log.

caesar2 wrote:JT started vendeta and this topic.
DDE members joined our logs now.
Am asking him!

Maybe name of topic can be changed, or moved to another section if needed.

Nostra wrote:

caesar2 wrote:JT started vendeta and this topic.
DDE members joined our logs now.
Am asking him!

Maybe name of topic can be changed, or moved to another section if needed.

I think it probably does need to be changed, but seeing as this is JT's thread, he will have a final say in that ofc.

Problem here simply lies with tackless.
He joined your alliance carrying a lot of baggage. (of which I hope you were aware)
He has been called out on this vendetta, and continued to farm other branches .... with his traitor mark ... its not wise for him to attack all the DDE alliances, it will have repercusssions.

if HE would live up to the vendetta ... he would not farm all other DDE branches now would he

Nostra

black rose wrote:hey tackless just a little advise but maybe you should step back and look at this situation and then come back and post, you seem to have a bit of a temper when posting, just remeber its a game...

please dont take offense to this as i dont know the history between yourself and TDD

have fun jedi and tack

Jedi~Tank wrote:

Lithium wrote:i dont think DDE didnt knew who was tacky ingame b4 he changed name, anyway he betrayed dde during war but is that the first case ever?? there has been a lot of players.now dde wana bully his game till he quits , the result one player minus and this isnt what we were speaking on the Galactic Council , theres honor in this???tacky has no any special account as far as i know and just one medium dde player can challenge him to vendetta , but guess it takes the usual's.i see here lot of double standards but this isnt new to me , been used wit them for over 4 years.

Well for the record..Committed to Excellence.. Entrance by Invitation Only! Double Standards is the name of our game !And there is no intention on my behalf to drive tacky poo from the game, yes we knew Lalwless one was Tack because Law told me when he sold his account to him. And vendetta's for whatever reason are apart of the game so don't get in an uproar over it..this is all in the spirit of the game..I do fail to see how a forum user group name would drive a person mad as it did this clown..meh who cares onward!!!!

.tackless shadow. wrote:

Jedi~Tank wrote:

Lithium wrote:i dont think DDE didnt knew who was tacky ingame b4 he changed name, anyway he betrayed dde during war but is that the first case ever?? there has been a lot of players.now dde wana bully his game till he quits , the result one player minus and this isnt what we were speaking on the Galactic Council , theres honor in this???tacky has no any special account as far as i know and just one medium dde player can challenge him to vendetta , but guess it takes the usual's.i see here lot of double standards but this isnt new to me , been used wit them for over 4 years.

Well for the record..Committed to Excellence.. Entrance by Invitation Only! Double Standards is the name of our game !And there is no intention on my behalf to drive tacky poo from the game, yes we knew Lalwless one was Tack because Law told me when he sold his account to him. And vendetta's for whatever reason are apart of the game so don't get in an uproar over it..this is all in the spirit of the game..I do fail to see how a forum user group name would drive a person mad as it did this clown..meh who cares onward!!!!

strange.... i dont recall my GF phantom452 telling you that she sold me the account...... she left i took it over and sold my old acc because this acc was a higher ascended lvl. i then changed the name of the acc to lawless one. so your sayig lawless one(me) told you that i bought the acc from me

Rocky wrote:be nice lithium, he was only giving friendly advice.

renegadze wrote:I love the fact a few comments in this thread are arguing points of law about the manipulation of data being from what I can garnish.....theft?

While to a degree you may have a point.

In reality this would possibly get laughed out of court.

The argument is always going to be about trust and delegation. Fact is, for whatever reason YOU/Another Admin gave Tackless shadow the security rights to be able to perform said actions. He did not (from what I can tell) hack the site to be able to carry out this?

So the basic questions you'd be asked will be....

1) Why did he have said right?
2) Was there sufficient warnings\disclaimers about potential lawsuits should the data be manipulated?
3) Was the data copyrighted?
4) Were there appropriate guidelines around what data was allowed to be changed?

This would be like creating a file on your laptop, lending the laptop to a friend, and them deleting the file. You'd have a hard time getting a civil action against them.

Were tackless's actions morally right? probably not

To sum it up, He was given rights to change data, you didn't like what he changed the data to?