Page 8 of 16
Re: OA vs the non NAPPED/DRA
Posted: Wed Dec 25, 2013 12:41 pm
by Loki™
~Coyle~ wrote:Phalax 2013 wrote:~Desert Phantom~ wrote:Gandy 181 wrote:Lol its all still uu lool
You should only mass what you have set up to lose...just my opinion
Doesn't seem fair or fun to mass a huge defense and give nothibg to mass back!
I agree.
But HE and a few others have been massed and we haven't retaliated the only ones that we have retaliated on are the ones that decided to bring other Allegiances into it.
As fir rebuilding there are few accounts that would prefer to some caller stats...HE is catering for them...but he/we will rebuild.. Otherwise we would be like Guild.
Lol why would you think anyone not connected to them wouldn't be targeted back?
^
I have still refrained from touching titans but these comments make me want to do it more and more.
Re: OA vs the non NAPPED/DRA
Posted: Wed Dec 25, 2013 12:48 pm
by ~Coyle~
Loki™ wrote:~Coyle~ wrote:Phalax 2013 wrote:~Desert Phantom~ wrote:Gandy 181 wrote:Lol its all still uu lool
You should only mass what you have set up to lose...just my opinion
Doesn't seem fair or fun to mass a huge defense and give nothibg to mass back!
I agree.
But HE and a few others have been massed and we haven't retaliated the only ones that we have retaliated on are the ones that decided to bring other Allegiances into it.
As fir rebuilding there are few accounts that would prefer to some caller stats...HE is catering for them...but he/we will rebuild.. Otherwise we would be like Guild.
Lol why would you think anyone not connected to them wouldn't be targeted back?
^
I have still refrained from touching titans but these comments make me want to do it more and more.
Out of UU now after my bit of fun tonight.
But na Titans are fair game once I restock. Happy sailing ladies.
Re: OA vs the non NAPPED/DRA
Posted: Wed Dec 25, 2013 12:53 pm
by ~phalax~
~Coyle~ wrote:
Lol why would you think anyone not connected to them wouldn't be targeted back?
I didn't say they wouldn't target others around the Omega and Delta allegiance, it's actually expected these days within Empires, hence it's stated in our recruitment page. All I said is we would retaliate back to those that did
Loki™ wrote:I have still refrained from touching titans but these comments make me want to do it more and more.
Didn't refrain from targeting Sigma though, who weren't involved

and you still haven't hit those that were
And no one is stopping you, we will just target everyone around you

like your doing.
Re: OA vs the non NAPPED/DRA
Posted: Wed Dec 25, 2013 12:58 pm
by ~Coyle~
Phalax 2013 wrote:~Coyle~ wrote:
Lol why would you think anyone not connected to them wouldn't be targeted back?
I didn't say they wouldn't target others around the Omega and Delta allegiance, it's actually expected these days within Empires, hence it's stated in our recruitment page. All I said is we would retaliate back to those that did
Loki™ wrote:I have still refrained from touching titans but these comments make me want to do it more and more.
Didn't refrain from targeting Sigma though, who weren't involved

and you still haven't hit those that were
And no one is stopping you, we will just target everyone around you

like your doing.
Ill get a ball park figure of looses in HVE and we'll aim to repay that plus a few mil, I think we will be happy then. Why not fight DDE or TAF? Are they to equal? And don't go saying the Napped crap, what a cop out, easy ME you were after.
Re: OA vs the non NAPPED/DRA
Posted: Wed Dec 25, 2013 12:58 pm
by Loki™
So you complain about people complaining about getting massed and yet your members send messages like this
Message text:
ya and expect us to respond in kind u r a coward going on ppt so we cant hit u ****in coward bring it on **Filtered**
Phalax 2013 wrote:~Coyle~ wrote:
Lol why would you think anyone not connected to them wouldn't be targeted back?
I didn't say they wouldn't target others around the Omega and Delta allegiance, it's actually expected these days within Empires, hence it's stated in our recruitment page. All I said is we would retaliate back to those that did
Loki™ wrote:I have still refrained from touching titans but these comments make me want to do it more and more.
Didn't refrain from targeting Sigma though, who weren't involved

and you still haven't hit those that were
And no one is stopping you, we will just target everyone around you

like your doing.
Sigma is not a training alliance to my knowledge. I have massed tokko who was part of your party and I will mass more of those. But either way even if had only hit the noobiest titans you have no grounds to complain.
Re: OA vs the non NAPPED/DRA
Posted: Wed Dec 25, 2013 1:04 pm
by IFLuX
Super Guards Lost 19,491,737
Covert Ops Lost 74,041,969 ( more then 40 mil was use in bloody sunday for sabbing
Attack Super Soldiers Killed(300) 37,878,150
Congratz Coyle
![[058.gif] :smt058](./images/smilies/058.gif)
Re: OA vs the non NAPPED/DRA
Posted: Wed Dec 25, 2013 1:07 pm
by ~phalax~
No ones complaining apart from you?
Omega and Delta wanted some fun, your providing it...sweet everyone's happy.
All I said is if you involve the others then the others would get involved and the ones around you as you have done

..... it a game were you mass and get massed.. hell my account was sat on for 4 years.. I've had 2 months of peace I'm still here and still enjoying it.
Re: OA vs the non NAPPED/DRA
Posted: Wed Dec 25, 2013 1:09 pm
by Guild
Phalax 2013 wrote:No ones complaining apart from you?
...he...he just quoted your guys complaining...

Re: OA vs the non NAPPED/DRA
Posted: Wed Dec 25, 2013 1:10 pm
by ~Coyle~
IFLuX wrote:Super Guards Lost 19,491,737
Covert Ops Lost 74,041,969 ( more then 40 mil was use in bloody sunday for sabbing
Attack Super Soldiers Killed(300) 37,878,150
Congratz Coyle
![[058.gif] :smt058](./images/smilies/058.gif)
Spies Killed(50) 312,380,262
Assassin Lost 133,391,002
That's in the 30 mins I had with little naq.
you were saying?
I know what im doing and loose what I want to loose.
Re: OA vs the non NAPPED/DRA
Posted: Wed Dec 25, 2013 1:57 pm
by Huxley
All pretence has been abandoned, as both teams take to the field naked, covered in lubricant to the sound of pounding techno.
Re: OA vs the non NAPPED/DRA
Posted: Wed Dec 25, 2013 2:46 pm
by ~Coyle~
Huxley wrote:All pretence has been abandoned, as both teams take to the field naked, covered in lubricant to the sound of pounding techno.
![[043.gif] :smt043](./images/smilies/043.gif)
Re: OA vs the non NAPPED/DRA
Posted: Wed Dec 25, 2013 3:19 pm
by zach obourn
Well lost about 60m spies and about 120m ish super guards. Grats on taking advantage during the holidays.
![[018.gif] :smt018](./images/smilies/018.gif)
Re: OA vs the non NAPPED/DRA
Posted: Wed Dec 25, 2013 3:29 pm
by Guild
zach obourn wrote:Well lost about 60m spies and about 120m ish super guards. Grats on taking advantage during the holidays.
![[018.gif] :smt018](./images/smilies/018.gif)
what part of huxleys post didnt you understand noob, it's cos they are the strongest alliance

...gawddd noobs
Re: OA vs the non NAPPED/DRA
Posted: Wed Dec 25, 2013 3:38 pm
by zach obourn
Strongest?
![[043.gif] :smt043](./images/smilies/043.gif)
Re: OA vs the non NAPPED/DRA
Posted: Wed Dec 25, 2013 4:00 pm
by Guild
zach obourn wrote:Strongest?
![[043.gif] :smt043](./images/smilies/043.gif)
![[050.gif] :smt050](./images/smilies/050.gif)