StarGateWars Forums

ƒëmmë ƒatalë wrote:now we have mod/GM posting references to opium and smoking in the spam temple hardly pg13 is it?

Oh for the love of God. Learn what PG-13 really means FFS.

Besides, Juliette is right. Your behavior is far worse than anything discussed in this thread. Though I have no idea what incident she refers to.

Clarkey wrote:

Juliette wrote:@Clarkey: Next time you have the **Filtered** balls to call me a paedophile, I will have you made to regret it. Deeply.

Me regret it? You can't do anything to me sitting behind your computer screen.

Oh, too true. Character murder is such a simple thing to do. That is something that can be done from behind a computer screen.. and then there are .. other things.

Clarkey wrote:For the record as i've said to you already I did not call you or insinutate you were a paedophile. That's the problem with the internet, things can get read out of context. So get of your high horse, admit that you dug your own hole and deal with it.
I never called you a paedophile. End of.

So you said. I am not going to be in this argument with you. If you or those dimwits want to continue your attack on my character, you are welcome to. If I ever see any of this come back to me in any way other than on this forum, there are a few things computer screens can be used for.

You speak about context, while that was the first thing you lot threw out the window when starting this witch hunt. Appealing to it now is just pathetic. Should have thought of that before you went out to go and call me a paedophile.


(For the record; "you cannot compare smoking to paedophilia", in a thread about my post, is calling me a paedophile. Simple as that. You can wriggle and twist, but that is how it is. Think about that, before you tell me to 'grow up' again. If I weren't, I wouldn't give a damn about such words.)

Character murder? OMG are you threatening to use this as evidence? Wow you have taken this thread to heart.

It was not a witch hunt. femme felt the joke inappropriate so she started a thread about it. Yes there may have been better methods to handle it, but this is the route she chose. Would she have posted about it if someone else had posted the same joke, yes most likely. It is not a witch hunt, you just convinced yourself it is that is all.

As I've said before, this thread is not just about you. It may have been started because of a post you made, but the thread has evolved since then. So me making a comment about comparing smoking and paedophilia does not mean it is direct at you and it was not. You took it all out of context and blew it up out of proportion. I have explained several times what my reference meant, if you chose to refuse to believe it then that is your personal problem.

Fact is I never accused you of being paedophile. End of.

And you are the only person in this thread? My god, aren't you aware of your surroundings? Do you see what is said in this thread? Do you even know what you said?

*chuckles* 'evidence'. No. Not evidence. That would be difficult. More hassle than I would consider it to be worth, as long as it remains confined to this forum.

Seriously, to those whoever called Juliette a paedophile for that joke, you, yes you, are the sick bunch.

I'm really REALLY disappointed (that's such a light word and not proper to what I think) by how this thread turned into. Making the entire Himalaya out of a molehill, it is.

Legendary Apophis wrote:Seriously, to those whoever called Juliette a paedophile for that joke, you, yes you, are the sick bunch.

I'm really REALLY disappointed (that's such a light word and not proper to what I think) by how this thread turned into. Making the entire Himalaya out of a molehill, it is.

No one called anyone a paedophile. Mentioning a post containing paedophilia and accusing someone of paedophilia are completely separate things. Clarkey mentioned comparing smoking with paedophilia (which Julliettes post contained (just the content she included - "that was your evil uncle jack" when talking to a 14 year old about losing virginity) but not calling Julliette a pedophile at all.

looks like a another pointless thread by femme to seek attention..

Haz wrote:

Legendary Apophis wrote:Seriously, to those whoever called Juliette a paedophile for that joke, you, yes you, are the sick bunch.

I'm really REALLY disappointed (that's such a light word and not proper to what I think) by how this thread turned into. Making the entire Himalaya out of a molehill, it is.

No one called anyone a paedophile. Mentioning a post containing paedophilia and accusing someone of paedophilia are completely separate things. Clarkey mentioned comparing smoking with paedophilia (which Julliettes post contained (just the content she included - "that was your evil uncle jack" when talking to a 14 year old about losing virginity) but not calling Julliette a pedophile at all.

Just to clear this up my reference to paedophilia was in response to an image of Pedo Bear, that is all.

I think this issue should end now right here. it is doing no good at all.