Page 8 of 10

Re: Server War III - The Participants

Posted: Mon Jun 13, 2011 9:04 pm
by Empy
Well if HVE doesn't start the next Server War then I will be wildly surprised ...

Re: Server War III - The Participants

Posted: Mon Jun 13, 2011 9:11 pm
by whereub
Jedi~Tank wrote:
Field Marshall wrote:Whilst on crazy rumours...was there any strength behind the ricos/mH/DDE one?

Just out of curiosity :)

I was hoping for a big war when the houses update came to fruition...I think the big guns are scared of their shadows now...they've grown weak in this time for tranquility. Though such a war would be fun...it would be for a month or two..maybe we should organise that?

That'll clear some of these silly defences out there..mind, I wouldn't want the challenge of a 250t defence...no sir, not me :D


Yes, actually the 3 alliance leaderships were on teamspeak one evening..and JJ(whereub)farted and that pissed off Foresee, then ARk got pissed because Forsee was pissed at JJ, so then I got pissed because JJ farted and Ark and Forsee was pissed because I was pissed at them, so Yes the 3 alliances almost went to war against each other that day because JJ farted.



This big gun aint afraid of nuthin



too bad you couldnt smell it :smt022

i dont condone violence :smt056

Re: Server War III - The Participants

Posted: Mon Jun 13, 2011 9:35 pm
by Clarkey
E.M.P. wrote:Well if HVE doesn't start the next Server War then I will be wildly surprised ...
I knew SS couldn't be trusted. Slimey green one. He has his secret weapon, the E.M.P. device. :-#

Re: Server War III - The Participants

Posted: Mon Jun 13, 2011 9:44 pm
by jedi~tank
Rabbid Thom wrote:yeah we had somthing that was meant to help keep people in the game what was it.... :smt017

oh the galactic council what ever happened there? i guess ME is far more important to you'll now

What happened there is some folks decided to let their petty pride and pet peeves get in the way of working together so its sitting there..some of us however have not given up the idea and are pressing on regardless. ;)

Re: Server War III - The Participants

Posted: Mon Jun 13, 2011 11:09 pm
by Ryuujin Jakka
Tekki wrote:We did have the suggestion on the OE forum to have a server war once a year for 2-3 months of the year. But we could not figure out how to make it work.

Field Marshall wrote:That'll clear some of these silly defences out there..mind, I wouldn't want the challenge of a 250t defence...no sir, not me :D
Wasn't' the rest of your alliance saying it could be done?



Quotes What KJ said


althought i wouldnt of said it so politley

Re: Server War III - The Participants

Posted: Mon Jun 13, 2011 11:32 pm
by Field Marshall
Tekki wrote:
Kjarkur wrote:
Tekki wrote:Wasn't' the rest of your alliance saying it could be done?


I fail to see how claiming something can be done and wanting to do it being the same thing.

I know I can go bunchy jumping tomorrow - but that doesn't mean I want to.

That being said, do all of OE agree on all subjects ?

Perhaps not in this conversation but certainly the ‘certainty’ that it could be done was used to justify a few things, KJ.


People once said that a 3T planet defence was unmassable...every defence can fall, it is a matter of planning and sheer numbers.

That said, do not think that we underestimate both the logistics and difficulty...does OE not strategise and run scenarios, because what if you were to go to war against mH tomorrow?

"Would you say, it's unmassable, shall we hang up our coats and go to the pub?" :-D

...I would hope not :smt017

Jedi~Tank wrote:
Field Marshall wrote:Whilst on crazy rumours...was there any strength behind the ricos/mH/DDE one?

Just out of curiosity :)

I was hoping for a big war when the houses update came to fruition...I think the big guns are scared of their shadows now...they've grown weak in this time for tranquility. Though such a war would be fun...it would be for a month or two..maybe we should organise that?

That'll clear some of these silly defences out there..mind, I wouldn't want the challenge of a 250t defence...no sir, not me :D


Yes, actually the 3 alliance leaderships were on teamspeak one evening..and JJ(whereub)farted and that pissed off Foresee, then ARk got pissed because Forsee was pissed at JJ, so then I got pissed because JJ farted and Ark and Forsee was pissed because I was pissed at them, so Yes the 3 alliances almost went to war against each other that day because JJ farted.


I knew it!...sometimes rumours do become true =D>

...does this mean that I really am in a DDE run alliance?! #-o

Jedi~Tank wrote:This big gun aint afraid of nuthin


:smt100

Re: Server War III - The Participants

Posted: Mon Jun 13, 2011 11:43 pm
by semper
Mordack wrote:Maybe it's less about saving the game and more about going out with a bang.. ;)


I firmly agree with you here Mordack.


Everyone vs everyone... go out with a large bang then all of you go outside and remind yourselves what fresh air is!

Re: Server War III - The Participants

Posted: Mon Jun 13, 2011 11:44 pm
by Field Marshall
Semper wrote:
Mordack wrote:Maybe it's less about saving the game and more about going out with a bang.. ;)


I firmly agree with you here Mordack.


Everyone vs everyone... go out with a large bang then all of you go outside and remind yourselves what fresh air is!


Field Marshal "likes" this :smt023

Re: Server War III - The Participants

Posted: Mon Jun 13, 2011 11:49 pm
by Ryuujin Jakka
Field Marshall wrote:
Semper wrote:
Mordack wrote:Maybe it's less about saving the game and more about going out with a bang.. ;)


I firmly agree with you here Mordack.


Everyone vs everyone... go out with a large bang then all of you go outside and remind yourselves what fresh air is!


Field Marshal "likes" this :smt023


so does ryunator ;)

Re: Server War III - The Participants

Posted: Tue Jun 14, 2011 2:12 am
by Juliette
Tekki wrote:So because people were leaving, a server war will fix it…. How naïve of you.
Who said anything about fixing? :roll: I am in awe of your reading skills.
Tekki wrote:I would look at the reasons people were leaving – age, money spending, etc rather than trying to come up with a one hit fix… which still does not address the way that a server war dictates one way of play. Sniping.
Well.. we can handle snipers. Are you saying you can not?
Tekki wrote:We are in awe of JT's posting skills.
We are, indeed.

Re: Server War III - The Participants

Posted: Tue Jun 14, 2011 7:00 am
by whereub
Juliette wrote:
Tekki wrote:So because people were leaving, a server war will fix it…. How naïve of you.
Who said anything about fixing? :roll: I am in awe of your reading skills.


:smt043 :smt046 she reads what she wants to see

Re: Server War III - The Participants

Posted: Tue Jun 14, 2011 8:33 am
by Brdavs
Generations vs. the world 8-[

Re: Server War III - The Participants

Posted: Tue Jun 14, 2011 8:36 am
by kaboom
Anyone else.. please list.

Kaboomer

Re: Server War III - The Participants

Posted: Tue Jun 14, 2011 9:24 am
by Lord Yojimbo
Jedi~Tank wrote:
Field Marshall wrote:Whilst on crazy rumours...was there any strength behind the ricos/mH/DDE one?

Just out of curiosity :)

I was hoping for a big war when the houses update came to fruition...I think the big guns are scared of their shadows now...they've grown weak in this time for tranquility. Though such a war would be fun...it would be for a month or two..maybe we should organise that?

That'll clear some of these silly defences out there..mind, I wouldn't want the challenge of a 250t defence...no sir, not me :D


Yes, actually the 3 alliance leaderships were on teamspeak one evening..and JJ(whereub)farted and that pissed off Foresee, then ARk got pissed because Forsee was pissed at JJ, so then I got pissed because JJ farted and Ark and Forsee was pissed because I was pissed at them, so Yes the 3 alliances almost went to war against each other that day because JJ farted.



This big gun aint afraid of nuthin


Have to laugh at that - :smt043 :smt081

Re: Server War III - The Participants

Posted: Tue Jun 14, 2011 11:21 am
by Juliette
Brdavs wrote:Generations vs. the world 8-[
While the attention is flattering, I doubt it would do you any good.